Show that $e^{X^2/2} in L^1$ iff $e^{XY} in L^1$ iff $e^{|XY|} in L^1$
$begingroup$
let $X, Y$ be two identically distributed (both are $mathcal{N}(0,1)$) independent random variables
show that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 iff e^{|XY|} in L^1$.
my attempt :
1st equivalence :
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx =frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{(x-y)^2}{2}}dydx \
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-frac{u^2}{2}}dudx \
& = mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]
end{align} $$
I mean yeah this kinda proves that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 $
but something is bothering me,
because $mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}] = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}dx = +infty$
Q1 :
can't we just say that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1$ is a false claim therefore it can imply anything we desire ?
second equivalence : from the fact that $0< e^{XY} leq e^{|XY|}$
we conclude that $ e^{|XY|} in L^1 implies e^{XY} in L^1$
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{|XY|}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx \
&= frac{1}{2pi}[int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx]\
& leq text{Constant}[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] + mathbb{E}[e^{-XY}] ] = text{Constant}_2[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}]]
end{align} $$
I used the fact that $-X$ and $Y$ are independant and that $X = -X, text{in distribution}$
Q2 :
was my attempt at proving 2nd equivalence correct ?
thanks !
edit 1 : pic of the original problem (it's in french)
probability-theory lp-spaces expected-value
$endgroup$
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
let $X, Y$ be two identically distributed (both are $mathcal{N}(0,1)$) independent random variables
show that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 iff e^{|XY|} in L^1$.
my attempt :
1st equivalence :
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx =frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{(x-y)^2}{2}}dydx \
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-frac{u^2}{2}}dudx \
& = mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]
end{align} $$
I mean yeah this kinda proves that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 $
but something is bothering me,
because $mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}] = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}dx = +infty$
Q1 :
can't we just say that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1$ is a false claim therefore it can imply anything we desire ?
second equivalence : from the fact that $0< e^{XY} leq e^{|XY|}$
we conclude that $ e^{|XY|} in L^1 implies e^{XY} in L^1$
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{|XY|}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx \
&= frac{1}{2pi}[int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx]\
& leq text{Constant}[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] + mathbb{E}[e^{-XY}] ] = text{Constant}_2[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}]]
end{align} $$
I used the fact that $-X$ and $Y$ are independant and that $X = -X, text{in distribution}$
Q2 :
was my attempt at proving 2nd equivalence correct ?
thanks !
edit 1 : pic of the original problem (it's in french)
probability-theory lp-spaces expected-value
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
1
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42
|
show 10 more comments
$begingroup$
let $X, Y$ be two identically distributed (both are $mathcal{N}(0,1)$) independent random variables
show that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 iff e^{|XY|} in L^1$.
my attempt :
1st equivalence :
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx =frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{(x-y)^2}{2}}dydx \
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-frac{u^2}{2}}dudx \
& = mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]
end{align} $$
I mean yeah this kinda proves that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 $
but something is bothering me,
because $mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}] = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}dx = +infty$
Q1 :
can't we just say that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1$ is a false claim therefore it can imply anything we desire ?
second equivalence : from the fact that $0< e^{XY} leq e^{|XY|}$
we conclude that $ e^{|XY|} in L^1 implies e^{XY} in L^1$
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{|XY|}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx \
&= frac{1}{2pi}[int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx]\
& leq text{Constant}[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] + mathbb{E}[e^{-XY}] ] = text{Constant}_2[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}]]
end{align} $$
I used the fact that $-X$ and $Y$ are independant and that $X = -X, text{in distribution}$
Q2 :
was my attempt at proving 2nd equivalence correct ?
thanks !
edit 1 : pic of the original problem (it's in french)
probability-theory lp-spaces expected-value
$endgroup$
let $X, Y$ be two identically distributed (both are $mathcal{N}(0,1)$) independent random variables
show that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 iff e^{|XY|} in L^1$.
my attempt :
1st equivalence :
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx =frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{xy-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{(x-y)^2}{2}}dydx \
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-frac{u^2}{2}}dudx \
& = mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]
end{align} $$
I mean yeah this kinda proves that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1 iff e^{XY} in L^1 $
but something is bothering me,
because $mathbb{E}[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}] = frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}dx = +infty$
Q1 :
can't we just say that $e^{frac{X^2}{2}} in L^1$ is a false claim therefore it can imply anything we desire ?
second equivalence : from the fact that $0< e^{XY} leq e^{|XY|}$
we conclude that $ e^{|XY|} in L^1 implies e^{XY} in L^1$
$$begin{align}
mathbb{E}[e^{|XY|}] &= frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dydx \
&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx \
&= frac{1}{2pi}[int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{-frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{0}^{+infty}e^{-xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy +int_{-infty}^{0}e^{xy}e^{-frac{y^2}{2}}dy)dx]\
& leq text{Constant}[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}] + mathbb{E}[e^{-XY}] ] = text{Constant}_2[mathbb{E}[e^{XY}]]
end{align} $$
I used the fact that $-X$ and $Y$ are independant and that $X = -X, text{in distribution}$
Q2 :
was my attempt at proving 2nd equivalence correct ?
thanks !
edit 1 : pic of the original problem (it's in french)
probability-theory lp-spaces expected-value
probability-theory lp-spaces expected-value
edited Feb 1 at 22:44
Did
249k23228466
249k23228466
asked Feb 1 at 17:44


rapidracimrapidracim
1,7441419
1,7441419
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
1
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42
|
show 10 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
1
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42
1
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
1
1
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42
|
show 10 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$E[e^{XY}|X]$ exists since $0 leq e^{XY}$ (it's an extension from $L^2$ to non negative variables!!)
Let's suppose that we don't know the distribution of $X$. And suppose that $E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$
Observe that:
$$frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{1}{2}y^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]0;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}(y-|x|)^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]-|x|;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq 2E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$$
And then the equivalence!! (the exercise is true if the distribution of $X$ is unknown)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096530%2fshow-that-ex2-2-in-l1-iff-exy-in-l1-iff-exy-in-l1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$E[e^{XY}|X]$ exists since $0 leq e^{XY}$ (it's an extension from $L^2$ to non negative variables!!)
Let's suppose that we don't know the distribution of $X$. And suppose that $E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$
Observe that:
$$frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{1}{2}y^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]0;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}(y-|x|)^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]-|x|;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq 2E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$$
And then the equivalence!! (the exercise is true if the distribution of $X$ is unknown)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$E[e^{XY}|X]$ exists since $0 leq e^{XY}$ (it's an extension from $L^2$ to non negative variables!!)
Let's suppose that we don't know the distribution of $X$. And suppose that $E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$
Observe that:
$$frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{1}{2}y^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]0;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}(y-|x|)^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]-|x|;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq 2E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$$
And then the equivalence!! (the exercise is true if the distribution of $X$ is unknown)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$E[e^{XY}|X]$ exists since $0 leq e^{XY}$ (it's an extension from $L^2$ to non negative variables!!)
Let's suppose that we don't know the distribution of $X$. And suppose that $E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$
Observe that:
$$frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{1}{2}y^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]0;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}(y-|x|)^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]-|x|;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq 2E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$$
And then the equivalence!! (the exercise is true if the distribution of $X$ is unknown)
$endgroup$
$E[e^{XY}|X]$ exists since $0 leq e^{XY}$ (it's an extension from $L^2$ to non negative variables!!)
Let's suppose that we don't know the distribution of $X$. And suppose that $E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$
Observe that:
$$frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{|xy|}e^{-frac{1}{2}y^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]0;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}(y-|x|)^2}dy)dP_X(x)=frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{]-|x|;+infty[}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq frac{2}{sqrt{2pi}}int_{mathbb{R}}e^{frac{x^2}{2}}(int_{mathbb{R}}e^{-frac{1}{2}u^2}du)dP_X(x) leq 2E[e^{frac{X^2}{2}}]<+infty$$
And then the equivalence!! (the exercise is true if the distribution of $X$ is unknown)
answered Feb 2 at 9:28
mathexmathex
1138
1138
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
great detail concerning the distribution of $X$
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:35
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
From where did you bring the exercise?
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:36
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
We don't need to know the distribution of X. So the exercise is true!
$endgroup$
– mathex
Feb 2 at 9:38
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
$begingroup$
it's from an exam, the teacher said he found it in this book : amazon.fr/…
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 2 at 9:42
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096530%2fshow-that-ex2-2-in-l1-iff-exy-in-l1-iff-exy-in-l1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure you were asked to prove these (rather odd) equivalences, or did you make them up yourself, to solve another problem?
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
@Did here is a pic (imgur.com/a/5AgV1c8) of the problem, it's from an exam. calculer means 'compute', montrer que means 'show that', sans means 'without' and $M_x$ here denotes the moment generating function
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 21:36
$begingroup$
"Click below to consent to the use of this technology across the web" No thanks.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:18
$begingroup$
@Did link is messy ? I added the pic to my post for more convenience.
$endgroup$
– rapidracim
Feb 1 at 22:31
1
$begingroup$
Hmmm... Actually the whole exercise is wrong since, the random variable $e^{XY}$ failing to be integrable, the conditional expectation $E(e^{XY}mid X)$ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 1 at 22:42