Is $mathbb{A}^3 - {0}$ a separated variety?












1












$begingroup$


To check if $X=mathbb{A}^n -{0}$ is separated is equivalent to check that the diagonal is closed. In this case I think that: $X times X= {(x,y)| x,y in X }$ then $Delta(X)=Z(y-x)- {0}subset mathbb{A}^n $ but i'm not sure if this is closed or not. I think that it is open can you confirm that?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    To check if $X=mathbb{A}^n -{0}$ is separated is equivalent to check that the diagonal is closed. In this case I think that: $X times X= {(x,y)| x,y in X }$ then $Delta(X)=Z(y-x)- {0}subset mathbb{A}^n $ but i'm not sure if this is closed or not. I think that it is open can you confirm that?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      To check if $X=mathbb{A}^n -{0}$ is separated is equivalent to check that the diagonal is closed. In this case I think that: $X times X= {(x,y)| x,y in X }$ then $Delta(X)=Z(y-x)- {0}subset mathbb{A}^n $ but i'm not sure if this is closed or not. I think that it is open can you confirm that?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      To check if $X=mathbb{A}^n -{0}$ is separated is equivalent to check that the diagonal is closed. In this case I think that: $X times X= {(x,y)| x,y in X }$ then $Delta(X)=Z(y-x)- {0}subset mathbb{A}^n $ but i'm not sure if this is closed or not. I think that it is open can you confirm that?







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Feb 3 at 0:13









      andresandres

      2439




      2439






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          There are several errors in your description of $Delta(X)$. First, it lives inside $Xtimes X$, not $Bbb A^n$. Secondly, you're using $x$ and $y$ for points of $X$ and then also as coordinates (when you subtract them), which doesn't really make sense. The second error is maybe not so bad, but the first is serious: it gives you the wrong answer. This variety is separated, as the diagonal copy of $X$ is in fact closed inside $Xtimes X$, exactly as the zero locus of $x_i-y_i$ where the $x_i$ and $y_i$ are coordinates on the first and second $X$, respectively.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            The answer to the title question is yes: a locally closed subvariety of a separated variety is separated. Cf. these notes






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097989%2fis-mathbba3-0-a-separated-variety%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              There are several errors in your description of $Delta(X)$. First, it lives inside $Xtimes X$, not $Bbb A^n$. Secondly, you're using $x$ and $y$ for points of $X$ and then also as coordinates (when you subtract them), which doesn't really make sense. The second error is maybe not so bad, but the first is serious: it gives you the wrong answer. This variety is separated, as the diagonal copy of $X$ is in fact closed inside $Xtimes X$, exactly as the zero locus of $x_i-y_i$ where the $x_i$ and $y_i$ are coordinates on the first and second $X$, respectively.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                There are several errors in your description of $Delta(X)$. First, it lives inside $Xtimes X$, not $Bbb A^n$. Secondly, you're using $x$ and $y$ for points of $X$ and then also as coordinates (when you subtract them), which doesn't really make sense. The second error is maybe not so bad, but the first is serious: it gives you the wrong answer. This variety is separated, as the diagonal copy of $X$ is in fact closed inside $Xtimes X$, exactly as the zero locus of $x_i-y_i$ where the $x_i$ and $y_i$ are coordinates on the first and second $X$, respectively.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  There are several errors in your description of $Delta(X)$. First, it lives inside $Xtimes X$, not $Bbb A^n$. Secondly, you're using $x$ and $y$ for points of $X$ and then also as coordinates (when you subtract them), which doesn't really make sense. The second error is maybe not so bad, but the first is serious: it gives you the wrong answer. This variety is separated, as the diagonal copy of $X$ is in fact closed inside $Xtimes X$, exactly as the zero locus of $x_i-y_i$ where the $x_i$ and $y_i$ are coordinates on the first and second $X$, respectively.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  There are several errors in your description of $Delta(X)$. First, it lives inside $Xtimes X$, not $Bbb A^n$. Secondly, you're using $x$ and $y$ for points of $X$ and then also as coordinates (when you subtract them), which doesn't really make sense. The second error is maybe not so bad, but the first is serious: it gives you the wrong answer. This variety is separated, as the diagonal copy of $X$ is in fact closed inside $Xtimes X$, exactly as the zero locus of $x_i-y_i$ where the $x_i$ and $y_i$ are coordinates on the first and second $X$, respectively.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 3 at 0:34









                  KReiserKReiser

                  10.1k21435




                  10.1k21435























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The answer to the title question is yes: a locally closed subvariety of a separated variety is separated. Cf. these notes






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The answer to the title question is yes: a locally closed subvariety of a separated variety is separated. Cf. these notes






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The answer to the title question is yes: a locally closed subvariety of a separated variety is separated. Cf. these notes






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The answer to the title question is yes: a locally closed subvariety of a separated variety is separated. Cf. these notes







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Feb 3 at 0:39









                          BenBen

                          4,373617




                          4,373617






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097989%2fis-mathbba3-0-a-separated-variety%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                              android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                              WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]