Read file to istream replacing class variables












1















I understand how to implement a overloaded ostream operator but I'm a little confused on a overloaded istream operator. All the examples online only show a brief demonstration (i.e. is >> val; ) which doesn't help me in context with my class variables and methods. In my main, I'm trying to read in a file and replace the pointers contents with the file contents. I have a factory method and read method that does that already but I'm trying to overload my istream operator to do the same. However, although the pointers contents are replaced, I still receive the cerr message below. Am I supposed to pass something to the ifs in my >> function?



Here is my main



int main() {

// factory method instantiates all class variables
Base *aa = Base::create(file); // it works

ifstream in(file2);
if((in >> *aa).fail()) // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';

cout << *aa; // prints vector contents
}


Prints



// file     // file2      cout << *aa     SupposedToBe
555 111 Read Failed 111
555 222 111 222
555 333 222 333
333


What I have so far (.cpp)



istream &operator>>(istream &ifs, Base &val) {

string line;
getline(ifs, line); // type of file

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

// read remaining contents
while(getline(ifs, line)) {

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
inner.push_back(line[i]);

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}


My overloaded ostream function looks a lot different that what is displayed above (i.e. lots of os << value). But, whenever I do ifs >> value, I get all kinds of compiler errors (i.e. I tried just doing ifs >> val.image; ifs >> val.height; etc. but all I got was compiler errors). What am I supposed to pass to the istream (in the above function) so the error above (below main) doesn't display.



.h file for reference



class Base 
{
protected:
std::vector<std::vector<int> > vec;
std::string filetype;
int width, height, max;
Base() = default;
Base &operator=(const Base &) = default;
public:
static Base* create(std::string filename);
virtual ~Base();
// read by derived class
virtual void read(std::string filename) = 0;
friend std::istream &operator>>(std::istream &, Base &);
friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, const Image &);
};









share|improve this question

























  • Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

    – Neil Butterworth
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:01











  • To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

    – Christopher Pisz
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:02













  • I added it. It's below main.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:04
















1















I understand how to implement a overloaded ostream operator but I'm a little confused on a overloaded istream operator. All the examples online only show a brief demonstration (i.e. is >> val; ) which doesn't help me in context with my class variables and methods. In my main, I'm trying to read in a file and replace the pointers contents with the file contents. I have a factory method and read method that does that already but I'm trying to overload my istream operator to do the same. However, although the pointers contents are replaced, I still receive the cerr message below. Am I supposed to pass something to the ifs in my >> function?



Here is my main



int main() {

// factory method instantiates all class variables
Base *aa = Base::create(file); // it works

ifstream in(file2);
if((in >> *aa).fail()) // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';

cout << *aa; // prints vector contents
}


Prints



// file     // file2      cout << *aa     SupposedToBe
555 111 Read Failed 111
555 222 111 222
555 333 222 333
333


What I have so far (.cpp)



istream &operator>>(istream &ifs, Base &val) {

string line;
getline(ifs, line); // type of file

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

// read remaining contents
while(getline(ifs, line)) {

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
inner.push_back(line[i]);

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}


My overloaded ostream function looks a lot different that what is displayed above (i.e. lots of os << value). But, whenever I do ifs >> value, I get all kinds of compiler errors (i.e. I tried just doing ifs >> val.image; ifs >> val.height; etc. but all I got was compiler errors). What am I supposed to pass to the istream (in the above function) so the error above (below main) doesn't display.



.h file for reference



class Base 
{
protected:
std::vector<std::vector<int> > vec;
std::string filetype;
int width, height, max;
Base() = default;
Base &operator=(const Base &) = default;
public:
static Base* create(std::string filename);
virtual ~Base();
// read by derived class
virtual void read(std::string filename) = 0;
friend std::istream &operator>>(std::istream &, Base &);
friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, const Image &);
};









share|improve this question

























  • Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

    – Neil Butterworth
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:01











  • To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

    – Christopher Pisz
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:02













  • I added it. It's below main.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:04














1












1








1








I understand how to implement a overloaded ostream operator but I'm a little confused on a overloaded istream operator. All the examples online only show a brief demonstration (i.e. is >> val; ) which doesn't help me in context with my class variables and methods. In my main, I'm trying to read in a file and replace the pointers contents with the file contents. I have a factory method and read method that does that already but I'm trying to overload my istream operator to do the same. However, although the pointers contents are replaced, I still receive the cerr message below. Am I supposed to pass something to the ifs in my >> function?



Here is my main



int main() {

// factory method instantiates all class variables
Base *aa = Base::create(file); // it works

ifstream in(file2);
if((in >> *aa).fail()) // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';

cout << *aa; // prints vector contents
}


Prints



// file     // file2      cout << *aa     SupposedToBe
555 111 Read Failed 111
555 222 111 222
555 333 222 333
333


What I have so far (.cpp)



istream &operator>>(istream &ifs, Base &val) {

string line;
getline(ifs, line); // type of file

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

// read remaining contents
while(getline(ifs, line)) {

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
inner.push_back(line[i]);

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}


My overloaded ostream function looks a lot different that what is displayed above (i.e. lots of os << value). But, whenever I do ifs >> value, I get all kinds of compiler errors (i.e. I tried just doing ifs >> val.image; ifs >> val.height; etc. but all I got was compiler errors). What am I supposed to pass to the istream (in the above function) so the error above (below main) doesn't display.



.h file for reference



class Base 
{
protected:
std::vector<std::vector<int> > vec;
std::string filetype;
int width, height, max;
Base() = default;
Base &operator=(const Base &) = default;
public:
static Base* create(std::string filename);
virtual ~Base();
// read by derived class
virtual void read(std::string filename) = 0;
friend std::istream &operator>>(std::istream &, Base &);
friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, const Image &);
};









share|improve this question
















I understand how to implement a overloaded ostream operator but I'm a little confused on a overloaded istream operator. All the examples online only show a brief demonstration (i.e. is >> val; ) which doesn't help me in context with my class variables and methods. In my main, I'm trying to read in a file and replace the pointers contents with the file contents. I have a factory method and read method that does that already but I'm trying to overload my istream operator to do the same. However, although the pointers contents are replaced, I still receive the cerr message below. Am I supposed to pass something to the ifs in my >> function?



Here is my main



int main() {

// factory method instantiates all class variables
Base *aa = Base::create(file); // it works

ifstream in(file2);
if((in >> *aa).fail()) // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';

cout << *aa; // prints vector contents
}


Prints



// file     // file2      cout << *aa     SupposedToBe
555 111 Read Failed 111
555 222 111 222
555 333 222 333
333


What I have so far (.cpp)



istream &operator>>(istream &ifs, Base &val) {

string line;
getline(ifs, line); // type of file

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

// read remaining contents
while(getline(ifs, line)) {

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
inner.push_back(line[i]);

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}


My overloaded ostream function looks a lot different that what is displayed above (i.e. lots of os << value). But, whenever I do ifs >> value, I get all kinds of compiler errors (i.e. I tried just doing ifs >> val.image; ifs >> val.height; etc. but all I got was compiler errors). What am I supposed to pass to the istream (in the above function) so the error above (below main) doesn't display.



.h file for reference



class Base 
{
protected:
std::vector<std::vector<int> > vec;
std::string filetype;
int width, height, max;
Base() = default;
Base &operator=(const Base &) = default;
public:
static Base* create(std::string filename);
virtual ~Base();
// read by derived class
virtual void read(std::string filename) = 0;
friend std::istream &operator>>(std::istream &, Base &);
friend std::ostream &operator<<(std::ostream &, const Image &);
};






c++ istream






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:31







N. Colostate

















asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:56









N. ColostateN. Colostate

356




356













  • Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

    – Neil Butterworth
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:01











  • To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

    – Christopher Pisz
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:02













  • I added it. It's below main.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:04



















  • Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

    – Neil Butterworth
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:01











  • To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

    – Christopher Pisz
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:02













  • I added it. It's below main.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:04

















Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

– Neil Butterworth
Nov 21 '18 at 23:01





Base *aa = Base::create(file); - don't do that - no need to use a pointer.

– Neil Butterworth
Nov 21 '18 at 23:01













To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

– Christopher Pisz
Nov 21 '18 at 23:02







To be a real complete example, we also need your input file please.

– Christopher Pisz
Nov 21 '18 at 23:02















I added it. It's below main.

– N. Colostate
Nov 21 '18 at 23:04





I added it. It's below main.

– N. Colostate
Nov 21 '18 at 23:04












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Use of



if((in >> *aa).fail())             // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';


is a problem. The way you have implemenented operator>>(std::istream &, Base &), that logic is bound to fail every time.



You have a loop in the function



while(getline(ifs, line)) {
...
}


That loop will break only when there is nothing to read from the file or there is an error in reading the contents of the file. When that loop exits, ifs.fail() will always be true.



You should replace the if statement with just:



in >> *aa;


If you need to do any error checking and print appropriate error messages, that has to be done inside operator>>(std::istream &, Base &).



Update, in response to OP's comment



One way to make sure that the istream does not get to the point where ifs.fail() is always true is to know what's expected ahead of time.



If the number of lines expected in the file is the first input, then, it is possible to read all the data and return from the function such that ifs.fail() is false.



Sample input:



type1
3
111
222
333


Then, the oprator>> function can be defined as:



std::stream& operator>>(std::istream& ifs, Base& val) 
{
std::string line;
if ( !getline(ifs, line) ) // type of file
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

// read remaining contents

int numLines = 0;
if ( !(ifs >> numLines) )
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

for ( int n = 0; n < numLines; ++n )
{
if ( !getline(ifs, line))
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
{
inner.push_back(line[i]);
}

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:26













  • Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

    – R Sahu
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:38











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53421600%2fread-file-to-istream-replacing-class-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Use of



if((in >> *aa).fail())             // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';


is a problem. The way you have implemenented operator>>(std::istream &, Base &), that logic is bound to fail every time.



You have a loop in the function



while(getline(ifs, line)) {
...
}


That loop will break only when there is nothing to read from the file or there is an error in reading the contents of the file. When that loop exits, ifs.fail() will always be true.



You should replace the if statement with just:



in >> *aa;


If you need to do any error checking and print appropriate error messages, that has to be done inside operator>>(std::istream &, Base &).



Update, in response to OP's comment



One way to make sure that the istream does not get to the point where ifs.fail() is always true is to know what's expected ahead of time.



If the number of lines expected in the file is the first input, then, it is possible to read all the data and return from the function such that ifs.fail() is false.



Sample input:



type1
3
111
222
333


Then, the oprator>> function can be defined as:



std::stream& operator>>(std::istream& ifs, Base& val) 
{
std::string line;
if ( !getline(ifs, line) ) // type of file
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

// read remaining contents

int numLines = 0;
if ( !(ifs >> numLines) )
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

for ( int n = 0; n < numLines; ++n )
{
if ( !getline(ifs, line))
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
{
inner.push_back(line[i]);
}

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:26













  • Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

    – R Sahu
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:38
















3














Use of



if((in >> *aa).fail())             // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';


is a problem. The way you have implemenented operator>>(std::istream &, Base &), that logic is bound to fail every time.



You have a loop in the function



while(getline(ifs, line)) {
...
}


That loop will break only when there is nothing to read from the file or there is an error in reading the contents of the file. When that loop exits, ifs.fail() will always be true.



You should replace the if statement with just:



in >> *aa;


If you need to do any error checking and print appropriate error messages, that has to be done inside operator>>(std::istream &, Base &).



Update, in response to OP's comment



One way to make sure that the istream does not get to the point where ifs.fail() is always true is to know what's expected ahead of time.



If the number of lines expected in the file is the first input, then, it is possible to read all the data and return from the function such that ifs.fail() is false.



