Does $|f^prime|<1$ imply that $forall_{x,y}|f(x)-f(y)|<|x-y|$?
$begingroup$
I have a task that I think reduces to proving that $f$ is a contraction mapping. We know that $forall_x|f^prime(x)|<1$. Therefore if I could prove that $|f^prime|<1implies|f(x)-f(y)|<|x-y|$ then I think the task would be solved.
I feel this property does hold and that it is also somewhat obvious. Unfortunately, saying that something is obvious is obviously not a valid proof.
I have feeling proving this belongs to an elementary course on analysis, but it is somehow surprising how much have I forgotten from this course... How to prove this property and does it even hold?
real-analysis derivatives norm
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a task that I think reduces to proving that $f$ is a contraction mapping. We know that $forall_x|f^prime(x)|<1$. Therefore if I could prove that $|f^prime|<1implies|f(x)-f(y)|<|x-y|$ then I think the task would be solved.
I feel this property does hold and that it is also somewhat obvious. Unfortunately, saying that something is obvious is obviously not a valid proof.
I have feeling proving this belongs to an elementary course on analysis, but it is somehow surprising how much have I forgotten from this course... How to prove this property and does it even hold?
real-analysis derivatives norm
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
1
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I have a task that I think reduces to proving that $f$ is a contraction mapping. We know that $forall_x|f^prime(x)|<1$. Therefore if I could prove that $|f^prime|<1implies|f(x)-f(y)|<|x-y|$ then I think the task would be solved.
I feel this property does hold and that it is also somewhat obvious. Unfortunately, saying that something is obvious is obviously not a valid proof.
I have feeling proving this belongs to an elementary course on analysis, but it is somehow surprising how much have I forgotten from this course... How to prove this property and does it even hold?
real-analysis derivatives norm
$endgroup$
I have a task that I think reduces to proving that $f$ is a contraction mapping. We know that $forall_x|f^prime(x)|<1$. Therefore if I could prove that $|f^prime|<1implies|f(x)-f(y)|<|x-y|$ then I think the task would be solved.
I feel this property does hold and that it is also somewhat obvious. Unfortunately, saying that something is obvious is obviously not a valid proof.
I have feeling proving this belongs to an elementary course on analysis, but it is somehow surprising how much have I forgotten from this course... How to prove this property and does it even hold?
real-analysis derivatives norm
real-analysis derivatives norm
asked Jan 21 at 19:04
gaazkamgaazkam
456314
456314
1
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
1
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
1
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17
1
1
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
3
3
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
1
1
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose that $|f'(x)|<1 ~forall x in (a,b).$
SIMPLER PROOF (thanks to BigbearZzz)
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$.
By the mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$f'(c) = frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} Rightarrow \
f(x)-f(y) = (x-y)f'(c) Rightarrow\
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
OLD PROOF
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$. Moreover, consider the function $g(x) = x$ (continuous and differentiable everywhere).
By the Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$left(f(x)-f(y)right)g'(c) = left(g(x)-g(y)right)f'(c) Rightarrow\
left(f(x)-f(y)right) = left(x-yright)f'(c) Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a guess as to what your final problem is. Draw a careful graph of
$$ frac{3x + sqrt{1+x^2 ;}}{4} $$
It has no fixpoint.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082262%2fdoes-f-prime1-imply-that-forall-x-yfx-fyx-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose that $|f'(x)|<1 ~forall x in (a,b).$
SIMPLER PROOF (thanks to BigbearZzz)
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$.
By the mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$f'(c) = frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} Rightarrow \
f(x)-f(y) = (x-y)f'(c) Rightarrow\
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
OLD PROOF
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$. Moreover, consider the function $g(x) = x$ (continuous and differentiable everywhere).
By the Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$left(f(x)-f(y)right)g'(c) = left(g(x)-g(y)right)f'(c) Rightarrow\
left(f(x)-f(y)right) = left(x-yright)f'(c) Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $|f'(x)|<1 ~forall x in (a,b).$
SIMPLER PROOF (thanks to BigbearZzz)
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$.
By the mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$f'(c) = frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} Rightarrow \
f(x)-f(y) = (x-y)f'(c) Rightarrow\
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
OLD PROOF
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$. Moreover, consider the function $g(x) = x$ (continuous and differentiable everywhere).
By the Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$left(f(x)-f(y)right)g'(c) = left(g(x)-g(y)right)f'(c) Rightarrow\
left(f(x)-f(y)right) = left(x-yright)f'(c) Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that $|f'(x)|<1 ~forall x in (a,b).$
SIMPLER PROOF (thanks to BigbearZzz)
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$.
By the mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$f'(c) = frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} Rightarrow \
f(x)-f(y) = (x-y)f'(c) Rightarrow\
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
OLD PROOF
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$. Moreover, consider the function $g(x) = x$ (continuous and differentiable everywhere).
By the Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$left(f(x)-f(y)right)g'(c) = left(g(x)-g(y)right)f'(c) Rightarrow\
left(f(x)-f(y)right) = left(x-yright)f'(c) Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
$endgroup$
Suppose that $|f'(x)|<1 ~forall x in (a,b).$
SIMPLER PROOF (thanks to BigbearZzz)
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$.
By the mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$f'(c) = frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} Rightarrow \
f(x)-f(y) = (x-y)f'(c) Rightarrow\
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
OLD PROOF
Consider $y<xin [a, b]$. Moreover, consider the function $g(x) = x$ (continuous and differentiable everywhere).
By the Cauchy's mean value theorem, there exists a number $c in (y,x)$:
$$left(f(x)-f(y)right)g'(c) = left(g(x)-g(y)right)f'(c) Rightarrow\
left(f(x)-f(y)right) = left(x-yright)f'(c) Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)|.$$
Since $|f'(c)| <1 $, then:
$$|f(x)-f(y)| = |x-y||f'(c)| < |x-y| Rightarrow \
|f(x)-f(y)| < |x-y|.$$
edited Jan 21 at 20:42
answered Jan 21 at 19:17


the_candymanthe_candyman
8,97832145
8,97832145
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
I wonder why you need to use Cauchy MVT when the normal MVT works just fine?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 21 at 20:28
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz you're right! I think I used it because yesterday I was following a seminar about the mathematical heritage of Cauchy. I'm going to fix it.
$endgroup$
– the_candyman
Jan 21 at 20:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a guess as to what your final problem is. Draw a careful graph of
$$ frac{3x + sqrt{1+x^2 ;}}{4} $$
It has no fixpoint.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a guess as to what your final problem is. Draw a careful graph of
$$ frac{3x + sqrt{1+x^2 ;}}{4} $$
It has no fixpoint.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am making a guess as to what your final problem is. Draw a careful graph of
$$ frac{3x + sqrt{1+x^2 ;}}{4} $$
It has no fixpoint.
$endgroup$
I am making a guess as to what your final problem is. Draw a careful graph of
$$ frac{3x + sqrt{1+x^2 ;}}{4} $$
It has no fixpoint.
answered Jan 21 at 19:31
Will JagyWill Jagy
104k5102201
104k5102201
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
Ugh. Is this function a counter-example to my property? If it wasn't, then from Banach fixed-point theorem it would have to have a fixpoint.
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
$begingroup$
@gaazkam your question has a correct answer already. The warning I am making is for non-compact metric spaces. We may then have $d(f(x), f(y)) < d(x,y)$ while still failing to have fixpoints for $f$ There is yet more that could be said...
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 21 at 19:57
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082262%2fdoes-f-prime1-imply-that-forall-x-yfx-fyx-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Maybe using the mean value theorem helps?
$endgroup$
– Shashi
Jan 21 at 19:07
$begingroup$
What about $f: Bbb R setminus { 0 } to Bbb R$, $f(x) = x/|x|$ ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:07
3
$begingroup$
Ans what about $x=y$?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 21 at 19:09
$begingroup$
@MartinR Is this supposed to be a counterexample? In each interval on which $f$ is continuous my property holds. Let $x,y>0,xneq y$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|=0$ but $|x-y|>0$
$endgroup$
– gaazkam
Jan 21 at 19:11
1
$begingroup$
@gaazkam: Exactly. So stating where $f$ is defined should be the first step.
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Jan 21 at 19:17