When is an inclusion map smooth?
$begingroup$
- If $B$ is a manifold, and $Asubseteq B$ is a regular submanifold, then the inclusion map $i:Ato B$ is an embedding and thus smooth.
That $i$ is an embedding seems a bit strong. Is there another way to do this?
I seem to recall so far in learning differential geometry that inclusions are smooth specifically when doing compositions, but I can't find it upon looking through my notes. In general, for any manifold subset $A$ (a subset that is also a manifold but not necessarily a regular submanifold or immersed submanifold or neat submanifold, etc (I think not all irregular submanifolds are manifolds anyway)) of a manifold $B$, I know $i:A to B$ is continuous (assuming subspace topology), but when is $i:A to B$ smooth?
Upon second look of my notes, I found that it was true for the 'inclusion' $i_b: A to A times B, i_b(a)=a times b$ for fixed $b$. That's different from what I usually think of inclusion and instead more like this 'inclusion'.
Upon third look, I think many of those subset manifolds $A$ were open in $B$. Since open implies regular submanifold, all those compositions were safe, but we didn't have submanifolds then. I ask about this in another question.
Thanks in advance!
differential-geometry submanifold
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
- If $B$ is a manifold, and $Asubseteq B$ is a regular submanifold, then the inclusion map $i:Ato B$ is an embedding and thus smooth.
That $i$ is an embedding seems a bit strong. Is there another way to do this?
I seem to recall so far in learning differential geometry that inclusions are smooth specifically when doing compositions, but I can't find it upon looking through my notes. In general, for any manifold subset $A$ (a subset that is also a manifold but not necessarily a regular submanifold or immersed submanifold or neat submanifold, etc (I think not all irregular submanifolds are manifolds anyway)) of a manifold $B$, I know $i:A to B$ is continuous (assuming subspace topology), but when is $i:A to B$ smooth?
Upon second look of my notes, I found that it was true for the 'inclusion' $i_b: A to A times B, i_b(a)=a times b$ for fixed $b$. That's different from what I usually think of inclusion and instead more like this 'inclusion'.
Upon third look, I think many of those subset manifolds $A$ were open in $B$. Since open implies regular submanifold, all those compositions were safe, but we didn't have submanifolds then. I ask about this in another question.
Thanks in advance!
differential-geometry submanifold
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
1
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
1
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
- If $B$ is a manifold, and $Asubseteq B$ is a regular submanifold, then the inclusion map $i:Ato B$ is an embedding and thus smooth.
That $i$ is an embedding seems a bit strong. Is there another way to do this?
I seem to recall so far in learning differential geometry that inclusions are smooth specifically when doing compositions, but I can't find it upon looking through my notes. In general, for any manifold subset $A$ (a subset that is also a manifold but not necessarily a regular submanifold or immersed submanifold or neat submanifold, etc (I think not all irregular submanifolds are manifolds anyway)) of a manifold $B$, I know $i:A to B$ is continuous (assuming subspace topology), but when is $i:A to B$ smooth?
Upon second look of my notes, I found that it was true for the 'inclusion' $i_b: A to A times B, i_b(a)=a times b$ for fixed $b$. That's different from what I usually think of inclusion and instead more like this 'inclusion'.
Upon third look, I think many of those subset manifolds $A$ were open in $B$. Since open implies regular submanifold, all those compositions were safe, but we didn't have submanifolds then. I ask about this in another question.
Thanks in advance!
differential-geometry submanifold
$endgroup$
- If $B$ is a manifold, and $Asubseteq B$ is a regular submanifold, then the inclusion map $i:Ato B$ is an embedding and thus smooth.
That $i$ is an embedding seems a bit strong. Is there another way to do this?
I seem to recall so far in learning differential geometry that inclusions are smooth specifically when doing compositions, but I can't find it upon looking through my notes. In general, for any manifold subset $A$ (a subset that is also a manifold but not necessarily a regular submanifold or immersed submanifold or neat submanifold, etc (I think not all irregular submanifolds are manifolds anyway)) of a manifold $B$, I know $i:A to B$ is continuous (assuming subspace topology), but when is $i:A to B$ smooth?
Upon second look of my notes, I found that it was true for the 'inclusion' $i_b: A to A times B, i_b(a)=a times b$ for fixed $b$. That's different from what I usually think of inclusion and instead more like this 'inclusion'.
Upon third look, I think many of those subset manifolds $A$ were open in $B$. Since open implies regular submanifold, all those compositions were safe, but we didn't have submanifolds then. I ask about this in another question.
Thanks in advance!
differential-geometry submanifold
differential-geometry submanifold
edited Jan 20 at 9:25
user26857
39.3k124183
39.3k124183
asked Jan 18 at 11:17
Ekhin Taylor R. WilsonEkhin Taylor R. Wilson
558
558
1
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
1
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
1
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
1
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
1
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16
1
1
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
1
1
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
1
1
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
1
1
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078112%2fwhen-is-an-inclusion-map-smooth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078112%2fwhen-is-an-inclusion-map-smooth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The inclusion is the restriction of the identity map (which is smooth) to $A$. Do you claim that it may not be smooth? That's odd.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 18 at 12:09
$begingroup$
@Yanko I knew it had something to do with identity's being smooth! The thing is I saw a proof that said an inclusion was smooth because it was from a regular submanifold $A$, of a manifold $B$, to $B$. I was surprised. I thought identity and inclusion were always smooth (under subspace topology or some other obvious assumption) So is $i: A to B$ for $A$ and $B$ smooth manifolds and $A subseteq B$ always smooth whether $A$ is regular, immersed, neat or not even a submanifold?
$endgroup$
– Ekhin Taylor R. Wilson
Jan 19 at 17:08
1
$begingroup$
I think that the inclusion is smooth if and only if $A$ is an embedded submanifold, as strong as it may seem. Try looking in the book of Warner on differentiable manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:31
1
$begingroup$
@Yanko: math.stackexchange.com/q/2296838/8157 This is a typical example of a subset of $mathbb R^2$ that is a differentiable manifold but it is such that the inclusion is not smooth. I agree that these things are odd, though.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
"Inclusion is an embedding" surely implies "inclusion is smooth"; this is easy. In my previous comment I said that they are equivalent. I am not so sure anymore. You will have to search on books or on the net, unfortunately.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 19 at 18:16