Sample input:



type1
3
111
222
333


Then, the oprator>> function can be defined as:



std::stream& operator>>(std::istream& ifs, Base& val) 
{
std::string line;
if ( !getline(ifs, line) ) // type of file
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

// read remaining contents

int numLines = 0;
if ( !(ifs >> numLines) )
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

for ( int n = 0; n < numLines; ++n )
{
if ( !getline(ifs, line))
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
{
inner.push_back(line[i]);
}

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:26













  • Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

    – R Sahu
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:38














3












3








3







Use of



if((in >> *aa).fail())             // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';


is a problem. The way you have implemenented operator>>(std::istream &, Base &), that logic is bound to fail every time.



You have a loop in the function



while(getline(ifs, line)) {
...
}


That loop will break only when there is nothing to read from the file or there is an error in reading the contents of the file. When that loop exits, ifs.fail() will always be true.



You should replace the if statement with just:



in >> *aa;


If you need to do any error checking and print appropriate error messages, that has to be done inside operator>>(std::istream &, Base &).



Update, in response to OP's comment



One way to make sure that the istream does not get to the point where ifs.fail() is always true is to know what's expected ahead of time.



If the number of lines expected in the file is the first input, then, it is possible to read all the data and return from the function such that ifs.fail() is false.



Sample input:



type1
3
111
222
333


Then, the oprator>> function can be defined as:



std::stream& operator>>(std::istream& ifs, Base& val) 
{
std::string line;
if ( !getline(ifs, line) ) // type of file
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

// read remaining contents

int numLines = 0;
if ( !(ifs >> numLines) )
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

for ( int n = 0; n < numLines; ++n )
{
if ( !getline(ifs, line))
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
{
inner.push_back(line[i]);
}

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}





share|improve this answer















Use of



if((in >> *aa).fail())             // Read file contents
cerr << "Read failed" << 'n';


is a problem. The way you have implemenented operator>>(std::istream &, Base &), that logic is bound to fail every time.



You have a loop in the function



while(getline(ifs, line)) {
...
}


That loop will break only when there is nothing to read from the file or there is an error in reading the contents of the file. When that loop exits, ifs.fail() will always be true.



You should replace the if statement with just:



in >> *aa;


If you need to do any error checking and print appropriate error messages, that has to be done inside operator>>(std::istream &, Base &).



Update, in response to OP's comment



One way to make sure that the istream does not get to the point where ifs.fail() is always true is to know what's expected ahead of time.



If the number of lines expected in the file is the first input, then, it is possible to read all the data and return from the function such that ifs.fail() is false.



Sample input:



type1
3
111
222
333


Then, the oprator>> function can be defined as:



std::stream& operator>>(std::istream& ifs, Base& val) 
{
std::string line;
if ( !getline(ifs, line) ) // type of file
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

if(line == "type1")
val.filetype = "type1";
if(line == "type2")
val.filetype = "type2";

// read remaining contents

int numLines = 0;
if ( !(ifs >> numLines) )
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

val.vec.clear(); // clear old vector
vector<int> inner; // inner vec to push onto main vec

for ( int n = 0; n < numLines; ++n )
{
if ( !getline(ifs, line))
{
// Problem reading. No point trying to read more.
return ifs;
}

for(size_t i = 0; i < line.length(); i++)
{
inner.push_back(line[i]);
}

val.vec.push_back(inner);
inner.clear();
}

val.height = val.vec.size();
val.width = val.vec[0].size();
val.max = val.vec[height-1][width-1];

return ifs;
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 22 '18 at 4:07

























answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:09









R SahuR Sahu

167k1292190




167k1292190













  • Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:26













  • Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

    – R Sahu
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:38



















  • Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

    – N. Colostate
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:26













  • Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

    – R Sahu
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:38

















Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

– N. Colostate
Nov 21 '18 at 23:26







Is there a way to fix my logic in my operator>> function so that it doesn't fail? in >> *aa; works without error, but I need to use the if-statement you highlighted in your response.

– N. Colostate
Nov 21 '18 at 23:26















Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

– R Sahu
Nov 21 '18 at 23:38





Yes. The full response I have in mind is lengthy and I can't get to it for a few hours.

– R Sahu
Nov 21 '18 at 23:38




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53421600%2fread-file-to-istream-replacing-class-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

SQL update select statement

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules