Is this a correct way to think of a subspace?












1












$begingroup$


A subspace in $R^n$ is just a set with conditions that create a hyperplane (so a line, a plane, etc.) in $R^n$?
And of course it has to pass the subspace test.



But if what I said is correct, because a subspace has to contain the zero vector, so that the scalar multiplication test passes, does the line or plane HAVE to cross the origin? What's the difference between a line passing through the origin and one that is just shifted one unit up so it doesn't touch to origin? What makes the first a subspace and the second not?



If any of my questions were hard to follow I think it's because I have a poor understanding of what a subspace is so any help on that would be nice. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:35










  • $begingroup$
    Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
    $endgroup$
    – Theo C.
    Feb 2 at 23:35












  • $begingroup$
    What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:37
















1












$begingroup$


A subspace in $R^n$ is just a set with conditions that create a hyperplane (so a line, a plane, etc.) in $R^n$?
And of course it has to pass the subspace test.



But if what I said is correct, because a subspace has to contain the zero vector, so that the scalar multiplication test passes, does the line or plane HAVE to cross the origin? What's the difference between a line passing through the origin and one that is just shifted one unit up so it doesn't touch to origin? What makes the first a subspace and the second not?



If any of my questions were hard to follow I think it's because I have a poor understanding of what a subspace is so any help on that would be nice. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:35










  • $begingroup$
    Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
    $endgroup$
    – Theo C.
    Feb 2 at 23:35












  • $begingroup$
    What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:37














1












1








1





$begingroup$


A subspace in $R^n$ is just a set with conditions that create a hyperplane (so a line, a plane, etc.) in $R^n$?
And of course it has to pass the subspace test.



But if what I said is correct, because a subspace has to contain the zero vector, so that the scalar multiplication test passes, does the line or plane HAVE to cross the origin? What's the difference between a line passing through the origin and one that is just shifted one unit up so it doesn't touch to origin? What makes the first a subspace and the second not?



If any of my questions were hard to follow I think it's because I have a poor understanding of what a subspace is so any help on that would be nice. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




A subspace in $R^n$ is just a set with conditions that create a hyperplane (so a line, a plane, etc.) in $R^n$?
And of course it has to pass the subspace test.



But if what I said is correct, because a subspace has to contain the zero vector, so that the scalar multiplication test passes, does the line or plane HAVE to cross the origin? What's the difference between a line passing through the origin and one that is just shifted one unit up so it doesn't touch to origin? What makes the first a subspace and the second not?



If any of my questions were hard to follow I think it's because I have a poor understanding of what a subspace is so any help on that would be nice. Thanks!







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 2 at 23:32









mingming

4606




4606












  • $begingroup$
    In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:35










  • $begingroup$
    Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
    $endgroup$
    – Theo C.
    Feb 2 at 23:35












  • $begingroup$
    What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:37


















  • $begingroup$
    In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:35










  • $begingroup$
    Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
    $endgroup$
    – Theo C.
    Feb 2 at 23:35












  • $begingroup$
    What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Feb 2 at 23:37
















$begingroup$
In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Feb 2 at 23:35




$begingroup$
In general, a hyperplane is defined as a maximal proper subspace, and this in a finite dimensional space as $;Bbb R^n;$ means any subspace of dimension $;n-1;$ . There are many, many other subspace that are not hyperplanes if for example the dimension is$;3,4,...etc.;$
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Feb 2 at 23:35












$begingroup$
Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
$endgroup$
– Theo C.
Feb 2 at 23:35






$begingroup$
Go read about "affine spaces". They are essentially vector spaces but with the stipulation of having a zero vector removed. Revelant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/884666/…
$endgroup$
– Theo C.
Feb 2 at 23:35














$begingroup$
What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Feb 2 at 23:37




$begingroup$
What makes a line through the origin a subspace, contrary to what happens with a line not passing through the origin, is that in the first case the sum of two vectors on the line in again on the line, and the same happens when you multiply any vector on the line by any scalar...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Feb 2 at 23:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

To define a subspace let us first define a vector space. A vector space (over $mathbb R$) is a set $V$, such that for any elements $v,win V$ and $a,binmathbb R$, we have that $av+bwin V$. I.e. I can multiply a vector by a number and get another vector in my space, and I can add arbitrary vectors together and get a vector in my space. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space for the full list of definitions).



Now, a subspace of a vector space is a subset of $V$, $W$, such that $W$ is a vector space. So, as you said a line through the origin is a subspace, but a line that does not pass through the origin is not a vector space. This is because it does not contain 0. Since we can multiply vectors by arbitrary numbers in $mathbb R$, we can multiply any vector by zero. So every vector space must contain 0.



Now, if we have a finite dimensional vector space $V=mathbb R^n$ and a subspace $W$ of dimension $m$, then one can show (using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram–Schmidt_process) that there will be an orthonormal basis $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_n$ of $V$ such that $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m$ is a basis for $W$. Then the $ntimes n$ matrix
$$
P=(mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m,mathbf 0,dots,mathbf 0),
$$

gives $m$ linear equations that define $W$. Namely
$$
W={xin V|Px=x}.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097942%2fis-this-a-correct-way-to-think-of-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    To define a subspace let us first define a vector space. A vector space (over $mathbb R$) is a set $V$, such that for any elements $v,win V$ and $a,binmathbb R$, we have that $av+bwin V$. I.e. I can multiply a vector by a number and get another vector in my space, and I can add arbitrary vectors together and get a vector in my space. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space for the full list of definitions).



    Now, a subspace of a vector space is a subset of $V$, $W$, such that $W$ is a vector space. So, as you said a line through the origin is a subspace, but a line that does not pass through the origin is not a vector space. This is because it does not contain 0. Since we can multiply vectors by arbitrary numbers in $mathbb R$, we can multiply any vector by zero. So every vector space must contain 0.



    Now, if we have a finite dimensional vector space $V=mathbb R^n$ and a subspace $W$ of dimension $m$, then one can show (using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram–Schmidt_process) that there will be an orthonormal basis $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_n$ of $V$ such that $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m$ is a basis for $W$. Then the $ntimes n$ matrix
    $$
    P=(mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m,mathbf 0,dots,mathbf 0),
    $$

    gives $m$ linear equations that define $W$. Namely
    $$
    W={xin V|Px=x}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      To define a subspace let us first define a vector space. A vector space (over $mathbb R$) is a set $V$, such that for any elements $v,win V$ and $a,binmathbb R$, we have that $av+bwin V$. I.e. I can multiply a vector by a number and get another vector in my space, and I can add arbitrary vectors together and get a vector in my space. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space for the full list of definitions).



      Now, a subspace of a vector space is a subset of $V$, $W$, such that $W$ is a vector space. So, as you said a line through the origin is a subspace, but a line that does not pass through the origin is not a vector space. This is because it does not contain 0. Since we can multiply vectors by arbitrary numbers in $mathbb R$, we can multiply any vector by zero. So every vector space must contain 0.



      Now, if we have a finite dimensional vector space $V=mathbb R^n$ and a subspace $W$ of dimension $m$, then one can show (using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram–Schmidt_process) that there will be an orthonormal basis $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_n$ of $V$ such that $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m$ is a basis for $W$. Then the $ntimes n$ matrix
      $$
      P=(mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m,mathbf 0,dots,mathbf 0),
      $$

      gives $m$ linear equations that define $W$. Namely
      $$
      W={xin V|Px=x}.
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        To define a subspace let us first define a vector space. A vector space (over $mathbb R$) is a set $V$, such that for any elements $v,win V$ and $a,binmathbb R$, we have that $av+bwin V$. I.e. I can multiply a vector by a number and get another vector in my space, and I can add arbitrary vectors together and get a vector in my space. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space for the full list of definitions).



        Now, a subspace of a vector space is a subset of $V$, $W$, such that $W$ is a vector space. So, as you said a line through the origin is a subspace, but a line that does not pass through the origin is not a vector space. This is because it does not contain 0. Since we can multiply vectors by arbitrary numbers in $mathbb R$, we can multiply any vector by zero. So every vector space must contain 0.



        Now, if we have a finite dimensional vector space $V=mathbb R^n$ and a subspace $W$ of dimension $m$, then one can show (using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram–Schmidt_process) that there will be an orthonormal basis $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_n$ of $V$ such that $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m$ is a basis for $W$. Then the $ntimes n$ matrix
        $$
        P=(mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m,mathbf 0,dots,mathbf 0),
        $$

        gives $m$ linear equations that define $W$. Namely
        $$
        W={xin V|Px=x}.
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        To define a subspace let us first define a vector space. A vector space (over $mathbb R$) is a set $V$, such that for any elements $v,win V$ and $a,binmathbb R$, we have that $av+bwin V$. I.e. I can multiply a vector by a number and get another vector in my space, and I can add arbitrary vectors together and get a vector in my space. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space for the full list of definitions).



        Now, a subspace of a vector space is a subset of $V$, $W$, such that $W$ is a vector space. So, as you said a line through the origin is a subspace, but a line that does not pass through the origin is not a vector space. This is because it does not contain 0. Since we can multiply vectors by arbitrary numbers in $mathbb R$, we can multiply any vector by zero. So every vector space must contain 0.



        Now, if we have a finite dimensional vector space $V=mathbb R^n$ and a subspace $W$ of dimension $m$, then one can show (using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gram–Schmidt_process) that there will be an orthonormal basis $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_n$ of $V$ such that $mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m$ is a basis for $W$. Then the $ntimes n$ matrix
        $$
        P=(mathbf e_1,dots,mathbf e_m,mathbf 0,dots,mathbf 0),
        $$

        gives $m$ linear equations that define $W$. Namely
        $$
        W={xin V|Px=x}.
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 2 at 23:42









        Alec B-GAlec B-G

        52019




        52019






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097942%2fis-this-a-correct-way-to-think-of-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$