Schur-convexity of multinomial distribution












0














Consider ${p_i in [0,c]}_i$, $c<1$, such that $sum_{i=1}^{k} p_i = P$ for some positive $k>2$ and constant $P < 1$. Let $(x_i in mathbb{N})_i$. Is
$$f(p_1,ldots,p_k)
= sum_{x_1,x_2,ldots,x_k=0}^{c} frac{p_1^{x_1}}{x_1} frac{p_2^{x_2}}{x_2!}
cdots
frac{p_k^{x_k}}{x_k!}
$$

Schur-concave in ${p_i}$?
The function is symmetric, but it is a bit hard to check the cond $partial f/partial p_i - partial f/partial p_j$. Any suggestion?



PS: The function is similar to the marginal of a Multinomial distribution.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45










  • edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:57










  • then the answer is trivial, right?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:15










  • you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:56
















0














Consider ${p_i in [0,c]}_i$, $c<1$, such that $sum_{i=1}^{k} p_i = P$ for some positive $k>2$ and constant $P < 1$. Let $(x_i in mathbb{N})_i$. Is
$$f(p_1,ldots,p_k)
= sum_{x_1,x_2,ldots,x_k=0}^{c} frac{p_1^{x_1}}{x_1} frac{p_2^{x_2}}{x_2!}
cdots
frac{p_k^{x_k}}{x_k!}
$$

Schur-concave in ${p_i}$?
The function is symmetric, but it is a bit hard to check the cond $partial f/partial p_i - partial f/partial p_j$. Any suggestion?



PS: The function is similar to the marginal of a Multinomial distribution.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45










  • edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:57










  • then the answer is trivial, right?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:15










  • you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:56














0












0








0







Consider ${p_i in [0,c]}_i$, $c<1$, such that $sum_{i=1}^{k} p_i = P$ for some positive $k>2$ and constant $P < 1$. Let $(x_i in mathbb{N})_i$. Is
$$f(p_1,ldots,p_k)
= sum_{x_1,x_2,ldots,x_k=0}^{c} frac{p_1^{x_1}}{x_1} frac{p_2^{x_2}}{x_2!}
cdots
frac{p_k^{x_k}}{x_k!}
$$

Schur-concave in ${p_i}$?
The function is symmetric, but it is a bit hard to check the cond $partial f/partial p_i - partial f/partial p_j$. Any suggestion?



PS: The function is similar to the marginal of a Multinomial distribution.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider ${p_i in [0,c]}_i$, $c<1$, such that $sum_{i=1}^{k} p_i = P$ for some positive $k>2$ and constant $P < 1$. Let $(x_i in mathbb{N})_i$. Is
$$f(p_1,ldots,p_k)
= sum_{x_1,x_2,ldots,x_k=0}^{c} frac{p_1^{x_1}}{x_1} frac{p_2^{x_2}}{x_2!}
cdots
frac{p_k^{x_k}}{x_k!}
$$

Schur-concave in ${p_i}$?
The function is symmetric, but it is a bit hard to check the cond $partial f/partial p_i - partial f/partial p_j$. Any suggestion?



PS: The function is similar to the marginal of a Multinomial distribution.







statistics convex-analysis convex-optimization






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 18:54

























asked Nov 20 '18 at 14:20









Jeff

1838




1838












  • What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45










  • edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:57










  • then the answer is trivial, right?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:15










  • you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:56


















  • What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:45










  • edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:57










  • then the answer is trivial, right?
    – LinAlg
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:15










  • you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
    – Jeff
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:56
















What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
– LinAlg
Nov 20 '18 at 14:45




What is the domain of $f$? Positive or also negative input?
– LinAlg
Nov 20 '18 at 14:45












edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
– Jeff
Nov 20 '18 at 14:57




edited the question accordingly. ${p_i}'s$ are probability simplex.
– Jeff
Nov 20 '18 at 14:57












then the answer is trivial, right?
– LinAlg
Nov 20 '18 at 15:15




then the answer is trivial, right?
– LinAlg
Nov 20 '18 at 15:15












you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
– Jeff
Nov 20 '18 at 18:56




you were right. Actually, it should be Schur-concave, and also I had a summation, which was missing in the original question. Now, it is not trivial to me whether it is Schur-concave or not...
– Jeff
Nov 20 '18 at 18:56










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006362%2fschur-convexity-of-multinomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006362%2fschur-convexity-of-multinomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$