Classifying linear first-order PDE system (elliptic, hyperbolic, or parabolic)












1












$begingroup$




  1. Consider the constants
    $$begin{aligned}
    & (text i.); a_1 = b_1 = a_2 = b_2 = 1 \
    & (text {ii}.); a_1 = b_2 = 1, quad b_1 = 0, quad a_2 = -1 \
    & (text {iii}.); a_1 = b_1 = b_2 = 1, quad a_2 = -1
    end{aligned} tag{3}$$
    classify the following system for the constants given above
    $$begin{aligned}
    & a_1 u_x + a_2 v_y = g_1 \
    & b_1 v_x + b_2 u_y = g_2
    end{aligned} tag{4}$$
    where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are +ive constants.




I have already put the system in the form
$$
Aq_x + Bq_y = C,
$$
with
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
a_1 & 0\
0 &b_1
end{bmatrix},quad B=
begin{bmatrix}
0 & a_2\
b_2 & 0
end{bmatrix},quad q=
begin{pmatrix}
u\
v
end{pmatrix}.
$$
But then, I do not know how to continue from here on to find out the eigenvalues due to the term
$$
C =
begin{pmatrix}
g_1\
g_2
end{pmatrix}
$$
that is confusing me.
If $C$ were $0$, then I'd know how to proceed, but unfortunately this is not the case.



Any help would be appreciated.






pde linear-pde







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$




    1. Consider the constants
      $$begin{aligned}
      & (text i.); a_1 = b_1 = a_2 = b_2 = 1 \
      & (text {ii}.); a_1 = b_2 = 1, quad b_1 = 0, quad a_2 = -1 \
      & (text {iii}.); a_1 = b_1 = b_2 = 1, quad a_2 = -1
      end{aligned} tag{3}$$
      classify the following system for the constants given above
      $$begin{aligned}
      & a_1 u_x + a_2 v_y = g_1 \
      & b_1 v_x + b_2 u_y = g_2
      end{aligned} tag{4}$$
      where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are +ive constants.




    I have already put the system in the form
    $$
    Aq_x + Bq_y = C,
    $$
    with
    $$
    A =
    begin{bmatrix}
    a_1 & 0\
    0 &b_1
    end{bmatrix},quad B=
    begin{bmatrix}
    0 & a_2\
    b_2 & 0
    end{bmatrix},quad q=
    begin{pmatrix}
    u\
    v
    end{pmatrix}.
    $$
    But then, I do not know how to continue from here on to find out the eigenvalues due to the term
    $$
    C =
    begin{pmatrix}
    g_1\
    g_2
    end{pmatrix}
    $$
    that is confusing me.
    If $C$ were $0$, then I'd know how to proceed, but unfortunately this is not the case.



    Any help would be appreciated.






    pde linear-pde







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$




      1. Consider the constants
        $$begin{aligned}
        & (text i.); a_1 = b_1 = a_2 = b_2 = 1 \
        & (text {ii}.); a_1 = b_2 = 1, quad b_1 = 0, quad a_2 = -1 \
        & (text {iii}.); a_1 = b_1 = b_2 = 1, quad a_2 = -1
        end{aligned} tag{3}$$
        classify the following system for the constants given above
        $$begin{aligned}
        & a_1 u_x + a_2 v_y = g_1 \
        & b_1 v_x + b_2 u_y = g_2
        end{aligned} tag{4}$$
        where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are +ive constants.




      I have already put the system in the form
      $$
      Aq_x + Bq_y = C,
      $$
      with
      $$
      A =
      begin{bmatrix}
      a_1 & 0\
      0 &b_1
      end{bmatrix},quad B=
      begin{bmatrix}
      0 & a_2\
      b_2 & 0
      end{bmatrix},quad q=
      begin{pmatrix}
      u\
      v
      end{pmatrix}.
      $$
      But then, I do not know how to continue from here on to find out the eigenvalues due to the term
      $$
      C =
      begin{pmatrix}
      g_1\
      g_2
      end{pmatrix}
      $$
      that is confusing me.
      If $C$ were $0$, then I'd know how to proceed, but unfortunately this is not the case.



      Any help would be appreciated.






      pde linear-pde







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$






      1. Consider the constants
        $$begin{aligned}
        & (text i.); a_1 = b_1 = a_2 = b_2 = 1 \
        & (text {ii}.); a_1 = b_2 = 1, quad b_1 = 0, quad a_2 = -1 \
        & (text {iii}.); a_1 = b_1 = b_2 = 1, quad a_2 = -1
        end{aligned} tag{3}$$
        classify the following system for the constants given above
        $$begin{aligned}
        & a_1 u_x + a_2 v_y = g_1 \
        & b_1 v_x + b_2 u_y = g_2
        end{aligned} tag{4}$$
        where $g_1$ and $g_2$ are +ive constants.




      I have already put the system in the form
      $$
      Aq_x + Bq_y = C,
      $$
      with
      $$
      A =
      begin{bmatrix}
      a_1 & 0\
      0 &b_1
      end{bmatrix},quad B=
      begin{bmatrix}
      0 & a_2\
      b_2 & 0
      end{bmatrix},quad q=
      begin{pmatrix}
      u\
      v
      end{pmatrix}.
      $$
      But then, I do not know how to continue from here on to find out the eigenvalues due to the term
      $$
      C =
      begin{pmatrix}
      g_1\
      g_2
      end{pmatrix}
      $$
      that is confusing me.
      If $C$ were $0$, then I'd know how to proceed, but unfortunately this is not the case.



      Any help would be appreciated.






      pde linear-pde




      pde linear-pde






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 22 at 15:08









      Harry49

      7,50431341




      7,50431341










      asked Jan 21 at 21:03









      Matias SalgoMatias Salgo

      113




      113






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let us differentiate the first equation w.r.t. $y$ and the second one w.r.t. $x$:
          begin{aligned}
          a_1 u_{xy} + a_2 v_{yy} &= 0 \
          b_1 v_{xx} + b_2 u_{yx} &= 0
          end{aligned}
          Using the equality of mixed derivatives for $u$ and the fact that $a_1 = b_2 = 1 neq 0$, we obtain the equations
          $$
          u_{xy} = u_{yx} = -a_2/a_1 v_{yy} = -b_1/b_2 v_{xx}
          $$
          Since $a_2neq 0$, we are left with the second-order linear PDE $A v_{xx} + 2 B v_{xy} + Cv_{yy} = 0$ satisfied by $v$, with $A = frac{a_1 b_1}{a_2 b_2}$, $B = 0$ and $C = -1$.




          • The case (i) is hyperbolic since $B^2 - A C > 0$.

          • The case (ii) is parabolic since $B^2 - A C = 0$.

          • The case (iii) is elliptic since $B^2 - A C < 0$.


          An alternative derivation would consist in the diagonalization of the matrices
          $$
          mathcal A = begin{bmatrix}
          a_1 & 0 \
          0 & b_1
          end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad mathcal B = begin{bmatrix}
          0 & a_2 \
          b_2 & 0
          end{bmatrix}
          $$
          as $mathcal A = P D_{mathcal A} P^{-1}$ and $mathcal B = P D_{mathcal B} P^{-1}$, where $D_{mathcal A}$, $D_{mathcal B}$ are diagonal matrices.
          For instance, (i) leads to
          $$
          P = begin{bmatrix}
          -1 & 1 \
          1 & 1
          end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad P^{-1} = begin{bmatrix}
          -1/2 & 1/2 \
          1/2 & 1/2
          end{bmatrix}
          $$
          so that
          $D_{mathcal A} = text{diag}(1,1)$ and $D_{mathcal B} = text{diag}(-1,1)$.
          Hence, the first-order system $mathcal A q_x + mathcal B q_y = g$ with $q = (u,v)^top$ and $g = (g_1, g_2)^top$ rewrites as $p_x + D_{mathcal B} p_y = f$ with $p = P^{-1} q$ and $f = P^{-1} g$. Since $D_{mathcal B}$ has real eigenvalues, this system is a first-order hyperbolic system.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082412%2fclassifying-linear-first-order-pde-system-elliptic-hyperbolic-or-parabolic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Let us differentiate the first equation w.r.t. $y$ and the second one w.r.t. $x$:
            begin{aligned}
            a_1 u_{xy} + a_2 v_{yy} &= 0 \
            b_1 v_{xx} + b_2 u_{yx} &= 0
            end{aligned}
            Using the equality of mixed derivatives for $u$ and the fact that $a_1 = b_2 = 1 neq 0$, we obtain the equations
            $$
            u_{xy} = u_{yx} = -a_2/a_1 v_{yy} = -b_1/b_2 v_{xx}
            $$
            Since $a_2neq 0$, we are left with the second-order linear PDE $A v_{xx} + 2 B v_{xy} + Cv_{yy} = 0$ satisfied by $v$, with $A = frac{a_1 b_1}{a_2 b_2}$, $B = 0$ and $C = -1$.




            • The case (i) is hyperbolic since $B^2 - A C > 0$.

            • The case (ii) is parabolic since $B^2 - A C = 0$.

            • The case (iii) is elliptic since $B^2 - A C < 0$.


            An alternative derivation would consist in the diagonalization of the matrices
            $$
            mathcal A = begin{bmatrix}
            a_1 & 0 \
            0 & b_1
            end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad mathcal B = begin{bmatrix}
            0 & a_2 \
            b_2 & 0
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            as $mathcal A = P D_{mathcal A} P^{-1}$ and $mathcal B = P D_{mathcal B} P^{-1}$, where $D_{mathcal A}$, $D_{mathcal B}$ are diagonal matrices.
            For instance, (i) leads to
            $$
            P = begin{bmatrix}
            -1 & 1 \
            1 & 1
            end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad P^{-1} = begin{bmatrix}
            -1/2 & 1/2 \
            1/2 & 1/2
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            so that
            $D_{mathcal A} = text{diag}(1,1)$ and $D_{mathcal B} = text{diag}(-1,1)$.
            Hence, the first-order system $mathcal A q_x + mathcal B q_y = g$ with $q = (u,v)^top$ and $g = (g_1, g_2)^top$ rewrites as $p_x + D_{mathcal B} p_y = f$ with $p = P^{-1} q$ and $f = P^{-1} g$. Since $D_{mathcal B}$ has real eigenvalues, this system is a first-order hyperbolic system.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let us differentiate the first equation w.r.t. $y$ and the second one w.r.t. $x$:
              begin{aligned}
              a_1 u_{xy} + a_2 v_{yy} &= 0 \
              b_1 v_{xx} + b_2 u_{yx} &= 0
              end{aligned}
              Using the equality of mixed derivatives for $u$ and the fact that $a_1 = b_2 = 1 neq 0$, we obtain the equations
              $$
              u_{xy} = u_{yx} = -a_2/a_1 v_{yy} = -b_1/b_2 v_{xx}
              $$
              Since $a_2neq 0$, we are left with the second-order linear PDE $A v_{xx} + 2 B v_{xy} + Cv_{yy} = 0$ satisfied by $v$, with $A = frac{a_1 b_1}{a_2 b_2}$, $B = 0$ and $C = -1$.




              • The case (i) is hyperbolic since $B^2 - A C > 0$.

              • The case (ii) is parabolic since $B^2 - A C = 0$.

              • The case (iii) is elliptic since $B^2 - A C < 0$.


              An alternative derivation would consist in the diagonalization of the matrices
              $$
              mathcal A = begin{bmatrix}
              a_1 & 0 \
              0 & b_1
              end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad mathcal B = begin{bmatrix}
              0 & a_2 \
              b_2 & 0
              end{bmatrix}
              $$
              as $mathcal A = P D_{mathcal A} P^{-1}$ and $mathcal B = P D_{mathcal B} P^{-1}$, where $D_{mathcal A}$, $D_{mathcal B}$ are diagonal matrices.
              For instance, (i) leads to
              $$
              P = begin{bmatrix}
              -1 & 1 \
              1 & 1
              end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad P^{-1} = begin{bmatrix}
              -1/2 & 1/2 \
              1/2 & 1/2
              end{bmatrix}
              $$
              so that
              $D_{mathcal A} = text{diag}(1,1)$ and $D_{mathcal B} = text{diag}(-1,1)$.
              Hence, the first-order system $mathcal A q_x + mathcal B q_y = g$ with $q = (u,v)^top$ and $g = (g_1, g_2)^top$ rewrites as $p_x + D_{mathcal B} p_y = f$ with $p = P^{-1} q$ and $f = P^{-1} g$. Since $D_{mathcal B}$ has real eigenvalues, this system is a first-order hyperbolic system.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Let us differentiate the first equation w.r.t. $y$ and the second one w.r.t. $x$:
                begin{aligned}
                a_1 u_{xy} + a_2 v_{yy} &= 0 \
                b_1 v_{xx} + b_2 u_{yx} &= 0
                end{aligned}
                Using the equality of mixed derivatives for $u$ and the fact that $a_1 = b_2 = 1 neq 0$, we obtain the equations
                $$
                u_{xy} = u_{yx} = -a_2/a_1 v_{yy} = -b_1/b_2 v_{xx}
                $$
                Since $a_2neq 0$, we are left with the second-order linear PDE $A v_{xx} + 2 B v_{xy} + Cv_{yy} = 0$ satisfied by $v$, with $A = frac{a_1 b_1}{a_2 b_2}$, $B = 0$ and $C = -1$.




                • The case (i) is hyperbolic since $B^2 - A C > 0$.

                • The case (ii) is parabolic since $B^2 - A C = 0$.

                • The case (iii) is elliptic since $B^2 - A C < 0$.


                An alternative derivation would consist in the diagonalization of the matrices
                $$
                mathcal A = begin{bmatrix}
                a_1 & 0 \
                0 & b_1
                end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad mathcal B = begin{bmatrix}
                0 & a_2 \
                b_2 & 0
                end{bmatrix}
                $$
                as $mathcal A = P D_{mathcal A} P^{-1}$ and $mathcal B = P D_{mathcal B} P^{-1}$, where $D_{mathcal A}$, $D_{mathcal B}$ are diagonal matrices.
                For instance, (i) leads to
                $$
                P = begin{bmatrix}
                -1 & 1 \
                1 & 1
                end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad P^{-1} = begin{bmatrix}
                -1/2 & 1/2 \
                1/2 & 1/2
                end{bmatrix}
                $$
                so that
                $D_{mathcal A} = text{diag}(1,1)$ and $D_{mathcal B} = text{diag}(-1,1)$.
                Hence, the first-order system $mathcal A q_x + mathcal B q_y = g$ with $q = (u,v)^top$ and $g = (g_1, g_2)^top$ rewrites as $p_x + D_{mathcal B} p_y = f$ with $p = P^{-1} q$ and $f = P^{-1} g$. Since $D_{mathcal B}$ has real eigenvalues, this system is a first-order hyperbolic system.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Let us differentiate the first equation w.r.t. $y$ and the second one w.r.t. $x$:
                begin{aligned}
                a_1 u_{xy} + a_2 v_{yy} &= 0 \
                b_1 v_{xx} + b_2 u_{yx} &= 0
                end{aligned}
                Using the equality of mixed derivatives for $u$ and the fact that $a_1 = b_2 = 1 neq 0$, we obtain the equations
                $$
                u_{xy} = u_{yx} = -a_2/a_1 v_{yy} = -b_1/b_2 v_{xx}
                $$
                Since $a_2neq 0$, we are left with the second-order linear PDE $A v_{xx} + 2 B v_{xy} + Cv_{yy} = 0$ satisfied by $v$, with $A = frac{a_1 b_1}{a_2 b_2}$, $B = 0$ and $C = -1$.




                • The case (i) is hyperbolic since $B^2 - A C > 0$.

                • The case (ii) is parabolic since $B^2 - A C = 0$.

                • The case (iii) is elliptic since $B^2 - A C < 0$.


                An alternative derivation would consist in the diagonalization of the matrices
                $$
                mathcal A = begin{bmatrix}
                a_1 & 0 \
                0 & b_1
                end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad mathcal B = begin{bmatrix}
                0 & a_2 \
                b_2 & 0
                end{bmatrix}
                $$
                as $mathcal A = P D_{mathcal A} P^{-1}$ and $mathcal B = P D_{mathcal B} P^{-1}$, where $D_{mathcal A}$, $D_{mathcal B}$ are diagonal matrices.
                For instance, (i) leads to
                $$
                P = begin{bmatrix}
                -1 & 1 \
                1 & 1
                end{bmatrix} qquadtext{and}qquad P^{-1} = begin{bmatrix}
                -1/2 & 1/2 \
                1/2 & 1/2
                end{bmatrix}
                $$
                so that
                $D_{mathcal A} = text{diag}(1,1)$ and $D_{mathcal B} = text{diag}(-1,1)$.
                Hence, the first-order system $mathcal A q_x + mathcal B q_y = g$ with $q = (u,v)^top$ and $g = (g_1, g_2)^top$ rewrites as $p_x + D_{mathcal B} p_y = f$ with $p = P^{-1} q$ and $f = P^{-1} g$. Since $D_{mathcal B}$ has real eigenvalues, this system is a first-order hyperbolic system.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 22 at 16:43

























                answered Jan 22 at 14:42









                Harry49Harry49

                7,50431341




                7,50431341






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082412%2fclassifying-linear-first-order-pde-system-elliptic-hyperbolic-or-parabolic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    Image
                    0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule ...
                    Read more

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    Image
                    .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d ...
                    Read more

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]

                    Image
                    up vote 0 down vote favorite This question already has an answer here: Image source URI requiring authorization 3 answers Add header to all* HTTP requests on a machine 1 answer first of all sorry for my english. Recently I added some security in the backend of my project, and now I need to send a validation code(apiKey) inside the headers to retrieve the images. I have a problem with ALL images in my project that I had attached in my UI. For example, before I had: <Image Height="90" Source="{Binding Video.Thumbnail}"/> Now I need to change my code to create a CUSTOM petition add the apiKey in the header:...
                    Read more