Does a given First Passage Time Distribution imply a single possible Fokker-Planck equation?
$begingroup$
Consider a 1-dimensional Continuous Markov Process $X(t)$ with fixed and constant absorbing boundaries, let's say at $pm theta$, and with starting point at $X(t=0)=0$. This setting will lead to a given First Passage Time (FPT) distribution at each boundary. Let us call the densities $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ respectively.
Suppose now that one could change the value of $theta$ and obtain the family of FPT distributions for all possible values of $theta$ (doesn't really matter whether one can obtain a parametric form or not). My question is, then: Would this family of distributions $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ imply the unicity of the underlying Fokker-Planck equation (or equivalently the form of the drift and diffusion coefficients $A(x,t)$ and $D(x,t)$)? My intuition tells me this must be the case, but I haven't found a theorem or a way to prove this claim.
Bonus question: Would this extend to a 2-dimensional case?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus markov-process
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a 1-dimensional Continuous Markov Process $X(t)$ with fixed and constant absorbing boundaries, let's say at $pm theta$, and with starting point at $X(t=0)=0$. This setting will lead to a given First Passage Time (FPT) distribution at each boundary. Let us call the densities $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ respectively.
Suppose now that one could change the value of $theta$ and obtain the family of FPT distributions for all possible values of $theta$ (doesn't really matter whether one can obtain a parametric form or not). My question is, then: Would this family of distributions $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ imply the unicity of the underlying Fokker-Planck equation (or equivalently the form of the drift and diffusion coefficients $A(x,t)$ and $D(x,t)$)? My intuition tells me this must be the case, but I haven't found a theorem or a way to prove this claim.
Bonus question: Would this extend to a 2-dimensional case?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus markov-process
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a 1-dimensional Continuous Markov Process $X(t)$ with fixed and constant absorbing boundaries, let's say at $pm theta$, and with starting point at $X(t=0)=0$. This setting will lead to a given First Passage Time (FPT) distribution at each boundary. Let us call the densities $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ respectively.
Suppose now that one could change the value of $theta$ and obtain the family of FPT distributions for all possible values of $theta$ (doesn't really matter whether one can obtain a parametric form or not). My question is, then: Would this family of distributions $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ imply the unicity of the underlying Fokker-Planck equation (or equivalently the form of the drift and diffusion coefficients $A(x,t)$ and $D(x,t)$)? My intuition tells me this must be the case, but I haven't found a theorem or a way to prove this claim.
Bonus question: Would this extend to a 2-dimensional case?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus markov-process
$endgroup$
Consider a 1-dimensional Continuous Markov Process $X(t)$ with fixed and constant absorbing boundaries, let's say at $pm theta$, and with starting point at $X(t=0)=0$. This setting will lead to a given First Passage Time (FPT) distribution at each boundary. Let us call the densities $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ respectively.
Suppose now that one could change the value of $theta$ and obtain the family of FPT distributions for all possible values of $theta$ (doesn't really matter whether one can obtain a parametric form or not). My question is, then: Would this family of distributions $g_{pm}(t,pm theta)$ imply the unicity of the underlying Fokker-Planck equation (or equivalently the form of the drift and diffusion coefficients $A(x,t)$ and $D(x,t)$)? My intuition tells me this must be the case, but I haven't found a theorem or a way to prove this claim.
Bonus question: Would this extend to a 2-dimensional case?
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus markov-process
stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus markov-process
asked Jan 16 at 11:15
J. R. C.J. R. C.
718
718
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075610%2fdoes-a-given-first-passage-time-distribution-imply-a-single-possible-fokker-plan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075610%2fdoes-a-given-first-passage-time-distribution-imply-a-single-possible-fokker-plan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown