What Algebra law is this called: $|alpha beta| le |alpha| |beta|$ for complex numbers












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to remember the name of this law in complex number algebra:



$$|alpha beta| le |alpha| |beta|$$



Where:



$$alpha = Re{alpha}+ i Im{alpha}$$
$$beta = Re{beta}+ i Im{beta}$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 20:51












  • $begingroup$
    its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 20:58












  • $begingroup$
    could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:03












  • $begingroup$
    There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 21:04


















0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to remember the name of this law in complex number algebra:



$$|alpha beta| le |alpha| |beta|$$



Where:



$$alpha = Re{alpha}+ i Im{alpha}$$
$$beta = Re{beta}+ i Im{beta}$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 20:51












  • $begingroup$
    its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 20:58












  • $begingroup$
    could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:03












  • $begingroup$
    There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 21:04
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm trying to remember the name of this law in complex number algebra:



$$|alpha beta| le |alpha| |beta|$$



Where:



$$alpha = Re{alpha}+ i Im{alpha}$$
$$beta = Re{beta}+ i Im{beta}$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm trying to remember the name of this law in complex number algebra:



$$|alpha beta| le |alpha| |beta|$$



Where:



$$alpha = Re{alpha}+ i Im{alpha}$$
$$beta = Re{beta}+ i Im{beta}$$







complex-analysis complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 2 at 20:48









MrCasualityMrCasuality

82




82








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 20:51












  • $begingroup$
    its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 20:58












  • $begingroup$
    could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:03












  • $begingroup$
    There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 21:04
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 20:51












  • $begingroup$
    its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 20:58












  • $begingroup$
    could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:03












  • $begingroup$
    There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Feb 2 at 21:04










1




1




$begingroup$
It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Feb 2 at 20:51






$begingroup$
It is not an Algebra law, but just an equation: $|zw|=|z||w|$ for complex $z,w$. It is sometimes called "norm", and it is multiplicative. A proof is given here.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Feb 2 at 20:51














$begingroup$
its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 20:58






$begingroup$
its a law because I started with the magnitude formed by the product of two complex numbers and then inferred that its less than or equal to the magnitude of each complex number individually and then multiplied together.... and this equation always holds.... its never less than...always greater-than or equal-to
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 20:58














$begingroup$
could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:03






$begingroup$
could be a linear algebra property as well... I was just trying to avoid dealing with dot products...so I was looking for the complex algebra law name to get around thinking about dot products...
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:03














$begingroup$
There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Feb 2 at 21:04






$begingroup$
There are no dot products here anyway. Just complex numbers and their absolute value.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Feb 2 at 21:04












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

For complex this is an immediate consequence of $|z|^2=zbar z$ and associative property of multiplication.



Indeed $|ab|^2=(ab)(overline{ab})=abbar abar b=(abar a)(bbar b)=|a|^2|b|^2$



And since $|cdot|$ is positive then we can get rid of squares.



For a more general result, you may be interested in this post:



A name for the property $ | x star y | = | x | | y | $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:07












  • $begingroup$
    This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Feb 2 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Moore
    Feb 2 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:28





















1












$begingroup$

You not only have $vert alpha beta vert le vert alpha vert vert beta vert$ but even $vert alpha beta vert = vert alpha vert vert beta vert$.



The complex modulus is multiplicative






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Feb 2 at 21:04












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097786%2fwhat-algebra-law-is-this-called-alpha-beta-le-alpha-beta-for-compl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

For complex this is an immediate consequence of $|z|^2=zbar z$ and associative property of multiplication.



Indeed $|ab|^2=(ab)(overline{ab})=abbar abar b=(abar a)(bbar b)=|a|^2|b|^2$



And since $|cdot|$ is positive then we can get rid of squares.



For a more general result, you may be interested in this post:



A name for the property $ | x star y | = | x | | y | $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:07












  • $begingroup$
    This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Feb 2 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Moore
    Feb 2 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:28


















2












$begingroup$

For complex this is an immediate consequence of $|z|^2=zbar z$ and associative property of multiplication.



Indeed $|ab|^2=(ab)(overline{ab})=abbar abar b=(abar a)(bbar b)=|a|^2|b|^2$



And since $|cdot|$ is positive then we can get rid of squares.



For a more general result, you may be interested in this post:



A name for the property $ | x star y | = | x | | y | $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:07












  • $begingroup$
    This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Feb 2 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Moore
    Feb 2 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:28
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

For complex this is an immediate consequence of $|z|^2=zbar z$ and associative property of multiplication.



Indeed $|ab|^2=(ab)(overline{ab})=abbar abar b=(abar a)(bbar b)=|a|^2|b|^2$



And since $|cdot|$ is positive then we can get rid of squares.



For a more general result, you may be interested in this post:



A name for the property $ | x star y | = | x | | y | $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



For complex this is an immediate consequence of $|z|^2=zbar z$ and associative property of multiplication.



Indeed $|ab|^2=(ab)(overline{ab})=abbar abar b=(abar a)(bbar b)=|a|^2|b|^2$



And since $|cdot|$ is positive then we can get rid of squares.



For a more general result, you may be interested in this post:



A name for the property $ | x star y | = | x | | y | $.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 2 at 21:02









zwimzwim

12.7k832




12.7k832












  • $begingroup$
    what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:07












  • $begingroup$
    This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Feb 2 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Moore
    Feb 2 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:28




















  • $begingroup$
    what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:07












  • $begingroup$
    This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Feb 2 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Moore
    Feb 2 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:28


















$begingroup$
what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:07






$begingroup$
what's the meaning of the "double absolute value braces" is that just a fancy absolute value brace or does it have special meaning? also, is the "star" implicit if you don't write it in a complex algebra equation?
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:07














$begingroup$
This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Feb 2 at 21:09






$begingroup$
This is used for a norm en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norm_(mathematics), this is a multidimensional extension of absolute value. The star here, just represent any binary operation similar to a dot product.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Feb 2 at 21:09














$begingroup$
thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
$endgroup$
– Bill Moore
Feb 2 at 21:14




$begingroup$
thanks... i guess my math book is just lax about calling norms as absolute values...
$endgroup$
– Bill Moore
Feb 2 at 21:14












$begingroup$
That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:28






$begingroup$
That's interesting... so you only need the inequality if we are dealing with vectors? instead of scalar complex number? its actually exactly equal when dealing with scalar numbers. that's actually, a little bit confusing because the book was saying that complex numbers are vectors of real and imaginary numbers
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:28













1












$begingroup$

You not only have $vert alpha beta vert le vert alpha vert vert beta vert$ but even $vert alpha beta vert = vert alpha vert vert beta vert$.



The complex modulus is multiplicative






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Feb 2 at 21:04
















1












$begingroup$

You not only have $vert alpha beta vert le vert alpha vert vert beta vert$ but even $vert alpha beta vert = vert alpha vert vert beta vert$.



The complex modulus is multiplicative






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Feb 2 at 21:04














1












1








1





$begingroup$

You not only have $vert alpha beta vert le vert alpha vert vert beta vert$ but even $vert alpha beta vert = vert alpha vert vert beta vert$.



The complex modulus is multiplicative






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You not only have $vert alpha beta vert le vert alpha vert vert beta vert$ but even $vert alpha beta vert = vert alpha vert vert beta vert$.



The complex modulus is multiplicative







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 2 at 20:53









mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net

26.9k22158




26.9k22158












  • $begingroup$
    it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Feb 2 at 21:04


















  • $begingroup$
    it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
    $endgroup$
    – MrCasuality
    Feb 2 at 21:01






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Feb 2 at 21:04
















$begingroup$
it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:01




$begingroup$
it only equals if $alpha$ and $beta$ are scalars, or they have the same complex phase angle.
$endgroup$
– MrCasuality
Feb 2 at 21:01




1




1




$begingroup$
@MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 2 at 21:04




$begingroup$
@MrCasuality You’re confusing sum and multiplication.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Feb 2 at 21:04


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097786%2fwhat-algebra-law-is-this-called-alpha-beta-le-alpha-beta-for-compl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith