Fréchet Derivative of functionals which depend on the derivative












1












$begingroup$


Let $Omega:=[x_a,x_b]times[t_a,t_b]subset mathbb{R}^2$ and consider the functional $D:C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that
$$D[y]= iint_{Omega}d(x,t,y) , dx , dt$$
where
$$d(x,t,y)= (1+y(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} dfrac{dy(z,t)}{dt},dz$$
where $pinmathbb{N}$.



Is such a functional Fréchet-differentiable at any point $y_0 in C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)$? And how do we calculate its derivative?



In particular, I am not sure how the derivative in the integrand should be dealt with. When applying the limit definition, should I consider something like
$$D[y_0+eta]= iint_Omegaleft[(1+y_0(x,t)+eta(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} left(dfrac{dy_0(z,t)}{dt}+dfrac{deta(z,t)}{dt}right)dzright], dx,dt quad?$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 16:55








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    Jan 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 22:42
















1












$begingroup$


Let $Omega:=[x_a,x_b]times[t_a,t_b]subset mathbb{R}^2$ and consider the functional $D:C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that
$$D[y]= iint_{Omega}d(x,t,y) , dx , dt$$
where
$$d(x,t,y)= (1+y(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} dfrac{dy(z,t)}{dt},dz$$
where $pinmathbb{N}$.



Is such a functional Fréchet-differentiable at any point $y_0 in C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)$? And how do we calculate its derivative?



In particular, I am not sure how the derivative in the integrand should be dealt with. When applying the limit definition, should I consider something like
$$D[y_0+eta]= iint_Omegaleft[(1+y_0(x,t)+eta(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} left(dfrac{dy_0(z,t)}{dt}+dfrac{deta(z,t)}{dt}right)dzright], dx,dt quad?$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 16:55








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    Jan 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 22:42














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $Omega:=[x_a,x_b]times[t_a,t_b]subset mathbb{R}^2$ and consider the functional $D:C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that
$$D[y]= iint_{Omega}d(x,t,y) , dx , dt$$
where
$$d(x,t,y)= (1+y(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} dfrac{dy(z,t)}{dt},dz$$
where $pinmathbb{N}$.



Is such a functional Fréchet-differentiable at any point $y_0 in C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)$? And how do we calculate its derivative?



In particular, I am not sure how the derivative in the integrand should be dealt with. When applying the limit definition, should I consider something like
$$D[y_0+eta]= iint_Omegaleft[(1+y_0(x,t)+eta(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} left(dfrac{dy_0(z,t)}{dt}+dfrac{deta(z,t)}{dt}right)dzright], dx,dt quad?$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $Omega:=[x_a,x_b]times[t_a,t_b]subset mathbb{R}^2$ and consider the functional $D:C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that
$$D[y]= iint_{Omega}d(x,t,y) , dx , dt$$
where
$$d(x,t,y)= (1+y(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} dfrac{dy(z,t)}{dt},dz$$
where $pinmathbb{N}$.



Is such a functional Fréchet-differentiable at any point $y_0 in C^2left(Omega,mathbb{R}right)$? And how do we calculate its derivative?



In particular, I am not sure how the derivative in the integrand should be dealt with. When applying the limit definition, should I consider something like
$$D[y_0+eta]= iint_Omegaleft[(1+y_0(x,t)+eta(x,t))^pint_{x_a}^{x} left(dfrac{dy_0(z,t)}{dt}+dfrac{deta(z,t)}{dt}right)dzright], dx,dt quad?$$







integration functional-analysis frechet-derivative






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 21 at 18:15







William Tomblin

















asked Jan 21 at 16:37









William TomblinWilliam Tomblin

256111




256111












  • $begingroup$
    If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 16:55








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    Jan 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 22:42


















  • $begingroup$
    If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 16:55








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    Jan 21 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 17:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 21 at 22:42
















$begingroup$
If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Jan 21 at 16:40




$begingroup$
If $y$ were of class $mathscr{C}^2,$ the standard product rules and differentiation under integral sign would apply. For a case like this, I believe you need to do the limit definition.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Jan 21 at 16:40












$begingroup$
@WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– William Tomblin
Jan 21 at 16:55






$begingroup$
@WillM. I tried to edit my question, making my point a bit clearer. I actually thought that $y$ being in $C^1$ or $C^2$ didn't make any difference, am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– William Tomblin
Jan 21 at 16:55






1




1




$begingroup$
Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
$endgroup$
– lalala
Jan 21 at 17:00




$begingroup$
Isnt the integeral just y(b)-y(a)?
$endgroup$
– lalala
Jan 21 at 17:00




1




1




$begingroup$
Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 21 at 17:49




$begingroup$
Isn’t $(1+y)^p$ a function, and not a scalar?
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 21 at 17:49




1




1




$begingroup$
Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 21 at 22:42




$begingroup$
Then yes, your expression for $D[y_0+eta]$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 21 at 22:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

All your notation seems wrong. So I am fixing it.



Let us consider the space $mathrm{X} = mathscr{B}^1_{mathbf{R}}(mathrm{U} times mathrm{I})$ of differentiable real valued bounded function with continuity defined on the product of the open set $mathrm{U}$ of $mathbf{R}^d$ and the compact interval $mathrm{I} = [a, b]$ of $mathbf{R}.$ Endow $mathrm{X}$ with the structure of complete normed space by setting $|f|_mathrm{X} = |f| + left| mathbf{D} f right|$ (the sup-norm and the operator norm). (The fact that $mathrm{X}$ is complete follows from the mean value theorem.)



Define $varphi:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y} = mathscr{C}^b_mathbf{R}(mathrm{U}),$ the right hand side is the space of continuous and bounded functions with the sup norm, by
$$varphi(f) = u_f, quad u_f(x) = (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt.$$



Now,
$$begin{align*}
u_{f + h}(x) &= (1 + f(x)+ h(x))^p intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= big[(1 + f(x))^p + p(1 + f(x))^{p-1} h(x) + o(1+f(x); h(x))big]\
&times intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= u_f(x)+p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt \
&+ o(1+f(x); h(x))intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt, \\
end{align*}$$

where $o(a; s)$ is a sum of powers of $s^alpha,$ where $alpha$ runs from 2 until p, and the coefficients are powers of $a$ as well. Because $f$ is bounded, there exists a constant $c = c(f)$ such that $$|o(1 + f; h)| leq c(|h|^2+ldots+|h|^p) = o(|h|).$$
It is easy to check that the function $L_f:h mapsto L_f(h)$ given according to the rule
$$xmapsto p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt$$
belongs to $mathrm{Y}$ (that is, $L_f:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y}$) and it is linear. The desired derivative of $varphi$ is therefore $mathbf{D}varphi(f) = L_f.$ Q.E.D.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 18:20











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082075%2ffr%25c3%25a9chet-derivative-of-functionals-which-depend-on-the-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

All your notation seems wrong. So I am fixing it.



Let us consider the space $mathrm{X} = mathscr{B}^1_{mathbf{R}}(mathrm{U} times mathrm{I})$ of differentiable real valued bounded function with continuity defined on the product of the open set $mathrm{U}$ of $mathbf{R}^d$ and the compact interval $mathrm{I} = [a, b]$ of $mathbf{R}.$ Endow $mathrm{X}$ with the structure of complete normed space by setting $|f|_mathrm{X} = |f| + left| mathbf{D} f right|$ (the sup-norm and the operator norm). (The fact that $mathrm{X}$ is complete follows from the mean value theorem.)



