Proof of the Markov Property when Taking “Two steps at a time”.












1














I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.



A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:




  1. $P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$


  2. The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$


  3. Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$


  4. Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$



I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.



Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.



    A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:




    1. $P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$


    2. The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$


    3. Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$


    4. Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$



    I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.



    Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.



      A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:




      1. $P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$


      2. The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$


      3. Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$


      4. Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$



      I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.



      Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !










      share|cite|improve this question













      I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.



      A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:




      1. $P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$


      2. The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$


      3. Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$


      4. Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$



      I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.



      Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !







      stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:25









      PEze

      61




      61






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.



          Let's expand step 4:



          $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$



          $=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$



          $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)



          $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)



          $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006985%2fproof-of-the-markov-property-when-taking-two-steps-at-a-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.



            Let's expand step 4:



            $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$



            $=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$



            $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)



            $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)



            $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.



              Let's expand step 4:



              $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$



              $=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$



              $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)



              $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)



              $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.



                Let's expand step 4:



                $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$



                $=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)






                share|cite|improve this answer












                You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.



                Let's expand step 4:



                $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$



                $=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)



                $=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 3 '18 at 3:00









                Aditya Dua

                83918




                83918






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006985%2fproof-of-the-markov-property-when-taking-two-steps-at-a-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$