How to find the equation of the conic before applying the rotation?
$begingroup$
Given the rotation matrix:
$$Q=begin{bmatrix}frac{2}{sqrt{5}}& frac{1}{sqrt{5}}\-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}& frac{2}{sqrt{5}}end{bmatrix},$$ I want to find the equation of the conic $C$ given by $$x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0,$$ which I know is a parabola, before applying the rotation to it.
I was thinking about solving the system of equation $$begin{cases}x=frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}\ y=-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}end{cases},$$ and then substituting $x$ and $y$ in the initial equation of the conic. The result should be $$5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}=0,$$ but it seems that my results are different.
linear-algebra matrices conic-sections rotations
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Given the rotation matrix:
$$Q=begin{bmatrix}frac{2}{sqrt{5}}& frac{1}{sqrt{5}}\-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}& frac{2}{sqrt{5}}end{bmatrix},$$ I want to find the equation of the conic $C$ given by $$x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0,$$ which I know is a parabola, before applying the rotation to it.
I was thinking about solving the system of equation $$begin{cases}x=frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}\ y=-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}end{cases},$$ and then substituting $x$ and $y$ in the initial equation of the conic. The result should be $$5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}=0,$$ but it seems that my results are different.
linear-algebra matrices conic-sections rotations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Given the rotation matrix:
$$Q=begin{bmatrix}frac{2}{sqrt{5}}& frac{1}{sqrt{5}}\-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}& frac{2}{sqrt{5}}end{bmatrix},$$ I want to find the equation of the conic $C$ given by $$x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0,$$ which I know is a parabola, before applying the rotation to it.
I was thinking about solving the system of equation $$begin{cases}x=frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}\ y=-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}end{cases},$$ and then substituting $x$ and $y$ in the initial equation of the conic. The result should be $$5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}=0,$$ but it seems that my results are different.
linear-algebra matrices conic-sections rotations
$endgroup$
Given the rotation matrix:
$$Q=begin{bmatrix}frac{2}{sqrt{5}}& frac{1}{sqrt{5}}\-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}& frac{2}{sqrt{5}}end{bmatrix},$$ I want to find the equation of the conic $C$ given by $$x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0,$$ which I know is a parabola, before applying the rotation to it.
I was thinking about solving the system of equation $$begin{cases}x=frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}\ y=-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}end{cases},$$ and then substituting $x$ and $y$ in the initial equation of the conic. The result should be $$5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}=0,$$ but it seems that my results are different.
linear-algebra matrices conic-sections rotations
linear-algebra matrices conic-sections rotations
edited Jan 21 at 22:00
jordan_glen
1
1
asked Jan 21 at 20:28


KevinKevin
16211
16211
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is entirely correct; plugging in your substitutions into the first equation for $C$ yields the result you claim it should be:
begin{eqnarray*}
x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x&=&
left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2+4left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
& &+4left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2-10sqrt{5}left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
&=&frac{1}{5}(4tilde{x}^2+4tilde{x}tilde{y}+tilde{y}^2)+frac{4}{5}(-2tilde{x}^2+3tilde{x}tilde{y}+2tilde{y}^2)\
& &+frac{4}{5}(tilde{x}^2-4tilde{x}tilde{y}+4tilde{y}^2)-10(2tilde{x}+tilde{y})\
&=&5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}.
end{eqnarray*}
You seem to have made a mistake in your calculation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basically, it looks like you’re getting the transformation backwards. If you have a coordinate transformation $mathbf x'=Qmathbf x$, to get the transformed equation you have to substitute for $mathbf x$ in the original equation, i.e., apply the inverse transformation to $x$ and $y$ in the equation. So, if the original coordinate transformation was given by $Q$, you now want to transform by $Q^{-1}$, which means that you substitute $Q(x,y)^T$ for $(x,y)$ in the equation that you have.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have a conic with the equation $P(x,y) = 0.$
Next, you apply the rotation $Q$ to the conic,
so if $(tilde x,tilde y)$ is a point on the conic before rotation,
it is taken to the point
$$
(x,y)=left(tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{y},-tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{y}right) tag1
$$
after rotation.
Moreover, after applying the rotation, the rotated conic has the equation
$$ x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0. tag2$$
If you now use Equation $(1)$ to provide the values of $x$ and $y$
in terms of $tilde x$ and $tilde y,$
you can make those substitutions for $x$ and $y$ in Equation $(2),$
and then you have an equation that must be satisfied by any point
$(tilde x,tilde y)$ on the original conic.
Try it.
The fact that one of your steps was to "solve" Equation $(1)$ suggests that your substitution was actually for a rotation by the correct angular magnitude, but in the opposite direction from what you needed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082369%2fhow-to-find-the-equation-of-the-conic-before-applying-the-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your approach is entirely correct; plugging in your substitutions into the first equation for $C$ yields the result you claim it should be:
begin{eqnarray*}
x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x&=&
left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2+4left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
& &+4left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2-10sqrt{5}left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
&=&frac{1}{5}(4tilde{x}^2+4tilde{x}tilde{y}+tilde{y}^2)+frac{4}{5}(-2tilde{x}^2+3tilde{x}tilde{y}+2tilde{y}^2)\
& &+frac{4}{5}(tilde{x}^2-4tilde{x}tilde{y}+4tilde{y}^2)-10(2tilde{x}+tilde{y})\
&=&5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}.
end{eqnarray*}
You seem to have made a mistake in your calculation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is entirely correct; plugging in your substitutions into the first equation for $C$ yields the result you claim it should be:
begin{eqnarray*}
x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x&=&
left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2+4left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
& &+4left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2-10sqrt{5}left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
&=&frac{1}{5}(4tilde{x}^2+4tilde{x}tilde{y}+tilde{y}^2)+frac{4}{5}(-2tilde{x}^2+3tilde{x}tilde{y}+2tilde{y}^2)\
& &+frac{4}{5}(tilde{x}^2-4tilde{x}tilde{y}+4tilde{y}^2)-10(2tilde{x}+tilde{y})\
&=&5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}.
end{eqnarray*}
You seem to have made a mistake in your calculation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your approach is entirely correct; plugging in your substitutions into the first equation for $C$ yields the result you claim it should be:
begin{eqnarray*}
x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x&=&
left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2+4left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
& &+4left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2-10sqrt{5}left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
&=&frac{1}{5}(4tilde{x}^2+4tilde{x}tilde{y}+tilde{y}^2)+frac{4}{5}(-2tilde{x}^2+3tilde{x}tilde{y}+2tilde{y}^2)\
& &+frac{4}{5}(tilde{x}^2-4tilde{x}tilde{y}+4tilde{y}^2)-10(2tilde{x}+tilde{y})\
&=&5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}.
end{eqnarray*}
You seem to have made a mistake in your calculation.
$endgroup$
Your approach is entirely correct; plugging in your substitutions into the first equation for $C$ yields the result you claim it should be:
begin{eqnarray*}
x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x&=&
left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2+4left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
& &+4left(-frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)^2-10sqrt{5}left(frac{2}{sqrt{5}}tilde{x}+frac{1}{sqrt{5}}tilde{y}right)\
&=&frac{1}{5}(4tilde{x}^2+4tilde{x}tilde{y}+tilde{y}^2)+frac{4}{5}(-2tilde{x}^2+3tilde{x}tilde{y}+2tilde{y}^2)\
& &+frac{4}{5}(tilde{x}^2-4tilde{x}tilde{y}+4tilde{y}^2)-10(2tilde{x}+tilde{y})\
&=&5tilde{y}^2-20tilde{x}-10tilde{y}.
end{eqnarray*}
You seem to have made a mistake in your calculation.
edited Jan 21 at 21:01
answered Jan 21 at 20:50


ServaesServaes
27.5k34098
27.5k34098
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basically, it looks like you’re getting the transformation backwards. If you have a coordinate transformation $mathbf x'=Qmathbf x$, to get the transformed equation you have to substitute for $mathbf x$ in the original equation, i.e., apply the inverse transformation to $x$ and $y$ in the equation. So, if the original coordinate transformation was given by $Q$, you now want to transform by $Q^{-1}$, which means that you substitute $Q(x,y)^T$ for $(x,y)$ in the equation that you have.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basically, it looks like you’re getting the transformation backwards. If you have a coordinate transformation $mathbf x'=Qmathbf x$, to get the transformed equation you have to substitute for $mathbf x$ in the original equation, i.e., apply the inverse transformation to $x$ and $y$ in the equation. So, if the original coordinate transformation was given by $Q$, you now want to transform by $Q^{-1}$, which means that you substitute $Q(x,y)^T$ for $(x,y)$ in the equation that you have.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Basically, it looks like you’re getting the transformation backwards. If you have a coordinate transformation $mathbf x'=Qmathbf x$, to get the transformed equation you have to substitute for $mathbf x$ in the original equation, i.e., apply the inverse transformation to $x$ and $y$ in the equation. So, if the original coordinate transformation was given by $Q$, you now want to transform by $Q^{-1}$, which means that you substitute $Q(x,y)^T$ for $(x,y)$ in the equation that you have.
$endgroup$
Basically, it looks like you’re getting the transformation backwards. If you have a coordinate transformation $mathbf x'=Qmathbf x$, to get the transformed equation you have to substitute for $mathbf x$ in the original equation, i.e., apply the inverse transformation to $x$ and $y$ in the equation. So, if the original coordinate transformation was given by $Q$, you now want to transform by $Q^{-1}$, which means that you substitute $Q(x,y)^T$ for $(x,y)$ in the equation that you have.
answered Jan 21 at 21:00
amdamd
30.8k21051
30.8k21051
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have a conic with the equation $P(x,y) = 0.$
Next, you apply the rotation $Q$ to the conic,
so if $(tilde x,tilde y)$ is a point on the conic before rotation,
it is taken to the point
$$
(x,y)=left(tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{y},-tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{y}right) tag1
$$
after rotation.
Moreover, after applying the rotation, the rotated conic has the equation
$$ x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0. tag2$$
If you now use Equation $(1)$ to provide the values of $x$ and $y$
in terms of $tilde x$ and $tilde y,$
you can make those substitutions for $x$ and $y$ in Equation $(2),$
and then you have an equation that must be satisfied by any point
$(tilde x,tilde y)$ on the original conic.
Try it.
The fact that one of your steps was to "solve" Equation $(1)$ suggests that your substitution was actually for a rotation by the correct angular magnitude, but in the opposite direction from what you needed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have a conic with the equation $P(x,y) = 0.$
Next, you apply the rotation $Q$ to the conic,
so if $(tilde x,tilde y)$ is a point on the conic before rotation,
it is taken to the point
$$
(x,y)=left(tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{y},-tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{y}right) tag1
$$
after rotation.
Moreover, after applying the rotation, the rotated conic has the equation
$$ x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0. tag2$$
If you now use Equation $(1)$ to provide the values of $x$ and $y$
in terms of $tilde x$ and $tilde y,$
you can make those substitutions for $x$ and $y$ in Equation $(2),$
and then you have an equation that must be satisfied by any point
$(tilde x,tilde y)$ on the original conic.
Try it.
The fact that one of your steps was to "solve" Equation $(1)$ suggests that your substitution was actually for a rotation by the correct angular magnitude, but in the opposite direction from what you needed.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we have a conic with the equation $P(x,y) = 0.$
Next, you apply the rotation $Q$ to the conic,
so if $(tilde x,tilde y)$ is a point on the conic before rotation,
it is taken to the point
$$
(x,y)=left(tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{y},-tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{y}right) tag1
$$
after rotation.
Moreover, after applying the rotation, the rotated conic has the equation
$$ x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0. tag2$$
If you now use Equation $(1)$ to provide the values of $x$ and $y$
in terms of $tilde x$ and $tilde y,$
you can make those substitutions for $x$ and $y$ in Equation $(2),$
and then you have an equation that must be satisfied by any point
$(tilde x,tilde y)$ on the original conic.
Try it.
The fact that one of your steps was to "solve" Equation $(1)$ suggests that your substitution was actually for a rotation by the correct angular magnitude, but in the opposite direction from what you needed.
$endgroup$
Suppose we have a conic with the equation $P(x,y) = 0.$
Next, you apply the rotation $Q$ to the conic,
so if $(tilde x,tilde y)$ is a point on the conic before rotation,
it is taken to the point
$$
(x,y)=left(tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{y},-tfrac{1}{sqrt5}tilde{x}+tfrac{2}{sqrt5}tilde{y}right) tag1
$$
after rotation.
Moreover, after applying the rotation, the rotated conic has the equation
$$ x^2+4xy+4y^2-10sqrt{5}x=0. tag2$$
If you now use Equation $(1)$ to provide the values of $x$ and $y$
in terms of $tilde x$ and $tilde y,$
you can make those substitutions for $x$ and $y$ in Equation $(2),$
and then you have an equation that must be satisfied by any point
$(tilde x,tilde y)$ on the original conic.
Try it.
The fact that one of your steps was to "solve" Equation $(1)$ suggests that your substitution was actually for a rotation by the correct angular magnitude, but in the opposite direction from what you needed.
answered Jan 21 at 21:16
David KDavid K
54.9k344120
54.9k344120
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082369%2fhow-to-find-the-equation-of-the-conic-before-applying-the-rotation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You mean you want to find the equation after applying the rotation? Before applying it, you have the equation that you wrote down, or am I misunderstanding?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 21 at 20:48
1
$begingroup$
I'm not sure but you may be applying the inverse rotation.
$endgroup$
– Harnak
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Another way, substantially equivalent but slighty easier in calculations, is to consider $(x,y)^tA(x,y)+Bcdot(x,y)$, and then applying $(tilde{x},tilde{y})=Q(x,y)$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@Servaes No, the equation of the conic has been rotated by the rotation matrix. Now, I want to find the equation of the conic before the rotation.
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 21 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@amd $-10sqrt{5}x$
$endgroup$
– gabriele cassese
Jan 21 at 20:51