Problem about strictly normed spaces.
$begingroup$
A normed vector space $(V,Vert cdot Vert)$ is strictly normed if
$$Vert x + yVert = Vert x Vert + Vert y Vert$$
with $x,yneq 0$ only if $y = lambda x$ where $lambda >0$.
(a) Prove that $V$ is strictly normed if only if the sphere
$$sigma_{1}(0) = {x in V mid Vert x Vert = 1}$$
contains no segments.
(b) Give examples of strictly normed spaces and not strictly normed spaces.
My attempt.
(a) Suppose that $V$ is strictly normed. Take $x, y in sigma_{1}(0)$ with $x neq y$. If $y = alpha x$ with $alpha > 0$, then
$$1 = Vert y Vert = alpha Vert x Vert = alpha Longrightarrow y = x.$$
Moreover
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert = Vert lambda x Vert + Vert(1-lambda)yVert$$
only if $(1-lambda)y = alpha lambda x$, that is, $displaystyle y = left(frac{lambdaalpha}{1-lambda}right)x$ (we can take $lambda in (0,1)$), then
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert < lambdaVert x Vert + (1-lambda)Vert y Vert = 1$$
and if $lambda x + (1-lambda)y in sigma_{1}(0)$, $Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)y Vert = 1$ and so, $1<1$, an absurd!
For converse, I take $x,y in V$ with $x neq y$. So, $displaystyle frac{x}{Vert x Vert},frac{y}{Vert y Vert} in sigma_{1}(0)$. But I dont know how to use the hypothesis. Can someone help me?
Edit.
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert leq lambda frac{Vert x Vert}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{Vert y Vert}{Vert y Vert} = 1,$$
but, if $lambda in (0,1)$,
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert notin sigma_{1}(0),$$
then
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert < 1.$$
(b) Consider the Euclidean norm $Vert cdot Vert_{E}$ and the sum norm $Vert cdot Vert_{infty}$. So, $(mathbb{R}^{n},Vert cdot Vert_{E})$ is strictly normed and $(mathbb{R}^{n}, Vert cdot Vert_{infty})$ is not strictly normed.
Here, I didnt write proof of this, I'm just using the previous equivalence. Please, correct me if Im wrong.
Can someone knows another examples of not strictly normed?
metric-spaces normed-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A normed vector space $(V,Vert cdot Vert)$ is strictly normed if
$$Vert x + yVert = Vert x Vert + Vert y Vert$$
with $x,yneq 0$ only if $y = lambda x$ where $lambda >0$.
(a) Prove that $V$ is strictly normed if only if the sphere
$$sigma_{1}(0) = {x in V mid Vert x Vert = 1}$$
contains no segments.
(b) Give examples of strictly normed spaces and not strictly normed spaces.
My attempt.
(a) Suppose that $V$ is strictly normed. Take $x, y in sigma_{1}(0)$ with $x neq y$. If $y = alpha x$ with $alpha > 0$, then
$$1 = Vert y Vert = alpha Vert x Vert = alpha Longrightarrow y = x.$$
Moreover
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert = Vert lambda x Vert + Vert(1-lambda)yVert$$
only if $(1-lambda)y = alpha lambda x$, that is, $displaystyle y = left(frac{lambdaalpha}{1-lambda}right)x$ (we can take $lambda in (0,1)$), then
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert < lambdaVert x Vert + (1-lambda)Vert y Vert = 1$$
and if $lambda x + (1-lambda)y in sigma_{1}(0)$, $Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)y Vert = 1$ and so, $1<1$, an absurd!
For converse, I take $x,y in V$ with $x neq y$. So, $displaystyle frac{x}{Vert x Vert},frac{y}{Vert y Vert} in sigma_{1}(0)$. But I dont know how to use the hypothesis. Can someone help me?
Edit.
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert leq lambda frac{Vert x Vert}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{Vert y Vert}{Vert y Vert} = 1,$$
but, if $lambda in (0,1)$,
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert notin sigma_{1}(0),$$
then
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert < 1.$$
(b) Consider the Euclidean norm $Vert cdot Vert_{E}$ and the sum norm $Vert cdot Vert_{infty}$. So, $(mathbb{R}^{n},Vert cdot Vert_{E})$ is strictly normed and $(mathbb{R}^{n}, Vert cdot Vert_{infty})$ is not strictly normed.
Here, I didnt write proof of this, I'm just using the previous equivalence. Please, correct me if Im wrong.
Can someone knows another examples of not strictly normed?
metric-spaces normed-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
1
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A normed vector space $(V,Vert cdot Vert)$ is strictly normed if
$$Vert x + yVert = Vert x Vert + Vert y Vert$$
with $x,yneq 0$ only if $y = lambda x$ where $lambda >0$.
(a) Prove that $V$ is strictly normed if only if the sphere
$$sigma_{1}(0) = {x in V mid Vert x Vert = 1}$$
contains no segments.
(b) Give examples of strictly normed spaces and not strictly normed spaces.
My attempt.
(a) Suppose that $V$ is strictly normed. Take $x, y in sigma_{1}(0)$ with $x neq y$. If $y = alpha x$ with $alpha > 0$, then
$$1 = Vert y Vert = alpha Vert x Vert = alpha Longrightarrow y = x.$$
Moreover
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert = Vert lambda x Vert + Vert(1-lambda)yVert$$
only if $(1-lambda)y = alpha lambda x$, that is, $displaystyle y = left(frac{lambdaalpha}{1-lambda}right)x$ (we can take $lambda in (0,1)$), then
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert < lambdaVert x Vert + (1-lambda)Vert y Vert = 1$$
and if $lambda x + (1-lambda)y in sigma_{1}(0)$, $Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)y Vert = 1$ and so, $1<1$, an absurd!
For converse, I take $x,y in V$ with $x neq y$. So, $displaystyle frac{x}{Vert x Vert},frac{y}{Vert y Vert} in sigma_{1}(0)$. But I dont know how to use the hypothesis. Can someone help me?
Edit.
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert leq lambda frac{Vert x Vert}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{Vert y Vert}{Vert y Vert} = 1,$$
but, if $lambda in (0,1)$,
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert notin sigma_{1}(0),$$
then
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert < 1.$$
(b) Consider the Euclidean norm $Vert cdot Vert_{E}$ and the sum norm $Vert cdot Vert_{infty}$. So, $(mathbb{R}^{n},Vert cdot Vert_{E})$ is strictly normed and $(mathbb{R}^{n}, Vert cdot Vert_{infty})$ is not strictly normed.
Here, I didnt write proof of this, I'm just using the previous equivalence. Please, correct me if Im wrong.
Can someone knows another examples of not strictly normed?
metric-spaces normed-spaces
$endgroup$
A normed vector space $(V,Vert cdot Vert)$ is strictly normed if
$$Vert x + yVert = Vert x Vert + Vert y Vert$$
with $x,yneq 0$ only if $y = lambda x$ where $lambda >0$.
(a) Prove that $V$ is strictly normed if only if the sphere
$$sigma_{1}(0) = {x in V mid Vert x Vert = 1}$$
contains no segments.
(b) Give examples of strictly normed spaces and not strictly normed spaces.
My attempt.
(a) Suppose that $V$ is strictly normed. Take $x, y in sigma_{1}(0)$ with $x neq y$. If $y = alpha x$ with $alpha > 0$, then
$$1 = Vert y Vert = alpha Vert x Vert = alpha Longrightarrow y = x.$$
Moreover
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert = Vert lambda x Vert + Vert(1-lambda)yVert$$
only if $(1-lambda)y = alpha lambda x$, that is, $displaystyle y = left(frac{lambdaalpha}{1-lambda}right)x$ (we can take $lambda in (0,1)$), then
$$Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)yVert < lambdaVert x Vert + (1-lambda)Vert y Vert = 1$$
and if $lambda x + (1-lambda)y in sigma_{1}(0)$, $Vert lambda x + (1-lambda)y Vert = 1$ and so, $1<1$, an absurd!
For converse, I take $x,y in V$ with $x neq y$. So, $displaystyle frac{x}{Vert x Vert},frac{y}{Vert y Vert} in sigma_{1}(0)$. But I dont know how to use the hypothesis. Can someone help me?
Edit.
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert leq lambda frac{Vert x Vert}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{Vert y Vert}{Vert y Vert} = 1,$$
but, if $lambda in (0,1)$,
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert notin sigma_{1}(0),$$
then
$$leftVert lambda frac{x}{Vert x Vert} + (1-lambda)frac{y}{Vert y Vert}rightVert < 1.$$
(b) Consider the Euclidean norm $Vert cdot Vert_{E}$ and the sum norm $Vert cdot Vert_{infty}$. So, $(mathbb{R}^{n},Vert cdot Vert_{E})$ is strictly normed and $(mathbb{R}^{n}, Vert cdot Vert_{infty})$ is not strictly normed.
Here, I didnt write proof of this, I'm just using the previous equivalence. Please, correct me if Im wrong.
