Dominant contribution of v = 0 → v = 1 transition in vibrational spectroscopy












9












$begingroup$


Recently I had studied vibrational spectroscopy using the quantum harmonic oscillator model.



After stating the gross selection rule [that vibrational oscillation demands a change in dipole moment for polar molecule] and showing that transitions are possible only between adjacent energy states ($Delta v = pm 1$), my professor's notes state that:




Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states, following Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the dominant contribution to IR absorption spectra comes from $v = 0 to v = 1$ transition and is called fundamental transition.




I do not understand the point that 'Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states...'. What does it mean and how does it lead to the conclusion that most of the times a transition of $v = 0 to v = 1$ will take place?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Feb 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    @orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
    $endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Mar 6 at 20:00


















9












$begingroup$


Recently I had studied vibrational spectroscopy using the quantum harmonic oscillator model.



After stating the gross selection rule [that vibrational oscillation demands a change in dipole moment for polar molecule] and showing that transitions are possible only between adjacent energy states ($Delta v = pm 1$), my professor's notes state that:




Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states, following Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the dominant contribution to IR absorption spectra comes from $v = 0 to v = 1$ transition and is called fundamental transition.




I do not understand the point that 'Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states...'. What does it mean and how does it lead to the conclusion that most of the times a transition of $v = 0 to v = 1$ will take place?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Feb 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    @orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
    $endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Mar 6 at 20:00
















9












9








9





$begingroup$


Recently I had studied vibrational spectroscopy using the quantum harmonic oscillator model.



After stating the gross selection rule [that vibrational oscillation demands a change in dipole moment for polar molecule] and showing that transitions are possible only between adjacent energy states ($Delta v = pm 1$), my professor's notes state that:




Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states, following Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the dominant contribution to IR absorption spectra comes from $v = 0 to v = 1$ transition and is called fundamental transition.




I do not understand the point that 'Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states...'. What does it mean and how does it lead to the conclusion that most of the times a transition of $v = 0 to v = 1$ will take place?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Recently I had studied vibrational spectroscopy using the quantum harmonic oscillator model.



After stating the gross selection rule [that vibrational oscillation demands a change in dipole moment for polar molecule] and showing that transitions are possible only between adjacent energy states ($Delta v = pm 1$), my professor's notes state that:




Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states, following Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, the dominant contribution to IR absorption spectra comes from $v = 0 to v = 1$ transition and is called fundamental transition.




I do not understand the point that 'Most of the molecules will populate the lowest energy states...'. What does it mean and how does it lead to the conclusion that most of the times a transition of $v = 0 to v = 1$ will take place?







physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry ir-spectroscopy






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 3 at 21:26









orthocresol

40.3k7117247




40.3k7117247










asked Feb 2 at 20:32









Onkar SinghOnkar Singh

514




514








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Feb 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    @orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
    $endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Mar 6 at 20:00
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Feb 3 at 21:23












  • $begingroup$
    @orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
    $endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Mar 6 at 20:00










2




2




$begingroup$
A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
$endgroup$
– orthocresol
Feb 3 at 21:23






$begingroup$
A tangential note: the vibrational quantum number is commonly denoted with the English letter $v$, not the Greek $nu$ (nu). The Greek letter $nu$ is used to refer to a frequency; so we can have a transition for which $Delta E = hnu$, for example.
$endgroup$
– orthocresol
Feb 3 at 21:23














$begingroup$
@orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
Mar 6 at 20:00






$begingroup$
@orthocresol, did you mean wavelength? In $Delta E=hnu$ , $nu$ is a frequency in 1/second.
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
Mar 6 at 20:00












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The reference should really be to the Boltzmann distribution where the population is proportional to $exp(-E_n/(k_mathrm BT))$ where $E_n$ is the energy of the $n^{th}$ energy level. This shows that the population is greatest when $n$ is small. Also you need to know that absorption is proportional to the population difference between any two levels. As the vibrational frequency is generally a few hundred wavenumbers, or higher, and $k_mathrm BT$ at room temperature $approx 210$ wavenumbers you can see that the population of $n= 0$ levels can be very large compared to that when $ngt 0$.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "431"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108931%2fdominant-contribution-of-v-0-%25e2%2586%2592-v-1-transition-in-vibrational-spectroscopy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10












    $begingroup$

    The reference should really be to the Boltzmann distribution where the population is proportional to $exp(-E_n/(k_mathrm BT))$ where $E_n$ is the energy of the $n^{th}$ energy level. This shows that the population is greatest when $n$ is small. Also you need to know that absorption is proportional to the population difference between any two levels. As the vibrational frequency is generally a few hundred wavenumbers, or higher, and $k_mathrm BT$ at room temperature $approx 210$ wavenumbers you can see that the population of $n= 0$ levels can be very large compared to that when $ngt 0$.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      10












      $begingroup$

      The reference should really be to the Boltzmann distribution where the population is proportional to $exp(-E_n/(k_mathrm BT))$ where $E_n$ is the energy of the $n^{th}$ energy level. This shows that the population is greatest when $n$ is small. Also you need to know that absorption is proportional to the population difference between any two levels. As the vibrational frequency is generally a few hundred wavenumbers, or higher, and $k_mathrm BT$ at room temperature $approx 210$ wavenumbers you can see that the population of $n= 0$ levels can be very large compared to that when $ngt 0$.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        The reference should really be to the Boltzmann distribution where the population is proportional to $exp(-E_n/(k_mathrm BT))$ where $E_n$ is the energy of the $n^{th}$ energy level. This shows that the population is greatest when $n$ is small. Also you need to know that absorption is proportional to the population difference between any two levels. As the vibrational frequency is generally a few hundred wavenumbers, or higher, and $k_mathrm BT$ at room temperature $approx 210$ wavenumbers you can see that the population of $n= 0$ levels can be very large compared to that when $ngt 0$.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The reference should really be to the Boltzmann distribution where the population is proportional to $exp(-E_n/(k_mathrm BT))$ where $E_n$ is the energy of the $n^{th}$ energy level. This shows that the population is greatest when $n$ is small. Also you need to know that absorption is proportional to the population difference between any two levels. As the vibrational frequency is generally a few hundred wavenumbers, or higher, and $k_mathrm BT$ at room temperature $approx 210$ wavenumbers you can see that the population of $n= 0$ levels can be very large compared to that when $ngt 0$.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Feb 3 at 10:12









        Loong

        34.3k884179




        34.3k884179










        answered Feb 2 at 21:50









        porphyrinporphyrin

        18.4k3157




        18.4k3157






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108931%2fdominant-contribution-of-v-0-%25e2%2586%2592-v-1-transition-in-vibrational-spectroscopy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith