Do the octonions contain infinitely many copies of the quaternions?












7












$begingroup$


Note: by "infinitely many", I'm confident I always mean $beth_1$ many herein.



We can easily show the quaternions contain infinitely many copies of $Bbb C$ because, given any unit vector $inBbb R^3$ of components $b,,c,,d$, $Bbb R[h]$ is isomorphic to $Bbb C$ with $h:=bi+cj+dk$. Sure, these aren't "independent" copies of $Bbb C$ in the same way $Bbb R[i],,Bbb R[j],,Bbb R[k]$ are. But it's still of interest because, for example, a family of tensor products over matrices using different copies of $Bbb C$ provide an easy definition of a determinant, even though general matrices of quaternions prohibit this. For example, if $A_1,,cdots,,A_n$ are matrices and $O$ denotes a contextually appropriate zero matrix, the block matrix $$left(begin{array}{cccc}
A_{1} & O & cdots & O\
O & A_{2} & cdots & O\
vdots & vdots & ddots & O\
O & O & cdots & A_{n}
end{array}right)$$
can be said to have determinant $prod_ldet A_l$. The order is important, but one in particular is natural.



I may be overlooking some details of the above benefit to arbitrarily many copies of $Bbb C$ in $Bbb H$, wherein a very rich commuting family of matrices is constructed, but my question isn't about that. I'm wondering how we'd prove there are infinitely many copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$. (Again, block matrices provide a benefit, in this case inheriting the associativity of the $A_l$.) I suspect a proof exists that admits the following sketch:




  • In $Bbb O$, create some $h_1,,h_2$ each analogous to $iinBbb C$, generating an associative algebra and satisfying $h_1h_2=-h_2h_1$;

  • Note that any such pair of square roots of $-1$ can model the quaternions viz. $i=h_1,,j=h_2,,k=h_1h_2$;

  • Show the above can be done in infinitely many different ways.


Of course there are infinitely many ways to choose the pair $(h_1,,h_2)$, but $Bbb R[h_1,,h_2]$ won't always be a different set for such pairs. That's why I suspect the proof requires a few clever i-dotting t-crosses.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:29
















7












$begingroup$


Note: by "infinitely many", I'm confident I always mean $beth_1$ many herein.



We can easily show the quaternions contain infinitely many copies of $Bbb C$ because, given any unit vector $inBbb R^3$ of components $b,,c,,d$, $Bbb R[h]$ is isomorphic to $Bbb C$ with $h:=bi+cj+dk$. Sure, these aren't "independent" copies of $Bbb C$ in the same way $Bbb R[i],,Bbb R[j],,Bbb R[k]$ are. But it's still of interest because, for example, a family of tensor products over matrices using different copies of $Bbb C$ provide an easy definition of a determinant, even though general matrices of quaternions prohibit this. For example, if $A_1,,cdots,,A_n$ are matrices and $O$ denotes a contextually appropriate zero matrix, the block matrix $$left(begin{array}{cccc}
A_{1} & O & cdots & O\
O & A_{2} & cdots & O\
vdots & vdots & ddots & O\
O & O & cdots & A_{n}
end{array}right)$$
can be said to have determinant $prod_ldet A_l$. The order is important, but one in particular is natural.



I may be overlooking some details of the above benefit to arbitrarily many copies of $Bbb C$ in $Bbb H$, wherein a very rich commuting family of matrices is constructed, but my question isn't about that. I'm wondering how we'd prove there are infinitely many copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$. (Again, block matrices provide a benefit, in this case inheriting the associativity of the $A_l$.) I suspect a proof exists that admits the following sketch:




  • In $Bbb O$, create some $h_1,,h_2$ each analogous to $iinBbb C$, generating an associative algebra and satisfying $h_1h_2=-h_2h_1$;

  • Note that any such pair of square roots of $-1$ can model the quaternions viz. $i=h_1,,j=h_2,,k=h_1h_2$;

  • Show the above can be done in infinitely many different ways.


Of course there are infinitely many ways to choose the pair $(h_1,,h_2)$, but $Bbb R[h_1,,h_2]$ won't always be a different set for such pairs. That's why I suspect the proof requires a few clever i-dotting t-crosses.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:29














7












7








7





$begingroup$


Note: by "infinitely many", I'm confident I always mean $beth_1$ many herein.



We can easily show the quaternions contain infinitely many copies of $Bbb C$ because, given any unit vector $inBbb R^3$ of components $b,,c,,d$, $Bbb R[h]$ is isomorphic to $Bbb C$ with $h:=bi+cj+dk$. Sure, these aren't "independent" copies of $Bbb C$ in the same way $Bbb R[i],,Bbb R[j],,Bbb R[k]$ are. But it's still of interest because, for example, a family of tensor products over matrices using different copies of $Bbb C$ provide an easy definition of a determinant, even though general matrices of quaternions prohibit this. For example, if $A_1,,cdots,,A_n$ are matrices and $O$ denotes a contextually appropriate zero matrix, the block matrix $$left(begin{array}{cccc}
A_{1} & O & cdots & O\
O & A_{2} & cdots & O\
vdots & vdots & ddots & O\
O & O & cdots & A_{n}
end{array}right)$$
can be said to have determinant $prod_ldet A_l$. The order is important, but one in particular is natural.



I may be overlooking some details of the above benefit to arbitrarily many copies of $Bbb C$ in $Bbb H$, wherein a very rich commuting family of matrices is constructed, but my question isn't about that. I'm wondering how we'd prove there are infinitely many copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$. (Again, block matrices provide a benefit, in this case inheriting the associativity of the $A_l$.) I suspect a proof exists that admits the following sketch:




  • In $Bbb O$, create some $h_1,,h_2$ each analogous to $iinBbb C$, generating an associative algebra and satisfying $h_1h_2=-h_2h_1$;

  • Note that any such pair of square roots of $-1$ can model the quaternions viz. $i=h_1,,j=h_2,,k=h_1h_2$;

  • Show the above can be done in infinitely many different ways.


Of course there are infinitely many ways to choose the pair $(h_1,,h_2)$, but $Bbb R[h_1,,h_2]$ won't always be a different set for such pairs. That's why I suspect the proof requires a few clever i-dotting t-crosses.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Note: by "infinitely many", I'm confident I always mean $beth_1$ many herein.



We can easily show the quaternions contain infinitely many copies of $Bbb C$ because, given any unit vector $inBbb R^3$ of components $b,,c,,d$, $Bbb R[h]$ is isomorphic to $Bbb C$ with $h:=bi+cj+dk$. Sure, these aren't "independent" copies of $Bbb C$ in the same way $Bbb R[i],,Bbb R[j],,Bbb R[k]$ are. But it's still of interest because, for example, a family of tensor products over matrices using different copies of $Bbb C$ provide an easy definition of a determinant, even though general matrices of quaternions prohibit this. For example, if $A_1,,cdots,,A_n$ are matrices and $O$ denotes a contextually appropriate zero matrix, the block matrix $$left(begin{array}{cccc}
A_{1} & O & cdots & O\
O & A_{2} & cdots & O\
vdots & vdots & ddots & O\
O & O & cdots & A_{n}
end{array}right)$$
can be said to have determinant $prod_ldet A_l$. The order is important, but one in particular is natural.



I may be overlooking some details of the above benefit to arbitrarily many copies of $Bbb C$ in $Bbb H$, wherein a very rich commuting family of matrices is constructed, but my question isn't about that. I'm wondering how we'd prove there are infinitely many copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$. (Again, block matrices provide a benefit, in this case inheriting the associativity of the $A_l$.) I suspect a proof exists that admits the following sketch:




  • In $Bbb O$, create some $h_1,,h_2$ each analogous to $iinBbb C$, generating an associative algebra and satisfying $h_1h_2=-h_2h_1$;

  • Note that any such pair of square roots of $-1$ can model the quaternions viz. $i=h_1,,j=h_2,,k=h_1h_2$;

  • Show the above can be done in infinitely many different ways.


Of course there are infinitely many ways to choose the pair $(h_1,,h_2)$, but $Bbb R[h_1,,h_2]$ won't always be a different set for such pairs. That's why I suspect the proof requires a few clever i-dotting t-crosses.







group-isomorphism quaternions octonions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 21:40







J.G.

















asked Feb 1 at 21:23









J.G.J.G.

33.2k23252




33.2k23252












  • $begingroup$
    In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:29


















  • $begingroup$
    In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:29
















$begingroup$
In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Feb 2 at 5:29




$begingroup$
In fact, we can identify the space of copies of $Bbb H$ in $Bbb O$ with the compact Riemannian symmetric space of type $G$, namely, $G_2 / SO(4)$; in particular this space has dimension $8$.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Feb 2 at 5:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Yes. One can show the following 2 things:




  1. Any octonion $x$ not in $mathbb R$ generates a subalgebra $A$ isomorphic to $mathbb C$.


  2. For any octonion $y$, the subalgebra generated $B$ by $x$ and $y$ is associative.



This should be covered in treatments of composition algebra, e.g. it is probably in Springer-Veldkamp.



Hence if we take $y$ outside of $A$ in 1, by Frobenius' classification of $mathbb R$-division algebras, $B$ must be isomorphic to $mathbb H$ (a priori it may not be obvious $B$ is division, but you can get this a posteriori from Frobenius' theorem as adjoining inverses to $B$, which necessarily lie in $mathbb O$, still gives you an associative algebra), and thus the 4-dimensional space spanned by $1, x, y, xy$. Since no finite collection of $mathbb R^4$ subspaces of $mathbb R^8$ cover $mathbb R^8$, you get infinitely many copies of $mathbb H$.



To say that you get (at least) the cardinality of the continuum copies of $mathbb H$, it suffices to show




  1. For any nonreal octonion $z$, there is a subalgebra $B simeq mathbb H$ as above not containing $z$.


To see this, take $x$ as above not in $mathbb R z$. Then $x$ and $z$ generate a space $B' simeq mathbb H$. Simply take $y not in B'$. Then the algebra $B$ generated by $x$ and $y$ cannot contain $B'$ since $B ne B'$ but $dim B = dim B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Mar 19 at 22:55












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096742%2fdo-the-octonions-contain-infinitely-many-copies-of-the-quaternions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

Yes. One can show the following 2 things:




  1. Any octonion $x$ not in $mathbb R$ generates a subalgebra $A$ isomorphic to $mathbb C$.


  2. For any octonion $y$, the subalgebra generated $B$ by $x$ and $y$ is associative.



This should be covered in treatments of composition algebra, e.g. it is probably in Springer-Veldkamp.



Hence if we take $y$ outside of $A$ in 1, by Frobenius' classification of $mathbb R$-division algebras, $B$ must be isomorphic to $mathbb H$ (a priori it may not be obvious $B$ is division, but you can get this a posteriori from Frobenius' theorem as adjoining inverses to $B$, which necessarily lie in $mathbb O$, still gives you an associative algebra), and thus the 4-dimensional space spanned by $1, x, y, xy$. Since no finite collection of $mathbb R^4$ subspaces of $mathbb R^8$ cover $mathbb R^8$, you get infinitely many copies of $mathbb H$.



To say that you get (at least) the cardinality of the continuum copies of $mathbb H$, it suffices to show




  1. For any nonreal octonion $z$, there is a subalgebra $B simeq mathbb H$ as above not containing $z$.


To see this, take $x$ as above not in $mathbb R z$. Then $x$ and $z$ generate a space $B' simeq mathbb H$. Simply take $y not in B'$. Then the algebra $B$ generated by $x$ and $y$ cannot contain $B'$ since $B ne B'$ but $dim B = dim B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Mar 19 at 22:55
















7












$begingroup$

Yes. One can show the following 2 things:




  1. Any octonion $x$ not in $mathbb R$ generates a subalgebra $A$ isomorphic to $mathbb C$.


  2. For any octonion $y$, the subalgebra generated $B$ by $x$ and $y$ is associative.



This should be covered in treatments of composition algebra, e.g. it is probably in Springer-Veldkamp.



Hence if we take $y$ outside of $A$ in 1, by Frobenius' classification of $mathbb R$-division algebras, $B$ must be isomorphic to $mathbb H$ (a priori it may not be obvious $B$ is division, but you can get this a posteriori from Frobenius' theorem as adjoining inverses to $B$, which necessarily lie in $mathbb O$, still gives you an associative algebra), and thus the 4-dimensional space spanned by $1, x, y, xy$. Since no finite collection of $mathbb R^4$ subspaces of $mathbb R^8$ cover $mathbb R^8$, you get infinitely many copies of $mathbb H$.



To say that you get (at least) the cardinality of the continuum copies of $mathbb H$, it suffices to show




  1. For any nonreal octonion $z$, there is a subalgebra $B simeq mathbb H$ as above not containing $z$.


To see this, take $x$ as above not in $mathbb R z$. Then $x$ and $z$ generate a space $B' simeq mathbb H$. Simply take $y not in B'$. Then the algebra $B$ generated by $x$ and $y$ cannot contain $B'$ since $B ne B'$ but $dim B = dim B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Mar 19 at 22:55














7












7








7





$begingroup$

Yes. One can show the following 2 things:




  1. Any octonion $x$ not in $mathbb R$ generates a subalgebra $A$ isomorphic to $mathbb C$.


  2. For any octonion $y$, the subalgebra generated $B$ by $x$ and $y$ is associative.



This should be covered in treatments of composition algebra, e.g. it is probably in Springer-Veldkamp.



Hence if we take $y$ outside of $A$ in 1, by Frobenius' classification of $mathbb R$-division algebras, $B$ must be isomorphic to $mathbb H$ (a priori it may not be obvious $B$ is division, but you can get this a posteriori from Frobenius' theorem as adjoining inverses to $B$, which necessarily lie in $mathbb O$, still gives you an associative algebra), and thus the 4-dimensional space spanned by $1, x, y, xy$. Since no finite collection of $mathbb R^4$ subspaces of $mathbb R^8$ cover $mathbb R^8$, you get infinitely many copies of $mathbb H$.



To say that you get (at least) the cardinality of the continuum copies of $mathbb H$, it suffices to show




  1. For any nonreal octonion $z$, there is a subalgebra $B simeq mathbb H$ as above not containing $z$.


To see this, take $x$ as above not in $mathbb R z$. Then $x$ and $z$ generate a space $B' simeq mathbb H$. Simply take $y not in B'$. Then the algebra $B$ generated by $x$ and $y$ cannot contain $B'$ since $B ne B'$ but $dim B = dim B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Yes. One can show the following 2 things:




  1. Any octonion $x$ not in $mathbb R$ generates a subalgebra $A$ isomorphic to $mathbb C$.


  2. For any octonion $y$, the subalgebra generated $B$ by $x$ and $y$ is associative.



This should be covered in treatments of composition algebra, e.g. it is probably in Springer-Veldkamp.



Hence if we take $y$ outside of $A$ in 1, by Frobenius' classification of $mathbb R$-division algebras, $B$ must be isomorphic to $mathbb H$ (a priori it may not be obvious $B$ is division, but you can get this a posteriori from Frobenius' theorem as adjoining inverses to $B$, which necessarily lie in $mathbb O$, still gives you an associative algebra), and thus the 4-dimensional space spanned by $1, x, y, xy$. Since no finite collection of $mathbb R^4$ subspaces of $mathbb R^8$ cover $mathbb R^8$, you get infinitely many copies of $mathbb H$.



To say that you get (at least) the cardinality of the continuum copies of $mathbb H$, it suffices to show




  1. For any nonreal octonion $z$, there is a subalgebra $B simeq mathbb H$ as above not containing $z$.


To see this, take $x$ as above not in $mathbb R z$. Then $x$ and $z$ generate a space $B' simeq mathbb H$. Simply take $y not in B'$. Then the algebra $B$ generated by $x$ and $y$ cannot contain $B'$ since $B ne B'$ but $dim B = dim B'$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 2 at 5:20

























answered Feb 2 at 3:14









KimballKimball

2,0451029




2,0451029








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Mar 19 at 22:55














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
    $endgroup$
    – Travis
    Feb 2 at 5:30










  • $begingroup$
    I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
    $endgroup$
    – Vincent
    Mar 19 at 22:55








1




1




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Feb 2 at 5:30




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, property (2) is called alternativity.
$endgroup$
– Travis
Feb 2 at 5:30












$begingroup$
I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
$endgroup$
– Vincent
Mar 19 at 22:55




$begingroup$
I upvoted first and only later noticed this messes up your perfectly round reputation of 2000. I'm sorry
$endgroup$
– Vincent
Mar 19 at 22:55


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3096742%2fdo-the-octonions-contain-infinitely-many-copies-of-the-quaternions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith