Effect of perturbation on eigenvalues












2












$begingroup$


Given a diagonal matrix $A$ with diagonal elements $a_1,dotsc,a_n$ what can we say about the eigenvalues of the perturbation $A+E(t)$ satisfying $E(t) = O(t^k)$ so that there exists a constant $K>0$ so that $|E(t)|leq Kt^k$.



Now the determinant of $det(A+E(t)-zeta I)$ is a sum of the form



$$p(zeta) = sum_j left(prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))O(t^{kcdot l_j})right)$$



where $pi_j$ denotes permutations on ${1,dotsc,n}$.




I would like to say that the roots of $p$ with respect to $zeta$,
here denoted $(b_i)_{i=1}^{n}$, should satisfy



$$|a_{i}-b_i| = O(t^k)$$



however I don't know how to prove this or if it is true?




By expanding the product $prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))$ into a sum of the form



$$sum prod(a_{tilde{pi}(i)}-zeta)O(t^{k tilde{l}_j})$$



i get an even bigger sum and this does not seem to help me at all so I am kind of stuck at this point.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is what I meant
    $endgroup$
    – Olof Rubin
    Jan 16 at 18:03










  • $begingroup$
    If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 23:54
















2












$begingroup$


Given a diagonal matrix $A$ with diagonal elements $a_1,dotsc,a_n$ what can we say about the eigenvalues of the perturbation $A+E(t)$ satisfying $E(t) = O(t^k)$ so that there exists a constant $K>0$ so that $|E(t)|leq Kt^k$.



Now the determinant of $det(A+E(t)-zeta I)$ is a sum of the form



$$p(zeta) = sum_j left(prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))O(t^{kcdot l_j})right)$$



where $pi_j$ denotes permutations on ${1,dotsc,n}$.




I would like to say that the roots of $p$ with respect to $zeta$,
here denoted $(b_i)_{i=1}^{n}$, should satisfy



$$|a_{i}-b_i| = O(t^k)$$



however I don't know how to prove this or if it is true?




By expanding the product $prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))$ into a sum of the form



$$sum prod(a_{tilde{pi}(i)}-zeta)O(t^{k tilde{l}_j})$$



i get an even bigger sum and this does not seem to help me at all so I am kind of stuck at this point.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is what I meant
    $endgroup$
    – Olof Rubin
    Jan 16 at 18:03










  • $begingroup$
    If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 23:54














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Given a diagonal matrix $A$ with diagonal elements $a_1,dotsc,a_n$ what can we say about the eigenvalues of the perturbation $A+E(t)$ satisfying $E(t) = O(t^k)$ so that there exists a constant $K>0$ so that $|E(t)|leq Kt^k$.



Now the determinant of $det(A+E(t)-zeta I)$ is a sum of the form



$$p(zeta) = sum_j left(prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))O(t^{kcdot l_j})right)$$



where $pi_j$ denotes permutations on ${1,dotsc,n}$.




I would like to say that the roots of $p$ with respect to $zeta$,
here denoted $(b_i)_{i=1}^{n}$, should satisfy



$$|a_{i}-b_i| = O(t^k)$$



however I don't know how to prove this or if it is true?




By expanding the product $prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))$ into a sum of the form



$$sum prod(a_{tilde{pi}(i)}-zeta)O(t^{k tilde{l}_j})$$



i get an even bigger sum and this does not seem to help me at all so I am kind of stuck at this point.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Given a diagonal matrix $A$ with diagonal elements $a_1,dotsc,a_n$ what can we say about the eigenvalues of the perturbation $A+E(t)$ satisfying $E(t) = O(t^k)$ so that there exists a constant $K>0$ so that $|E(t)|leq Kt^k$.



Now the determinant of $det(A+E(t)-zeta I)$ is a sum of the form



$$p(zeta) = sum_j left(prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))O(t^{kcdot l_j})right)$$



where $pi_j$ denotes permutations on ${1,dotsc,n}$.




I would like to say that the roots of $p$ with respect to $zeta$,
here denoted $(b_i)_{i=1}^{n}$, should satisfy



$$|a_{i}-b_i| = O(t^k)$$



however I don't know how to prove this or if it is true?




By expanding the product $prod_{i=l_j}^{n}(a_{pi_j(i)}-zeta+O(t^k))$ into a sum of the form



$$sum prod(a_{tilde{pi}(i)}-zeta)O(t^{k tilde{l}_j})$$



i get an even bigger sum and this does not seem to help me at all so I am kind of stuck at this point.







eigenvalues-eigenvectors perturbation-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 16 at 10:45









Olof RubinOlof Rubin

1,160316




1,160316












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is what I meant
    $endgroup$
    – Olof Rubin
    Jan 16 at 18:03










  • $begingroup$
    If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 23:54


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 18:02










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is what I meant
    $endgroup$
    – Olof Rubin
    Jan 16 at 18:03










  • $begingroup$
    If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Keith McClary
    Jan 16 at 23:54
















$begingroup$
Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Jan 16 at 18:02




$begingroup$
Do you mean $O(t^k)$ as $t to 0$ ?
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Jan 16 at 18:02












$begingroup$
Yes that is what I meant
$endgroup$
– Olof Rubin
Jan 16 at 18:03




$begingroup$
Yes that is what I meant
$endgroup$
– Olof Rubin
Jan 16 at 18:03












$begingroup$
If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Jan 16 at 23:54




$begingroup$
If we take $F(t)= E(t^frac{1}{k})$, doesn't this reduce to the $k=1$ problem for $A+F(t)$ ?
$endgroup$
– Keith McClary
Jan 16 at 23:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Here are a couple hints. I'll come back and fill in more details once you've had a chance to look at them.



A necessary condition for $ Vert E(t) Vert = mathcal{O}(t^k) $ as $tto0$ is that each entry also goes to zero like $t^k$.



Gershgorin's circle theorem says that all eigenvalues are contained within the union of disks centered at the diagonal elements of a matrix, where each disk has radius equal to the sum of magnitude of the off diagonal elements in the corresponding row. What can you tell about the row sums and diagonal elements of $A+E(t)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075584%2feffect-of-perturbation-on-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Here are a couple hints. I'll come back and fill in more details once you've had a chance to look at them.



    A necessary condition for $ Vert E(t) Vert = mathcal{O}(t^k) $ as $tto0$ is that each entry also goes to zero like $t^k$.



    Gershgorin's circle theorem says that all eigenvalues are contained within the union of disks centered at the diagonal elements of a matrix, where each disk has radius equal to the sum of magnitude of the off diagonal elements in the corresponding row. What can you tell about the row sums and diagonal elements of $A+E(t)$?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Here are a couple hints. I'll come back and fill in more details once you've had a chance to look at them.



      A necessary condition for $ Vert E(t) Vert = mathcal{O}(t^k) $ as $tto0$ is that each entry also goes to zero like $t^k$.



      Gershgorin's circle theorem says that all eigenvalues are contained within the union of disks centered at the diagonal elements of a matrix, where each disk has radius equal to the sum of magnitude of the off diagonal elements in the corresponding row. What can you tell about the row sums and diagonal elements of $A+E(t)$?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Here are a couple hints. I'll come back and fill in more details once you've had a chance to look at them.



        A necessary condition for $ Vert E(t) Vert = mathcal{O}(t^k) $ as $tto0$ is that each entry also goes to zero like $t^k$.



        Gershgorin's circle theorem says that all eigenvalues are contained within the union of disks centered at the diagonal elements of a matrix, where each disk has radius equal to the sum of magnitude of the off diagonal elements in the corresponding row. What can you tell about the row sums and diagonal elements of $A+E(t)$?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here are a couple hints. I'll come back and fill in more details once you've had a chance to look at them.



        A necessary condition for $ Vert E(t) Vert = mathcal{O}(t^k) $ as $tto0$ is that each entry also goes to zero like $t^k$.



        Gershgorin's circle theorem says that all eigenvalues are contained within the union of disks centered at the diagonal elements of a matrix, where each disk has radius equal to the sum of magnitude of the off diagonal elements in the corresponding row. What can you tell about the row sums and diagonal elements of $A+E(t)$?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 2:20









        tchtch

        803310




        803310






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075584%2feffect-of-perturbation-on-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith