Topology Open Balls and Proving Open Sets
$begingroup$
Let $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Prove that the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ is an open set (rigorously!).
I am having trouble with the problem above. If I am understanding it correctly I should be able to set $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Then the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ centered at $ x $ of radius $ ε $ is the set {$ x ∈ ℝ^n | d(x,x_o) < ε $}. If I am correct thus far then a subset $ usubseteqℝ^n $ is open if $ forall$ $ x in u$, $ exists$ $ ε>0 $ such that $ B_ε (x)subseteq u $.
This is as far as I can get. I do not know if this is all I have to do or if I need to do something else? If someone could Help out I would really appreciate it!
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Prove that the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ is an open set (rigorously!).
I am having trouble with the problem above. If I am understanding it correctly I should be able to set $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Then the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ centered at $ x $ of radius $ ε $ is the set {$ x ∈ ℝ^n | d(x,x_o) < ε $}. If I am correct thus far then a subset $ usubseteqℝ^n $ is open if $ forall$ $ x in u$, $ exists$ $ ε>0 $ such that $ B_ε (x)subseteq u $.
This is as far as I can get. I do not know if this is all I have to do or if I need to do something else? If someone could Help out I would really appreciate it!
general-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Prove that the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ is an open set (rigorously!).
I am having trouble with the problem above. If I am understanding it correctly I should be able to set $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Then the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ centered at $ x $ of radius $ ε $ is the set {$ x ∈ ℝ^n | d(x,x_o) < ε $}. If I am correct thus far then a subset $ usubseteqℝ^n $ is open if $ forall$ $ x in u$, $ exists$ $ ε>0 $ such that $ B_ε (x)subseteq u $.
This is as far as I can get. I do not know if this is all I have to do or if I need to do something else? If someone could Help out I would really appreciate it!
general-topology
$endgroup$
Let $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Prove that the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ is an open set (rigorously!).
I am having trouble with the problem above. If I am understanding it correctly I should be able to set $ x ∈ ℝ^n $ and $ ε > 0 $. Then the open ball $ B_ε(x) $ centered at $ x $ of radius $ ε $ is the set {$ x ∈ ℝ^n | d(x,x_o) < ε $}. If I am correct thus far then a subset $ usubseteqℝ^n $ is open if $ forall$ $ x in u$, $ exists$ $ ε>0 $ such that $ B_ε (x)subseteq u $.
This is as far as I can get. I do not know if this is all I have to do or if I need to do something else? If someone could Help out I would really appreciate it!
general-topology
general-topology
edited Jan 31 at 20:54
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.9k8160252
65.9k8160252
asked Jan 31 at 20:25
DataD96DataD96
295
295
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Then $d(y,x)=r<epsilon$. Now take any $tin (0,epsilon-r)$. Can you show that $B_t(y)subseteq B_epsilon(x)$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095403%2ftopology-open-balls-and-proving-open-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Then $d(y,x)=r<epsilon$. Now take any $tin (0,epsilon-r)$. Can you show that $B_t(y)subseteq B_epsilon(x)$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Then $d(y,x)=r<epsilon$. Now take any $tin (0,epsilon-r)$. Can you show that $B_t(y)subseteq B_epsilon(x)$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Then $d(y,x)=r<epsilon$. Now take any $tin (0,epsilon-r)$. Can you show that $B_t(y)subseteq B_epsilon(x)$?
$endgroup$
Let $yin B_epsilon(x)$. Then $d(y,x)=r<epsilon$. Now take any $tin (0,epsilon-r)$. Can you show that $B_t(y)subseteq B_epsilon(x)$?
answered Jan 31 at 20:30
MarkMark
10.5k1622
10.5k1622
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
would it be $ d(y,x) $ $ le $ $ d(y,x_o) + d(x_o,x) $ $ lt $ $ t + d(x_0,x) = epsilon $ which would show that $ y in B_epsilon (x) $ which would also show that $ B_t (y) subseteq B_epsilon (x) $ ?
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 20:47
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
To the proposer: Yes. Exactly right.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Jan 31 at 20:52
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
No, $d(y,x)<epsilon$ is something you already know. You need to show that any element in $B_t(y)$ is in $B_epsilon(x)$. So let $zin B_t(y)$. Then $d(z,x)leq d(z,y)+d(y,x)<t+r<(epsilon-r)+r=epsilon$. Hence $z in B_epsilon(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Jan 31 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
$begingroup$
Oh, okay that makes sense! Thank you for your help!
$endgroup$
– DataD96
Jan 31 at 21:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095403%2ftopology-open-balls-and-proving-open-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
General idea: given a point in the open ball, $p in B_epsilon(x)$, can you find $delta$ such that $B_delta(p) subset B_epsilon(x)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Joe
Jan 31 at 20:29