Is $1/x$ a descending function?
$begingroup$
It is descending on all its connected components, but not as a function, right?
But on the other hand the $f'(x) = -x^{-2} < 0$, then it should be descending, what am I missing?
functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is descending on all its connected components, but not as a function, right?
But on the other hand the $f'(x) = -x^{-2} < 0$, then it should be descending, what am I missing?
functions
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is descending on all its connected components, but not as a function, right?
But on the other hand the $f'(x) = -x^{-2} < 0$, then it should be descending, what am I missing?
functions
$endgroup$
It is descending on all its connected components, but not as a function, right?
But on the other hand the $f'(x) = -x^{-2} < 0$, then it should be descending, what am I missing?
functions
functions
edited Jan 16 at 8:24


Le Anh Dung
1,2071621
1,2071621
asked Jan 16 at 8:15


Jake B.Jake B.
1666
1666
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The theorem about the relationship between the monotony of $f$ and the sign of $f'$ has to be applied to an interval (a connected set in $mathbb{R}$). Indeed, reading its proof, we have that for $x_1<x_2$, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $tin (x_1,x_2)$ such that
$$f(x_2)-f(x_1)=f'(t)(x_2-x_1)$$
So $f(x_2)geq f(x_1)$ if and only if $f'(t)geq 0$.
Here, in order to apply the Mean Value Theorem, we need $f$ to be a continuous function on the closed interval $[x_1,x_2]$ and differentiable on the open interval $(x_1,x_2)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem which says that $f'(x)<0$ for all $x in I$ implies $f$ is decreasing on $I$ is applicable only when the function is defined and differentiable on that interval. Since your function is not defined at $0$ you cannot apply that theorem to any interval containing $0$. Of course, the function is decreasing in $(0,infty)$ as well as $(-infty,0)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac{1}{x}$ is not defined when $x=0$, so when $x > 0$ it might not be decreasing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $$f(-1)=-1<1=f(1).$$ Thus $f$ is not decreasing. Is there a contradiction with $f'(x)<0?$ No, since $f$ is not defined at $x=0.$
The domain of $f$ is $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$ Since $f'<0$ all we can say is that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)$ and on $(0,infty).$ But this doesn't imply that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
graph of 1/x
As you can see from the graph of 1/x , its not defined at 0 but decreasing for other values of x since y'=-(1/x^2)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Graphical approach"
When you look at graph of $1/x$ you can mark the point for which function not decrease?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075453%2fis-1-x-a-descending-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The theorem about the relationship between the monotony of $f$ and the sign of $f'$ has to be applied to an interval (a connected set in $mathbb{R}$). Indeed, reading its proof, we have that for $x_1<x_2$, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $tin (x_1,x_2)$ such that
$$f(x_2)-f(x_1)=f'(t)(x_2-x_1)$$
So $f(x_2)geq f(x_1)$ if and only if $f'(t)geq 0$.
Here, in order to apply the Mean Value Theorem, we need $f$ to be a continuous function on the closed interval $[x_1,x_2]$ and differentiable on the open interval $(x_1,x_2)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem about the relationship between the monotony of $f$ and the sign of $f'$ has to be applied to an interval (a connected set in $mathbb{R}$). Indeed, reading its proof, we have that for $x_1<x_2$, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $tin (x_1,x_2)$ such that
$$f(x_2)-f(x_1)=f'(t)(x_2-x_1)$$
So $f(x_2)geq f(x_1)$ if and only if $f'(t)geq 0$.
Here, in order to apply the Mean Value Theorem, we need $f$ to be a continuous function on the closed interval $[x_1,x_2]$ and differentiable on the open interval $(x_1,x_2)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem about the relationship between the monotony of $f$ and the sign of $f'$ has to be applied to an interval (a connected set in $mathbb{R}$). Indeed, reading its proof, we have that for $x_1<x_2$, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $tin (x_1,x_2)$ such that
$$f(x_2)-f(x_1)=f'(t)(x_2-x_1)$$
So $f(x_2)geq f(x_1)$ if and only if $f'(t)geq 0$.
Here, in order to apply the Mean Value Theorem, we need $f$ to be a continuous function on the closed interval $[x_1,x_2]$ and differentiable on the open interval $(x_1,x_2)$.
$endgroup$
The theorem about the relationship between the monotony of $f$ and the sign of $f'$ has to be applied to an interval (a connected set in $mathbb{R}$). Indeed, reading its proof, we have that for $x_1<x_2$, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $tin (x_1,x_2)$ such that
$$f(x_2)-f(x_1)=f'(t)(x_2-x_1)$$
So $f(x_2)geq f(x_1)$ if and only if $f'(t)geq 0$.
Here, in order to apply the Mean Value Theorem, we need $f$ to be a continuous function on the closed interval $[x_1,x_2]$ and differentiable on the open interval $(x_1,x_2)$.
edited Jan 22 at 3:42


Pang
13916
13916
answered Jan 16 at 8:17


Robert ZRobert Z
98.5k1068139
98.5k1068139
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem which says that $f'(x)<0$ for all $x in I$ implies $f$ is decreasing on $I$ is applicable only when the function is defined and differentiable on that interval. Since your function is not defined at $0$ you cannot apply that theorem to any interval containing $0$. Of course, the function is decreasing in $(0,infty)$ as well as $(-infty,0)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem which says that $f'(x)<0$ for all $x in I$ implies $f$ is decreasing on $I$ is applicable only when the function is defined and differentiable on that interval. Since your function is not defined at $0$ you cannot apply that theorem to any interval containing $0$. Of course, the function is decreasing in $(0,infty)$ as well as $(-infty,0)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The theorem which says that $f'(x)<0$ for all $x in I$ implies $f$ is decreasing on $I$ is applicable only when the function is defined and differentiable on that interval. Since your function is not defined at $0$ you cannot apply that theorem to any interval containing $0$. Of course, the function is decreasing in $(0,infty)$ as well as $(-infty,0)$.
$endgroup$
The theorem which says that $f'(x)<0$ for all $x in I$ implies $f$ is decreasing on $I$ is applicable only when the function is defined and differentiable on that interval. Since your function is not defined at $0$ you cannot apply that theorem to any interval containing $0$. Of course, the function is decreasing in $(0,infty)$ as well as $(-infty,0)$.
answered Jan 16 at 8:18


Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
61.7k42262
61.7k42262
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac{1}{x}$ is not defined when $x=0$, so when $x > 0$ it might not be decreasing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac{1}{x}$ is not defined when $x=0$, so when $x > 0$ it might not be decreasing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$frac{1}{x}$ is not defined when $x=0$, so when $x > 0$ it might not be decreasing.
$endgroup$
$frac{1}{x}$ is not defined when $x=0$, so when $x > 0$ it might not be decreasing.
answered Jan 16 at 8:17
Toby MakToby Mak
3,52311128
3,52311128
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $$f(-1)=-1<1=f(1).$$ Thus $f$ is not decreasing. Is there a contradiction with $f'(x)<0?$ No, since $f$ is not defined at $x=0.$
The domain of $f$ is $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$ Since $f'<0$ all we can say is that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)$ and on $(0,infty).$ But this doesn't imply that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $$f(-1)=-1<1=f(1).$$ Thus $f$ is not decreasing. Is there a contradiction with $f'(x)<0?$ No, since $f$ is not defined at $x=0.$
The domain of $f$ is $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$ Since $f'<0$ all we can say is that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)$ and on $(0,infty).$ But this doesn't imply that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that $$f(-1)=-1<1=f(1).$$ Thus $f$ is not decreasing. Is there a contradiction with $f'(x)<0?$ No, since $f$ is not defined at $x=0.$
The domain of $f$ is $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$ Since $f'<0$ all we can say is that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)$ and on $(0,infty).$ But this doesn't imply that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$
$endgroup$
Note that $$f(-1)=-1<1=f(1).$$ Thus $f$ is not decreasing. Is there a contradiction with $f'(x)<0?$ No, since $f$ is not defined at $x=0.$
The domain of $f$ is $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$ Since $f'<0$ all we can say is that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)$ and on $(0,infty).$ But this doesn't imply that $f$ is decreasing on $(-infty,0)cup (0,infty).$
answered Jan 16 at 8:19
mflmfl
26.6k12142
26.6k12142
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
graph of 1/x
As you can see from the graph of 1/x , its not defined at 0 but decreasing for other values of x since y'=-(1/x^2)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
graph of 1/x
As you can see from the graph of 1/x , its not defined at 0 but decreasing for other values of x since y'=-(1/x^2)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
graph of 1/x
As you can see from the graph of 1/x , its not defined at 0 but decreasing for other values of x since y'=-(1/x^2)
$endgroup$
graph of 1/x
As you can see from the graph of 1/x , its not defined at 0 but decreasing for other values of x since y'=-(1/x^2)
answered Jan 16 at 8:25
cognitivecognitive
264
264
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Graphical approach"
When you look at graph of $1/x$ you can mark the point for which function not decrease?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Graphical approach"
When you look at graph of $1/x$ you can mark the point for which function not decrease?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Graphical approach"
When you look at graph of $1/x$ you can mark the point for which function not decrease?
$endgroup$
"Graphical approach"
When you look at graph of $1/x$ you can mark the point for which function not decrease?
answered Jan 16 at 8:24


Kamil KiełczewskiKamil Kiełczewski
1267
1267
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075453%2fis-1-x-a-descending-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
it is not a function on all of $mathbb{R}$ hence asking for monotonous decreasing only makes sense on its domain, which is $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$
$endgroup$
– Enkidu
Jan 16 at 8:17