Show that $sum_{r=1}^infty frac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$
I'm asked to show that $displaystylesum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$, and am given the hint that for any $z in mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$ the series is uniform on some neighbourhood of $z$.
Someone has asked the same question here:
Showing $sum_{r=1}^infty frac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$
but I haven't been shown the result that the answer uses. Does anyone know a better way to do it?
I know I can use Morera's theorem to show that $displaystyleint_{gamma} sum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2} text{dz} = 0 $ for any closed path $gamma$, but I'm not sure how to justify exchanging the integral and the sum for any arbitrary path, when the convergence is only uniform on some neighbourhood of each point - not necessarily along the whole arbitrary closed path.
Thanks in advance.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis analysis derivatives holomorphic-functions
add a comment |
I'm asked to show that $displaystylesum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$, and am given the hint that for any $z in mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$ the series is uniform on some neighbourhood of $z$.
Someone has asked the same question here:
Showing $sum_{r=1}^infty frac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$
but I haven't been shown the result that the answer uses. Does anyone know a better way to do it?
I know I can use Morera's theorem to show that $displaystyleint_{gamma} sum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2} text{dz} = 0 $ for any closed path $gamma$, but I'm not sure how to justify exchanging the integral and the sum for any arbitrary path, when the convergence is only uniform on some neighbourhood of each point - not necessarily along the whole arbitrary closed path.
Thanks in advance.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis analysis derivatives holomorphic-functions
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
I'm asked to show that $displaystylesum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$, and am given the hint that for any $z in mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$ the series is uniform on some neighbourhood of $z$.
Someone has asked the same question here:
Showing $sum_{r=1}^infty frac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$
but I haven't been shown the result that the answer uses. Does anyone know a better way to do it?
I know I can use Morera's theorem to show that $displaystyleint_{gamma} sum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2} text{dz} = 0 $ for any closed path $gamma$, but I'm not sure how to justify exchanging the integral and the sum for any arbitrary path, when the convergence is only uniform on some neighbourhood of each point - not necessarily along the whole arbitrary closed path.
Thanks in advance.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis analysis derivatives holomorphic-functions
I'm asked to show that $displaystylesum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$, and am given the hint that for any $z in mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$ the series is uniform on some neighbourhood of $z$.
Someone has asked the same question here:
Showing $sum_{r=1}^infty frac{1}{(r-z)^2}$ is holomorphic on $mathbb{C}backslashmathbb{N}$
but I haven't been shown the result that the answer uses. Does anyone know a better way to do it?
I know I can use Morera's theorem to show that $displaystyleint_{gamma} sum_{r=1}^infty dfrac{1}{(r-z)^2} text{dz} = 0 $ for any closed path $gamma$, but I'm not sure how to justify exchanging the integral and the sum for any arbitrary path, when the convergence is only uniform on some neighbourhood of each point - not necessarily along the whole arbitrary closed path.
Thanks in advance.
sequences-and-series complex-analysis analysis derivatives holomorphic-functions
sequences-and-series complex-analysis analysis derivatives holomorphic-functions
edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:50
asked Nov 20 '18 at 14:13
fobena
11
11
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can use the following simpler fact. If
$f_n$ are holomorphic in $Omega$,
$f_nto f$ uniformly in $Omega$,
$f_n'to g$ uniformly in $Omega$,
then $f$ is holomorphic with $f'=g$.
Then check that with $f_n$ equal to the partial sum and $OmegaSubsetmathbb Csetminusmathbb N$ the assumptions are verified.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006354%2fshow-that-sum-r-1-infty-frac1r-z2-is-holomorphic-on-mathbbc-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use the following simpler fact. If
$f_n$ are holomorphic in $Omega$,
$f_nto f$ uniformly in $Omega$,
$f_n'to g$ uniformly in $Omega$,
then $f$ is holomorphic with $f'=g$.
Then check that with $f_n$ equal to the partial sum and $OmegaSubsetmathbb Csetminusmathbb N$ the assumptions are verified.
add a comment |
You can use the following simpler fact. If
$f_n$ are holomorphic in $Omega$,
$f_nto f$ uniformly in $Omega$,
$f_n'to g$ uniformly in $Omega$,
then $f$ is holomorphic with $f'=g$.
Then check that with $f_n$ equal to the partial sum and $OmegaSubsetmathbb Csetminusmathbb N$ the assumptions are verified.
add a comment |
You can use the following simpler fact. If
$f_n$ are holomorphic in $Omega$,
$f_nto f$ uniformly in $Omega$,
$f_n'to g$ uniformly in $Omega$,
then $f$ is holomorphic with $f'=g$.
Then check that with $f_n$ equal to the partial sum and $OmegaSubsetmathbb Csetminusmathbb N$ the assumptions are verified.
You can use the following simpler fact. If
$f_n$ are holomorphic in $Omega$,
$f_nto f$ uniformly in $Omega$,
$f_n'to g$ uniformly in $Omega$,
then $f$ is holomorphic with $f'=g$.
Then check that with $f_n$ equal to the partial sum and $OmegaSubsetmathbb Csetminusmathbb N$ the assumptions are verified.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 15:18
Federico
4,679514
4,679514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006354%2fshow-that-sum-r-1-infty-frac1r-z2-is-holomorphic-on-mathbbc-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If there already is an answer, it is probably easiest to understand the result used there.
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
HINT: Write $z=x+iy$ and verify Wirtinger's equations (equivalent to $overlinepartial f=0$).
– James
Nov 20 '18 at 15:11