Can someone knows another examples of not strictly normed?
metric-spaces normed-spaces
metric-spaces normed-spaces
edited Jan 5 at 2:58
Lucas Corrêa
asked Jan 5 at 2:13
Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa
1,6051321
1,6051321
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
1
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
1
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
1
1
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$
frac{x+y}{|x|+|y|}=frac{|x|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{x}{|x|}Big)+frac{|y|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{y}{|y|}Big)
$$
This shows that $v:=(x+y)/(|x|+|y|)$ is on the segment connecting $x/|x|$ to $y/|y|$. Since the unit sphere has no segments, $|v|$ cannot be $1$. By the triangle inequality, $|v|le 1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $V$'s unit sphere contains no line segments, and $x, y in V$ such that
$$|x + y| = |x| + |y|.$$
Let $z$ be the point on the line segment $[0, x + y]$ that you would expect to be distance $|x|$ from $0$ and distance $|y|$ from $x + y$. Working this out, you'll get
$$z = frac{|x|(x + y)}{|x + y|}.$$
Note that $z$ lies on the spheres $S[0; |x|]$ and $S[x + y; |y|]$.
Also note the same is true for $x$. That is, $x$ and $z$ lie in both spheres. Let's suppose they're different points. Since they both lie in $S[0; |x|]$, it follows from the convexity of the ball that $frac{x + z}{2}$ must lie in the open ball $B(0; |x|)$, which is to say $left|frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x|$. On the same token, we have $frac{x + z}{2} in B(x + y, |y|)$. Hence,
$$|x + y| le left|frac{x + z}{2}right| + left|x + y - frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x| + |y| = |x + y|,$$
which is a contradiction. Thus, $x = z$, and from this it's easy to see that $x$ and $y$ are parallel.
As for your other question, you can form a norm from a unit ball. The eligible unit balls are precisely the non-empty symmetric, closed, bounded, convex subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$. This gives you a lot of scope to find norms that are strict or non-strict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062340%2fproblem-about-strictly-normed-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$
frac{x+y}{|x|+|y|}=frac{|x|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{x}{|x|}Big)+frac{|y|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{y}{|y|}Big)
$$
This shows that $v:=(x+y)/(|x|+|y|)$ is on the segment connecting $x/|x|$ to $y/|y|$. Since the unit sphere has no segments, $|v|$ cannot be $1$. By the triangle inequality, $|v|le 1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
frac{x+y}{|x|+|y|}=frac{|x|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{x}{|x|}Big)+frac{|y|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{y}{|y|}Big)
$$
This shows that $v:=(x+y)/(|x|+|y|)$ is on the segment connecting $x/|x|$ to $y/|y|$. Since the unit sphere has no segments, $|v|$ cannot be $1$. By the triangle inequality, $|v|le 1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$
frac{x+y}{|x|+|y|}=frac{|x|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{x}{|x|}Big)+frac{|y|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{y}{|y|}Big)
$$
This shows that $v:=(x+y)/(|x|+|y|)$ is on the segment connecting $x/|x|$ to $y/|y|$. Since the unit sphere has no segments, $|v|$ cannot be $1$. By the triangle inequality, $|v|le 1$.
$endgroup$
$$
frac{x+y}{|x|+|y|}=frac{|x|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{x}{|x|}Big)+frac{|y|}{|x|+|y|}Big(frac{y}{|y|}Big)
$$
This shows that $v:=(x+y)/(|x|+|y|)$ is on the segment connecting $x/|x|$ to $y/|y|$. Since the unit sphere has no segments, $|v|$ cannot be $1$. By the triangle inequality, $|v|le 1$.
answered Jan 5 at 2:56
Mike EarnestMike Earnest
21.4k11951
21.4k11951
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $V$'s unit sphere contains no line segments, and $x, y in V$ such that
$$|x + y| = |x| + |y|.$$
Let $z$ be the point on the line segment $[0, x + y]$ that you would expect to be distance $|x|$ from $0$ and distance $|y|$ from $x + y$. Working this out, you'll get
$$z = frac{|x|(x + y)}{|x + y|}.$$
Note that $z$ lies on the spheres $S[0; |x|]$ and $S[x + y; |y|]$.
Also note the same is true for $x$. That is, $x$ and $z$ lie in both spheres. Let's suppose they're different points. Since they both lie in $S[0; |x|]$, it follows from the convexity of the ball that $frac{x + z}{2}$ must lie in the open ball $B(0; |x|)$, which is to say $left|frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x|$. On the same token, we have $frac{x + z}{2} in B(x + y, |y|)$. Hence,
$$|x + y| le left|frac{x + z}{2}right| + left|x + y - frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x| + |y| = |x + y|,$$
which is a contradiction. Thus, $x = z$, and from this it's easy to see that $x$ and $y$ are parallel.
As for your other question, you can form a norm from a unit ball. The eligible unit balls are precisely the non-empty symmetric, closed, bounded, convex subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$. This gives you a lot of scope to find norms that are strict or non-strict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $V$'s unit sphere contains no line segments, and $x, y in V$ such that
$$|x + y| = |x| + |y|.$$
Let $z$ be the point on the line segment $[0, x + y]$ that you would expect to be distance $|x|$ from $0$ and distance $|y|$ from $x + y$. Working this out, you'll get
$$z = frac{|x|(x + y)}{|x + y|}.$$
Note that $z$ lies on the spheres $S[0; |x|]$ and $S[x + y; |y|]$.
Also note the same is true for $x$. That is, $x$ and $z$ lie in both spheres. Let's suppose they're different points. Since they both lie in $S[0; |x|]$, it follows from the convexity of the ball that $frac{x + z}{2}$ must lie in the open ball $B(0; |x|)$, which is to say $left|frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x|$. On the same token, we have $frac{x + z}{2} in B(x + y, |y|)$. Hence,
$$|x + y| le left|frac{x + z}{2}right| + left|x + y - frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x| + |y| = |x + y|,$$
which is a contradiction. Thus, $x = z$, and from this it's easy to see that $x$ and $y$ are parallel.
As for your other question, you can form a norm from a unit ball. The eligible unit balls are precisely the non-empty symmetric, closed, bounded, convex subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$. This gives you a lot of scope to find norms that are strict or non-strict.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $V$'s unit sphere contains no line segments, and $x, y in V$ such that
$$|x + y| = |x| + |y|.$$
Let $z$ be the point on the line segment $[0, x + y]$ that you would expect to be distance $|x|$ from $0$ and distance $|y|$ from $x + y$. Working this out, you'll get
$$z = frac{|x|(x + y)}{|x + y|}.$$
Note that $z$ lies on the spheres $S[0; |x|]$ and $S[x + y; |y|]$.
Also note the same is true for $x$. That is, $x$ and $z$ lie in both spheres. Let's suppose they're different points. Since they both lie in $S[0; |x|]$, it follows from the convexity of the ball that $frac{x + z}{2}$ must lie in the open ball $B(0; |x|)$, which is to say $left|frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x|$. On the same token, we have $frac{x + z}{2} in B(x + y, |y|)$. Hence,
$$|x + y| le left|frac{x + z}{2}right| + left|x + y - frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x| + |y| = |x + y|,$$
which is a contradiction. Thus, $x = z$, and from this it's easy to see that $x$ and $y$ are parallel.
As for your other question, you can form a norm from a unit ball. The eligible unit balls are precisely the non-empty symmetric, closed, bounded, convex subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$. This gives you a lot of scope to find norms that are strict or non-strict.
$endgroup$
Suppose $V$'s unit sphere contains no line segments, and $x, y in V$ such that
$$|x + y| = |x| + |y|.$$
Let $z$ be the point on the line segment $[0, x + y]$ that you would expect to be distance $|x|$ from $0$ and distance $|y|$ from $x + y$. Working this out, you'll get
$$z = frac{|x|(x + y)}{|x + y|}.$$
Note that $z$ lies on the spheres $S[0; |x|]$ and $S[x + y; |y|]$.
Also note the same is true for $x$. That is, $x$ and $z$ lie in both spheres. Let's suppose they're different points. Since they both lie in $S[0; |x|]$, it follows from the convexity of the ball that $frac{x + z}{2}$ must lie in the open ball $B(0; |x|)$, which is to say $left|frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x|$. On the same token, we have $frac{x + z}{2} in B(x + y, |y|)$. Hence,
$$|x + y| le left|frac{x + z}{2}right| + left|x + y - frac{x + z}{2}right| < |x| + |y| = |x + y|,$$
which is a contradiction. Thus, $x = z$, and from this it's easy to see that $x$ and $y$ are parallel.
As for your other question, you can form a norm from a unit ball. The eligible unit balls are precisely the non-empty symmetric, closed, bounded, convex subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$. This gives you a lot of scope to find norms that are strict or non-strict.
answered Jan 5 at 2:56
Theo BenditTheo Bendit
17.3k12149
17.3k12149
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062340%2fproblem-about-strictly-normed-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The idea is to express some scalar multiple of $x+y$ as a convex combination of $x/|x|$ and $y/|y|$, and since the sphere has no segments conclude that the norm of that multiple is strictly less than $1$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 2:48
$begingroup$
@MikeEarnest I had a similar idea, but it was not enough (for me). I'll write it.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Jan 5 at 2:52
1
$begingroup$
Your work was correct, you just had to choose $lambda$ so that $|x+y|$ somehow entered the picture. It turns out the correct choice is $lambda=|x|/(|x|+|y|)$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 3:01
$begingroup$
Also, the $L_1$ norm is not strict.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
Jan 5 at 15:34