Define $varphi:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y} = mathscr{C}^b_mathbf{R}(mathrm{U}),$ the right hand side is the space of continuous and bounded functions with the sup norm, by
$$varphi(f) = u_f, quad u_f(x) = (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt.$$



Now,
$$begin{align*}
u_{f + h}(x) &= (1 + f(x)+ h(x))^p intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= big[(1 + f(x))^p + p(1 + f(x))^{p-1} h(x) + o(1+f(x); h(x))big]\
&times intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= u_f(x)+p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt \
&+ o(1+f(x); h(x))intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt, \\
end{align*}$$

where $o(a; s)$ is a sum of powers of $s^alpha,$ where $alpha$ runs from 2 until p, and the coefficients are powers of $a$ as well. Because $f$ is bounded, there exists a constant $c = c(f)$ such that $$|o(1 + f; h)| leq c(|h|^2+ldots+|h|^p) = o(|h|).$$
It is easy to check that the function $L_f:h mapsto L_f(h)$ given according to the rule
$$xmapsto p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt$$
belongs to $mathrm{Y}$ (that is, $L_f:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y}$) and it is linear. The desired derivative of $varphi$ is therefore $mathbf{D}varphi(f) = L_f.$ Q.E.D.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 18:20
















1












$begingroup$

All your notation seems wrong. So I am fixing it.



Let us consider the space $mathrm{X} = mathscr{B}^1_{mathbf{R}}(mathrm{U} times mathrm{I})$ of differentiable real valued bounded function with continuity defined on the product of the open set $mathrm{U}$ of $mathbf{R}^d$ and the compact interval $mathrm{I} = [a, b]$ of $mathbf{R}.$ Endow $mathrm{X}$ with the structure of complete normed space by setting $|f|_mathrm{X} = |f| + left| mathbf{D} f right|$ (the sup-norm and the operator norm). (The fact that $mathrm{X}$ is complete follows from the mean value theorem.)



Define $varphi:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y} = mathscr{C}^b_mathbf{R}(mathrm{U}),$ the right hand side is the space of continuous and bounded functions with the sup norm, by
$$varphi(f) = u_f, quad u_f(x) = (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt.$$



Now,
$$begin{align*}
u_{f + h}(x) &= (1 + f(x)+ h(x))^p intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= big[(1 + f(x))^p + p(1 + f(x))^{p-1} h(x) + o(1+f(x); h(x))big]\
&times intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= u_f(x)+p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt \
&+ o(1+f(x); h(x))intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt, \\
end{align*}$$

where $o(a; s)$ is a sum of powers of $s^alpha,$ where $alpha$ runs from 2 until p, and the coefficients are powers of $a$ as well. Because $f$ is bounded, there exists a constant $c = c(f)$ such that $$|o(1 + f; h)| leq c(|h|^2+ldots+|h|^p) = o(|h|).$$
It is easy to check that the function $L_f:h mapsto L_f(h)$ given according to the rule
$$xmapsto p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt$$
belongs to $mathrm{Y}$ (that is, $L_f:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y}$) and it is linear. The desired derivative of $varphi$ is therefore $mathbf{D}varphi(f) = L_f.$ Q.E.D.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 18:20














1












1








1





$begingroup$

All your notation seems wrong. So I am fixing it.



Let us consider the space $mathrm{X} = mathscr{B}^1_{mathbf{R}}(mathrm{U} times mathrm{I})$ of differentiable real valued bounded function with continuity defined on the product of the open set $mathrm{U}$ of $mathbf{R}^d$ and the compact interval $mathrm{I} = [a, b]$ of $mathbf{R}.$ Endow $mathrm{X}$ with the structure of complete normed space by setting $|f|_mathrm{X} = |f| + left| mathbf{D} f right|$ (the sup-norm and the operator norm). (The fact that $mathrm{X}$ is complete follows from the mean value theorem.)



Define $varphi:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y} = mathscr{C}^b_mathbf{R}(mathrm{U}),$ the right hand side is the space of continuous and bounded functions with the sup norm, by
$$varphi(f) = u_f, quad u_f(x) = (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt.$$



Now,
$$begin{align*}
u_{f + h}(x) &= (1 + f(x)+ h(x))^p intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= big[(1 + f(x))^p + p(1 + f(x))^{p-1} h(x) + o(1+f(x); h(x))big]\
&times intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= u_f(x)+p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt \
&+ o(1+f(x); h(x))intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt, \\
end{align*}$$

where $o(a; s)$ is a sum of powers of $s^alpha,$ where $alpha$ runs from 2 until p, and the coefficients are powers of $a$ as well. Because $f$ is bounded, there exists a constant $c = c(f)$ such that $$|o(1 + f; h)| leq c(|h|^2+ldots+|h|^p) = o(|h|).$$
It is easy to check that the function $L_f:h mapsto L_f(h)$ given according to the rule
$$xmapsto p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt$$
belongs to $mathrm{Y}$ (that is, $L_f:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y}$) and it is linear. The desired derivative of $varphi$ is therefore $mathbf{D}varphi(f) = L_f.$ Q.E.D.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



All your notation seems wrong. So I am fixing it.



Let us consider the space $mathrm{X} = mathscr{B}^1_{mathbf{R}}(mathrm{U} times mathrm{I})$ of differentiable real valued bounded function with continuity defined on the product of the open set $mathrm{U}$ of $mathbf{R}^d$ and the compact interval $mathrm{I} = [a, b]$ of $mathbf{R}.$ Endow $mathrm{X}$ with the structure of complete normed space by setting $|f|_mathrm{X} = |f| + left| mathbf{D} f right|$ (the sup-norm and the operator norm). (The fact that $mathrm{X}$ is complete follows from the mean value theorem.)



Define $varphi:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y} = mathscr{C}^b_mathbf{R}(mathrm{U}),$ the right hand side is the space of continuous and bounded functions with the sup norm, by
$$varphi(f) = u_f, quad u_f(x) = (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt.$$



Now,
$$begin{align*}
u_{f + h}(x) &= (1 + f(x)+ h(x))^p intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= big[(1 + f(x))^p + p(1 + f(x))^{p-1} h(x) + o(1+f(x); h(x))big]\
&times intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt \
&= u_f(x)+p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt \
&+ o(1+f(x); h(x))intlimits_a^b (mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) + mathbf{D}_2h(x, t)) dt, \\
end{align*}$$

where $o(a; s)$ is a sum of powers of $s^alpha,$ where $alpha$ runs from 2 until p, and the coefficients are powers of $a$ as well. Because $f$ is bounded, there exists a constant $c = c(f)$ such that $$|o(1 + f; h)| leq c(|h|^2+ldots+|h|^p) = o(|h|).$$
It is easy to check that the function $L_f:h mapsto L_f(h)$ given according to the rule
$$xmapsto p(1+f(x))^{p-1} h(x)intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2f(x, t) dt + (1 + f(x))^p intlimits_a^b mathbf{D}_2h(x, t) dt$$
belongs to $mathrm{Y}$ (that is, $L_f:mathrm{X} to mathrm{Y}$) and it is linear. The desired derivative of $varphi$ is therefore $mathbf{D}varphi(f) = L_f.$ Q.E.D.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 21 at 17:38









Will M.Will M.

2,835315




2,835315












  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 18:20


















  • $begingroup$
    Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
    $endgroup$
    – William Tomblin
    Jan 21 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Jan 21 at 18:20
















$begingroup$
Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
$endgroup$
– William Tomblin
Jan 21 at 18:13




$begingroup$
Indeed, my notation was completely wrong, sorry! However you are now definitely solving another problem...
$endgroup$
– William Tomblin
Jan 21 at 18:13












$begingroup$
My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Jan 21 at 18:20




$begingroup$
My problem contains yours, I believe. And I made a mistake too, instead of $(x)$ it should be $(x, t).$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Jan 21 at 18:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082075%2ffr%25c3%25a9chet-derivative-of-functionals-which-depend-on-the-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith