Lower bound for sum of Hecke eigenvalues
Let $lambda$ be weakly multiplicative, $lambda(n)geq0$, $p$ prime and $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(frac{x}{n})$ for real $x$.
How can I show $S(x)gg left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}lambda(p)right)^2-left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}1right)$?
Here is the background:
The question is coming from IKS, section 3. $lambda(n)$ are the eigenvalues of a newform $f$ of level $N$. All above sums are chosen such that $(n,N)=1$ or $pnotmid N$, thus giving multiplicativity.
In Xu, section 3.1 something similar happens. Here the hints $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$ (which leads to $lambda(p)geq1$ and $|lambda(n)|leqsigma_0(n)$ (divisor function) are given.
number-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors estimation modular-forms upper-lower-bounds
add a comment |
Let $lambda$ be weakly multiplicative, $lambda(n)geq0$, $p$ prime and $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(frac{x}{n})$ for real $x$.
How can I show $S(x)gg left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}lambda(p)right)^2-left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}1right)$?
Here is the background:
The question is coming from IKS, section 3. $lambda(n)$ are the eigenvalues of a newform $f$ of level $N$. All above sums are chosen such that $(n,N)=1$ or $pnotmid N$, thus giving multiplicativity.
In Xu, section 3.1 something similar happens. Here the hints $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$ (which leads to $lambda(p)geq1$ and $|lambda(n)|leqsigma_0(n)$ (divisor function) are given.
number-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors estimation modular-forms upper-lower-bounds
add a comment |
Let $lambda$ be weakly multiplicative, $lambda(n)geq0$, $p$ prime and $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(frac{x}{n})$ for real $x$.
How can I show $S(x)gg left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}lambda(p)right)^2-left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}1right)$?
Here is the background:
The question is coming from IKS, section 3. $lambda(n)$ are the eigenvalues of a newform $f$ of level $N$. All above sums are chosen such that $(n,N)=1$ or $pnotmid N$, thus giving multiplicativity.
In Xu, section 3.1 something similar happens. Here the hints $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$ (which leads to $lambda(p)geq1$ and $|lambda(n)|leqsigma_0(n)$ (divisor function) are given.
number-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors estimation modular-forms upper-lower-bounds
Let $lambda$ be weakly multiplicative, $lambda(n)geq0$, $p$ prime and $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(frac{x}{n})$ for real $x$.
How can I show $S(x)gg left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}lambda(p)right)^2-left(sum_{pleq sqrt{x/3}}1right)$?
Here is the background:
The question is coming from IKS, section 3. $lambda(n)$ are the eigenvalues of a newform $f$ of level $N$. All above sums are chosen such that $(n,N)=1$ or $pnotmid N$, thus giving multiplicativity.
In Xu, section 3.1 something similar happens. Here the hints $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$ (which leads to $lambda(p)geq1$ and $|lambda(n)|leqsigma_0(n)$ (divisor function) are given.
number-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors estimation modular-forms upper-lower-bounds
number-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors estimation modular-forms upper-lower-bounds
edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:14
asked Nov 12 '18 at 13:17


Nodt Greenish
29813
29813
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I found a way which should do the trick. I think the division by 3 is just a technical detail and 2 would be already sufficient to pull $log(frac{x}{x/2})$ out of the sum. You can take $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(x/n)geq sum_{pqleq x/2}lambda(pq)$. Furthermore we use the formula $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$, which is (1.2) in IKS., to estimate the case $p=q$. That's where the subtracted sum of 1's comes from.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995298%2flower-bound-for-sum-of-hecke-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I found a way which should do the trick. I think the division by 3 is just a technical detail and 2 would be already sufficient to pull $log(frac{x}{x/2})$ out of the sum. You can take $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(x/n)geq sum_{pqleq x/2}lambda(pq)$. Furthermore we use the formula $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$, which is (1.2) in IKS., to estimate the case $p=q$. That's where the subtracted sum of 1's comes from.
add a comment |
I found a way which should do the trick. I think the division by 3 is just a technical detail and 2 would be already sufficient to pull $log(frac{x}{x/2})$ out of the sum. You can take $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(x/n)geq sum_{pqleq x/2}lambda(pq)$. Furthermore we use the formula $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$, which is (1.2) in IKS., to estimate the case $p=q$. That's where the subtracted sum of 1's comes from.
add a comment |
I found a way which should do the trick. I think the division by 3 is just a technical detail and 2 would be already sufficient to pull $log(frac{x}{x/2})$ out of the sum. You can take $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(x/n)geq sum_{pqleq x/2}lambda(pq)$. Furthermore we use the formula $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$, which is (1.2) in IKS., to estimate the case $p=q$. That's where the subtracted sum of 1's comes from.
I found a way which should do the trick. I think the division by 3 is just a technical detail and 2 would be already sufficient to pull $log(frac{x}{x/2})$ out of the sum. You can take $S(x)=sum_{nleq x}lambda(n)log(x/n)geq sum_{pqleq x/2}lambda(pq)$. Furthermore we use the formula $lambda(p)^2=lambda(p^2)+1$, which is (1.2) in IKS., to estimate the case $p=q$. That's where the subtracted sum of 1's comes from.
edited Nov 22 '18 at 8:40
answered Nov 20 '18 at 14:12


Nodt Greenish
29813
29813
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995298%2flower-bound-for-sum-of-hecke-eigenvalues%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown