What is the distribution followed by this function of random variables
$begingroup$
$X$ and $Y$ are independently distributed $U(0,1)$ random variables (Uniform distribution)
Find the Variance of the random variable
$U = dfrac{ln(X)}{( ln(X)+ln(1-Y) )}$
I know $-ln(X)$ follows $exp(1)$ and $(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$
Therefore it becomes $exp(1)$ in the numerator and $text{gamma}(1,2)$ in the denominator.
I dont know what to do next.
probability statistics probability-distributions random-variables statistical-inference
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
$X$ and $Y$ are independently distributed $U(0,1)$ random variables (Uniform distribution)
Find the Variance of the random variable
$U = dfrac{ln(X)}{( ln(X)+ln(1-Y) )}$
I know $-ln(X)$ follows $exp(1)$ and $(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$
Therefore it becomes $exp(1)$ in the numerator and $text{gamma}(1,2)$ in the denominator.
I dont know what to do next.
probability statistics probability-distributions random-variables statistical-inference
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
1
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
1
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
$X$ and $Y$ are independently distributed $U(0,1)$ random variables (Uniform distribution)
Find the Variance of the random variable
$U = dfrac{ln(X)}{( ln(X)+ln(1-Y) )}$
I know $-ln(X)$ follows $exp(1)$ and $(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$
Therefore it becomes $exp(1)$ in the numerator and $text{gamma}(1,2)$ in the denominator.
I dont know what to do next.
probability statistics probability-distributions random-variables statistical-inference
$endgroup$
$X$ and $Y$ are independently distributed $U(0,1)$ random variables (Uniform distribution)
Find the Variance of the random variable
$U = dfrac{ln(X)}{( ln(X)+ln(1-Y) )}$
I know $-ln(X)$ follows $exp(1)$ and $(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$
Therefore it becomes $exp(1)$ in the numerator and $text{gamma}(1,2)$ in the denominator.
I dont know what to do next.
probability statistics probability-distributions random-variables statistical-inference
probability statistics probability-distributions random-variables statistical-inference
edited Feb 3 at 3:35
Thomas Shelby
4,7382727
4,7382727
asked Feb 2 at 18:00
Vishesh ChughVishesh Chugh
65
65
1
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
1
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
1
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39
|
show 4 more comments
1
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
1
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
1
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39
1
1
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
1
1
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
1
1
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
1
1
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39
|
show 4 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Write as
$$
U=frac{-ln X}{-ln X-ln (1-Y)}
$$
As you noted $-ln Xsim exp(1)$ and because $1-Ysim text{Unif}(0,1)$ it folows that $-ln(1-Y)sim exp(1)$. Since $-ln X$ and $-ln (1-Y)$ are independent it follows that $Usim text{Beta}(1,1)$ which is the same as a uniform random variable on $(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$G(lambda)=e^{-x}x^{lambda-1};x>0,lambda>0 $ and $B_1(u,v)={x^{u-1}}(1-x)^{v-1} ; 0<x<1 ,u>0,v>0 $
$X sim G(lambda) $ and $Ysim G(m)$
$dfrac{X}{X+Y} sim B_1(lambda,m)$
And good luck for JAM $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097577%2fwhat-is-the-distribution-followed-by-this-function-of-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Write as
$$
U=frac{-ln X}{-ln X-ln (1-Y)}
$$
As you noted $-ln Xsim exp(1)$ and because $1-Ysim text{Unif}(0,1)$ it folows that $-ln(1-Y)sim exp(1)$. Since $-ln X$ and $-ln (1-Y)$ are independent it follows that $Usim text{Beta}(1,1)$ which is the same as a uniform random variable on $(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Write as
$$
U=frac{-ln X}{-ln X-ln (1-Y)}
$$
As you noted $-ln Xsim exp(1)$ and because $1-Ysim text{Unif}(0,1)$ it folows that $-ln(1-Y)sim exp(1)$. Since $-ln X$ and $-ln (1-Y)$ are independent it follows that $Usim text{Beta}(1,1)$ which is the same as a uniform random variable on $(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Write as
$$
U=frac{-ln X}{-ln X-ln (1-Y)}
$$
As you noted $-ln Xsim exp(1)$ and because $1-Ysim text{Unif}(0,1)$ it folows that $-ln(1-Y)sim exp(1)$. Since $-ln X$ and $-ln (1-Y)$ are independent it follows that $Usim text{Beta}(1,1)$ which is the same as a uniform random variable on $(0,1)$.
$endgroup$
Write as
$$
U=frac{-ln X}{-ln X-ln (1-Y)}
$$
As you noted $-ln Xsim exp(1)$ and because $1-Ysim text{Unif}(0,1)$ it folows that $-ln(1-Y)sim exp(1)$. Since $-ln X$ and $-ln (1-Y)$ are independent it follows that $Usim text{Beta}(1,1)$ which is the same as a uniform random variable on $(0,1)$.
answered Feb 2 at 18:49


Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
22.9k41552
22.9k41552
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
$begingroup$
I was stuck on this for so long. Thanks a lot mate.
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 2:09
2
2
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@VisheshChugh Sorry but if you were stuck before, you should still be stuck since this answer does not show you how to prove the result but merely invokes a more general fact (which you probably do not know how to prove either) to deduce this one. Strange world...
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
$begingroup$
@Did There's a thing known as confusion and that shouldn't be so hard for you to understand as you so much already. Don't know why you'd be so irrelevant. Strange world. :) :)
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 14 at 9:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$G(lambda)=e^{-x}x^{lambda-1};x>0,lambda>0 $ and $B_1(u,v)={x^{u-1}}(1-x)^{v-1} ; 0<x<1 ,u>0,v>0 $
$X sim G(lambda) $ and $Ysim G(m)$
$dfrac{X}{X+Y} sim B_1(lambda,m)$
And good luck for JAM $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$G(lambda)=e^{-x}x^{lambda-1};x>0,lambda>0 $ and $B_1(u,v)={x^{u-1}}(1-x)^{v-1} ; 0<x<1 ,u>0,v>0 $
$X sim G(lambda) $ and $Ysim G(m)$
$dfrac{X}{X+Y} sim B_1(lambda,m)$
And good luck for JAM $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$G(lambda)=e^{-x}x^{lambda-1};x>0,lambda>0 $ and $B_1(u,v)={x^{u-1}}(1-x)^{v-1} ; 0<x<1 ,u>0,v>0 $
$X sim G(lambda) $ and $Ysim G(m)$
$dfrac{X}{X+Y} sim B_1(lambda,m)$
And good luck for JAM $2019$
$endgroup$
$G(lambda)=e^{-x}x^{lambda-1};x>0,lambda>0 $ and $B_1(u,v)={x^{u-1}}(1-x)^{v-1} ; 0<x<1 ,u>0,v>0 $
$X sim G(lambda) $ and $Ysim G(m)$
$dfrac{X}{X+Y} sim B_1(lambda,m)$
And good luck for JAM $2019$
answered Feb 3 at 3:41
Daman deepDaman deep
756420
756420
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
Thanks mate. Haha how do you know? You taking it too? This year?
$endgroup$
– Vishesh Chugh
Feb 3 at 10:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
$begingroup$
This question came in any previous year, I solved it few days back!
$endgroup$
– Daman deep
Feb 3 at 11:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097577%2fwhat-is-the-distribution-followed-by-this-function-of-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You wrote "and $ln(1-Y)$ is also $U(0,1)$. But this is not true. Write your ratio as $S/(S+T)$ where $S,T$ are iid exponential rvs.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:08
1
$begingroup$
@kimchilover - presumably "and also $-ln(1-Y) sim exp(1)$" or something similar was intended
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 2 at 18:13
$begingroup$
@Henry I agree.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Feb 2 at 18:15
1
$begingroup$
You will see $U$ has a standard distribution if you derive it (say, by a change of variables or using well-known relations between distributions), from which the variance follows immediately.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
@Vishesh You are not showing your work/attempts, so it's hard to know where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Feb 2 at 18:39