Probability of periodic event happening within time period
$begingroup$
If my web page loses connection every 20 minutes and wipes out a form that takes 15 minutes to fill out what is the probability (odds) that I will get a form filled out and submitted without being interrupted? My best-worst guess is 1-(15/20) or 25% on the basis that there is a 15/20 percent chance I will get interrupted.
Maybe: The probability of exactly one periodic event occurring in a timeframe but no accepted answer there.
probability
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If my web page loses connection every 20 minutes and wipes out a form that takes 15 minutes to fill out what is the probability (odds) that I will get a form filled out and submitted without being interrupted? My best-worst guess is 1-(15/20) or 25% on the basis that there is a 15/20 percent chance I will get interrupted.
Maybe: The probability of exactly one periodic event occurring in a timeframe but no accepted answer there.
probability
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If my web page loses connection every 20 minutes and wipes out a form that takes 15 minutes to fill out what is the probability (odds) that I will get a form filled out and submitted without being interrupted? My best-worst guess is 1-(15/20) or 25% on the basis that there is a 15/20 percent chance I will get interrupted.
Maybe: The probability of exactly one periodic event occurring in a timeframe but no accepted answer there.
probability
$endgroup$
If my web page loses connection every 20 minutes and wipes out a form that takes 15 minutes to fill out what is the probability (odds) that I will get a form filled out and submitted without being interrupted? My best-worst guess is 1-(15/20) or 25% on the basis that there is a 15/20 percent chance I will get interrupted.
Maybe: The probability of exactly one periodic event occurring in a timeframe but no accepted answer there.
probability
probability
edited Jan 31 at 20:23
K.Nicholas
asked Jan 31 at 20:18
K.NicholasK.Nicholas
1085
1085
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095390%2fprobability-of-periodic-event-happening-within-time-period%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095390%2fprobability-of-periodic-event-happening-within-time-period%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You need to make some assumption on the distribution. Your answer would be correct on the (unlikely) assumption that the thing shuts down regularly every $20$ minutes. A more plausible assumption would be that there is a Poisson distribution here, or that the thing loses connection each minute with independent probability $frac 1{20}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:21
$begingroup$
Note; I suggest doing it both ways (binomial and Poisson). The answers should be very close and you check them against each other.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Well, actually the current sign-in times out every 20 minutes and asks the user to sign in again and reloads the page, so yes, periodically. So, 25% is actually correct?
$endgroup$
– K.Nicholas
Jan 31 at 20:24
$begingroup$
Really? But then you need to assume that you start the task at a uniformly random point in the $20$ minute window. If that is also true, then I agree with the $25%$ since you need to start the form within $5$ minutes of sign in. But is that a plasuible assumption?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Well, under those assumptions your solution looks good. To be fair, we can make it less artificial, if, say, we imagine that some internal setting (of which the user is unaware) is on a $20$ minute schedule and that the user's start time is entirely independent of this cycle.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 31 at 20:38