Mixing
What is scope of Spring Class annoted using @component annotation in spring mvc?
I was going through spring tutorials and was looking at default scope of beans , so by default scope is singletone only.
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have ? do they create single object only for those class in JVM ? if yes than how web application works will it be thread safe ?
spring spring-mvc
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
add a comment |
I was going through spring tutorials and was looking at default scope of beans , so by default scope is singletone only.
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have ? do they create single object only for those class in JVM ? if yes than how web application works will it be thread safe ?
spring spring-mvc
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00
add a comment |
I was going through spring tutorials and was looking at default scope of beans , so by default scope is singletone only.
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have ? do they create single object only for those class in JVM ? if yes than how web application works will it be thread safe ?
spring spring-mvc
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
I was going through spring tutorials and was looking at default scope of beans , so by default scope is singletone only.
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have ? do they create single object only for those class in JVM ? if yes than how web application works will it be thread safe ?
spring spring-mvc
spring spring-mvc
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
asked Jan 2 at 17:58
arjunarjun
1351113
1351113
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00
add a comment |
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have?
They are singletons unless you use @Scope and specify a different scope.
Do they create a single object only for those class in JVM?
Spring creates one object per container. It's important since your JVM can run several Spring containers at once.
Will a web application be thread safe?
It's up to you. Spring can guarantee that lifecycle operations over a component are performed in a thread-safe manner (e.g. a bean instance is published thread-safely). However, Spring can't predict your application logic and how you define its correctness. For this reason, it doesn't provide any level of synchronisation, which might be insufficient or an overhead.
A good discussion on this part is here.
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
add a comment |
Every bean managed by Spring container has Singleton scope by default no matter either you use annotation or xml, unless you don't override its default one.
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011005%2fwhat-is-scope-of-spring-class-annoted-using-component-annotation-in-spring-mvc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have?
They are singletons unless you use @Scope and specify a different scope.
Do they create a single object only for those class in JVM?
Spring creates one object per container. It's important since your JVM can run several Spring containers at once.
Will a web application be thread safe?
It's up to you. Spring can guarantee that lifecycle operations over a component are performed in a thread-safe manner (e.g. a bean instance is published thread-safely). However, Spring can't predict your application logic and how you define its correctness. For this reason, it doesn't provide any level of synchronisation, which might be insufficient or an overhead.
A good discussion on this part is here.
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
add a comment |
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have?
They are singletons unless you use @Scope and specify a different scope.
Do they create a single object only for those class in JVM?
Spring creates one object per container. It's important since your JVM can run several Spring containers at once.
Will a web application be thread safe?
It's up to you. Spring can guarantee that lifecycle operations over a component are performed in a thread-safe manner (e.g. a bean instance is published thread-safely). However, Spring can't predict your application logic and how you define its correctness. For this reason, it doesn't provide any level of synchronisation, which might be insufficient or an overhead.
A good discussion on this part is here.
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
add a comment |
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have?
They are singletons unless you use @Scope and specify a different scope.
Do they create a single object only for those class in JVM?
Spring creates one object per container. It's important since your JVM can run several Spring containers at once.
Will a web application be thread safe?
It's up to you. Spring can guarantee that lifecycle operations over a component are performed in a thread-safe manner (e.g. a bean instance is published thread-safely). However, Spring can't predict your application logic and how you define its correctness. For this reason, it doesn't provide any level of synchronisation, which might be insufficient or an overhead.
A good discussion on this part is here.
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
But when we use annotation in classes what scope they have?
They are singletons unless you use @Scope and specify a different scope.
Do they create a single object only for those class in JVM?
Spring creates one object per container. It's important since your JVM can run several Spring containers at once.
Will a web application be thread safe?
It's up to you. Spring can guarantee that lifecycle operations over a component are performed in a thread-safe manner (e.g. a bean instance is published thread-safely). However, Spring can't predict your application logic and how you define its correctness. For this reason, it doesn't provide any level of synchronisation, which might be insufficient or an overhead.
A good discussion on this part is here.
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
edited Jan 2 at 18:47
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
answered Jan 2 at 18:07
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
28.4k104589
28.4k104589
add a comment |
add a comment |
Every bean managed by Spring container has Singleton scope by default no matter either you use annotation or xml, unless you don't override its default one.
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
add a comment |
Every bean managed by Spring container has Singleton scope by default no matter either you use annotation or xml, unless you don't override its default one.
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
add a comment |
Every bean managed by Spring container has Singleton scope by default no matter either you use annotation or xml, unless you don't override its default one.
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
Every bean managed by Spring container has Singleton scope by default no matter either you use annotation or xml, unless you don't override its default one.
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
answered Jan 3 at 8:23
hiteshhitesh
12
12
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
add a comment |
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
it's nice, but it partly answers the question
– Andrew Tobilko
Jan 3 at 9:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011005%2fwhat-is-scope-of-spring-class-annoted-using-component-annotation-in-spring-mvc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
They're singletons. They're thread-safe because they typically are stateless, i.e. their only instance variables are references to other beans that are initialized at startup and never modified. Of course, if you don't know what you're doing and store mutable state in these singletons, they won't be thread-safe.
– JB Nizet
Jan 2 at 18:00