Proving that if $tX_1 + sX_2 stackrel{D}{=} sqrt{t^2 + s^2}X$ then $X stackrel{D}{=} N(0, delta^2)$












2












$begingroup$


Assume that for all $s, t in mathbb{R}$ the following property
$$tX_1 + sX_2 stackrel{D}{=} sqrt{t^2 + s^2}X tag{1}$$
is true.



Moreover $X_1, X_2, X$ are i. i. d.



My task is to prove that if $(1)$ stands then $X stackrel{D}{=}N(0, sigma^2)$. So $X$ is symmetrically normally distributed.



How can it be proved? I suppose that characteristic functions should be used but I have no idea how. I will appreciate any hints or tips.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 2 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 2 at 23:15










  • $begingroup$
    Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 14:30
















2












$begingroup$


Assume that for all $s, t in mathbb{R}$ the following property
$$tX_1 + sX_2 stackrel{D}{=} sqrt{t^2 + s^2}X tag{1}$$
is true.



Moreover $X_1, X_2, X$ are i. i. d.



My task is to prove that if $(1)$ stands then $X stackrel{D}{=}N(0, sigma^2)$. So $X$ is symmetrically normally distributed.



How can it be proved? I suppose that characteristic functions should be used but I have no idea how. I will appreciate any hints or tips.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 2 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 2 at 23:15










  • $begingroup$
    Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 14:30














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Assume that for all $s, t in mathbb{R}$ the following property
$$tX_1 + sX_2 stackrel{D}{=} sqrt{t^2 + s^2}X tag{1}$$
is true.



Moreover $X_1, X_2, X$ are i. i. d.



My task is to prove that if $(1)$ stands then $X stackrel{D}{=}N(0, sigma^2)$. So $X$ is symmetrically normally distributed.



How can it be proved? I suppose that characteristic functions should be used but I have no idea how. I will appreciate any hints or tips.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Assume that for all $s, t in mathbb{R}$ the following property
$$tX_1 + sX_2 stackrel{D}{=} sqrt{t^2 + s^2}X tag{1}$$
is true.



Moreover $X_1, X_2, X$ are i. i. d.



My task is to prove that if $(1)$ stands then $X stackrel{D}{=}N(0, sigma^2)$. So $X$ is symmetrically normally distributed.



How can it be proved? I suppose that characteristic functions should be used but I have no idea how. I will appreciate any hints or tips.







probability probability-distributions characteristic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 2 at 23:15







Hendrra

















asked Feb 2 at 23:01









HendrraHendrra

1,214516




1,214516








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 2 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 2 at 23:15










  • $begingroup$
    Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 14:30














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 2 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    @kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 2 at 23:15










  • $begingroup$
    Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 14:30








1




1




$begingroup$
Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 23:06




$begingroup$
Are you assuming something like $X_1$ and $X_2$ are iid, and have the same distribution as $X$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 23:06












$begingroup$
@kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrra
Feb 2 at 23:15




$begingroup$
@kimchilover Yes. I will edit my post. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Hendrra
Feb 2 at 23:15












$begingroup$
Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 4 at 14:30




$begingroup$
Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_theorem
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 4 at 14:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

There are 2 ingredients. As you guessed, characteristic functions are involved. Here is a hint outline.



Step 1: derive the identity $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ obeyed by the characteristic function $phi$. Then, somehow manipulate that to obtain a condition like $f(s)f(t)=f(s+t)$ or $g(s)+g(t)=g(s+t)$, valid for all real $s,t$.



Step 2: realize that this puts a severe limitation of what $f$ or $g$ (and ultimately $phi$) can be.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 4 at 12:45










  • $begingroup$
    You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 12:51



















2












$begingroup$

Hints: Assume that $X_1$ is not $0$ with positive probability. let $phi$ be the characteristic function of $X_1$. Then $phi (t) phi (s)=phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})$. If $phi (t)=0$ for some $t$ then we get $phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})=0$ for all $s$ and hence $phi (u)=0$ for all $u >|t|$. S how that this leads to a contradiction to the given property. Otherwise, by a well known fact there is a continuous function $psi$ such that $e^{psi (t)}=phi (t)$ and $psi (0)=0$. Let $g(t)=psi (sqrt t)$ for $t >0$. Show that $g(t+s)=g(t)+g(s)$. I will leave the rest of the argument to you.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097909%2fproving-that-if-tx-1-sx-2-stackreld-sqrtt2-s2x-then-x-stackre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    There are 2 ingredients. As you guessed, characteristic functions are involved. Here is a hint outline.



    Step 1: derive the identity $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ obeyed by the characteristic function $phi$. Then, somehow manipulate that to obtain a condition like $f(s)f(t)=f(s+t)$ or $g(s)+g(t)=g(s+t)$, valid for all real $s,t$.



    Step 2: realize that this puts a severe limitation of what $f$ or $g$ (and ultimately $phi$) can be.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
      $endgroup$
      – Hendrra
      Feb 4 at 12:45










    • $begingroup$
      You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      Feb 4 at 12:51
















    3












    $begingroup$

    There are 2 ingredients. As you guessed, characteristic functions are involved. Here is a hint outline.



    Step 1: derive the identity $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ obeyed by the characteristic function $phi$. Then, somehow manipulate that to obtain a condition like $f(s)f(t)=f(s+t)$ or $g(s)+g(t)=g(s+t)$, valid for all real $s,t$.



    Step 2: realize that this puts a severe limitation of what $f$ or $g$ (and ultimately $phi$) can be.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
      $endgroup$
      – Hendrra
      Feb 4 at 12:45










    • $begingroup$
      You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      Feb 4 at 12:51














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    There are 2 ingredients. As you guessed, characteristic functions are involved. Here is a hint outline.



    Step 1: derive the identity $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ obeyed by the characteristic function $phi$. Then, somehow manipulate that to obtain a condition like $f(s)f(t)=f(s+t)$ or $g(s)+g(t)=g(s+t)$, valid for all real $s,t$.



    Step 2: realize that this puts a severe limitation of what $f$ or $g$ (and ultimately $phi$) can be.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    There are 2 ingredients. As you guessed, characteristic functions are involved. Here is a hint outline.



    Step 1: derive the identity $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ obeyed by the characteristic function $phi$. Then, somehow manipulate that to obtain a condition like $f(s)f(t)=f(s+t)$ or $g(s)+g(t)=g(s+t)$, valid for all real $s,t$.



    Step 2: realize that this puts a severe limitation of what $f$ or $g$ (and ultimately $phi$) can be.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Feb 2 at 23:29









    kimchi loverkimchi lover

    11.8k31229




    11.8k31229












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
      $endgroup$
      – Hendrra
      Feb 4 at 12:45










    • $begingroup$
      You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      Feb 4 at 12:51


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
      $endgroup$
      – Hendrra
      Feb 4 at 12:45










    • $begingroup$
      You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
      $endgroup$
      – kimchi lover
      Feb 4 at 12:51
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 4 at 12:45




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer. How can $phi(s)phi(t)=phi(sqrt{s^2+t^2})$ be manipulated? It's hard to do anything with those functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Hendrra
    Feb 4 at 12:45












    $begingroup$
    You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 12:51




    $begingroup$
    You have $phi(t)phi(0)=phi(sqrt{t^2})$ so $phi(t)$ depends on $t^2$ alone. Write it as $phi(t)=f(t^2)$. Now $f(a+b)=f(a+b)$ for all $ge0$ arguments. And so on. As spelled out in Murthy's answer below.
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Feb 4 at 12:51











    2












    $begingroup$

    Hints: Assume that $X_1$ is not $0$ with positive probability. let $phi$ be the characteristic function of $X_1$. Then $phi (t) phi (s)=phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})$. If $phi (t)=0$ for some $t$ then we get $phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})=0$ for all $s$ and hence $phi (u)=0$ for all $u >|t|$. S how that this leads to a contradiction to the given property. Otherwise, by a well known fact there is a continuous function $psi$ such that $e^{psi (t)}=phi (t)$ and $psi (0)=0$. Let $g(t)=psi (sqrt t)$ for $t >0$. Show that $g(t+s)=g(t)+g(s)$. I will leave the rest of the argument to you.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Hints: Assume that $X_1$ is not $0$ with positive probability. let $phi$ be the characteristic function of $X_1$. Then $phi (t) phi (s)=phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})$. If $phi (t)=0$ for some $t$ then we get $phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})=0$ for all $s$ and hence $phi (u)=0$ for all $u >|t|$. S how that this leads to a contradiction to the given property. Otherwise, by a well known fact there is a continuous function $psi$ such that $e^{psi (t)}=phi (t)$ and $psi (0)=0$. Let $g(t)=psi (sqrt t)$ for $t >0$. Show that $g(t+s)=g(t)+g(s)$. I will leave the rest of the argument to you.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Hints: Assume that $X_1$ is not $0$ with positive probability. let $phi$ be the characteristic function of $X_1$. Then $phi (t) phi (s)=phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})$. If $phi (t)=0$ for some $t$ then we get $phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})=0$ for all $s$ and hence $phi (u)=0$ for all $u >|t|$. S how that this leads to a contradiction to the given property. Otherwise, by a well known fact there is a continuous function $psi$ such that $e^{psi (t)}=phi (t)$ and $psi (0)=0$. Let $g(t)=psi (sqrt t)$ for $t >0$. Show that $g(t+s)=g(t)+g(s)$. I will leave the rest of the argument to you.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Hints: Assume that $X_1$ is not $0$ with positive probability. let $phi$ be the characteristic function of $X_1$. Then $phi (t) phi (s)=phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})$. If $phi (t)=0$ for some $t$ then we get $phi (sqrt {t^{2}+s^{2}})=0$ for all $s$ and hence $phi (u)=0$ for all $u >|t|$. S how that this leads to a contradiction to the given property. Otherwise, by a well known fact there is a continuous function $psi$ such that $e^{psi (t)}=phi (t)$ and $psi (0)=0$. Let $g(t)=psi (sqrt t)$ for $t >0$. Show that $g(t+s)=g(t)+g(s)$. I will leave the rest of the argument to you.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 2 at 23:26









        Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

        74.8k53270




        74.8k53270






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097909%2fproving-that-if-tx-1-sx-2-stackreld-sqrtt2-s2x-then-x-stackre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]