Mixing
Getting 'java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found' error on running javafx application with java11
2
We recently migrated from java 8 to openJdk11. Now I am trying to test my application on windows and ubuntu with using openJdk installed on both OS. I'm able to run it on ubuntu. But same is not executing in windows10 with java11.Error_Message:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
at com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:267)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:158)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication1(LauncherImpl.java:678)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.lambda$launchApplication$2(LauncherImpl.java:195)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
windows-10 runtimeexception java-11 javafx-11
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
add a comment |
2
We recently migrated from java 8 to openJdk11. Now I am trying to test my application on windows and ubuntu with using openJdk installed on both OS. I'm able to run it on ubuntu. But same is not executing in windows10 with java11.Error_Message:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
at com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:267)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:158)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication1(LauncherImpl.java:678)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.lambda$launchApplication$2(LauncherImpl.java:195)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
windows-10 runtimeexception java-11 javafx-11
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, likejavafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (viajlinkorjpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28
add a comment |
2
2
2
We recently migrated from java 8 to openJdk11. Now I am trying to test my application on windows and ubuntu with using openJdk installed on both OS. I'm able to run it on ubuntu. But same is not executing in windows10 with java11.Error_Message:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
at com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:267)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:158)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication1(LauncherImpl.java:678)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.lambda$launchApplication$2(LauncherImpl.java:195)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
windows-10 runtimeexception java-11 javafx-11
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
We recently migrated from java 8 to openJdk11. Now I am trying to test my application on windows and ubuntu with using openJdk installed on both OS. I'm able to run it on ubuntu. But same is not executing in windows10 with java11.Error_Message:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No toolkit found
at com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.getToolkit(Toolkit.java:272)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:267)
at com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.startup(PlatformImpl.java:158)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.startToolkit(LauncherImpl.java:658)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.launchApplication1(LauncherImpl.java:678)
at com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.lambda$launchApplication$2(LauncherImpl.java:195)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
windows-10 runtimeexception java-11 javafx-11
windows-10 runtimeexception java-11 javafx-11
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
edited Jan 2 at 9:25
Dominique
2,08741941
2,08741941
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
asked Jan 1 at 9:52
anupmanupm
114
114
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, likejavafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (viajlinkorjpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28
add a comment |
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, likejavafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (viajlinkorjpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, like
javafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (via jlink or jpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, like
javafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (via jlink or jpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
0
It is possible that JDK, which you have installed on your Windows system, doesn't include JavaFX and you should install it externally.
Read more here:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
or
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19529820
or
Javafx: No toolkit found exception
.
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53994490%2fgetting-java-lang-runtimeexception-no-toolkit-found-error-on-running-javafx-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
0
It is possible that JDK, which you have installed on your Windows system, doesn't include JavaFX and you should install it externally.
Read more here:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
or
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19529820
or
Javafx: No toolkit found exception
.
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
add a comment |
0
It is possible that JDK, which you have installed on your Windows system, doesn't include JavaFX and you should install it externally.
Read more here:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
or
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19529820
or
Javafx: No toolkit found exception
.
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
add a comment |
0
0
0
It is possible that JDK, which you have installed on your Windows system, doesn't include JavaFX and you should install it externally.
Read more here:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
or
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19529820
or
Javafx: No toolkit found exception
.
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
It is possible that JDK, which you have installed on your Windows system, doesn't include JavaFX and you should install it externally.
Read more here:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
or
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19529820
or
Javafx: No toolkit found exception
.
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
answered Jan 1 at 10:26
jsosnowskijsosnowski
89911341
89911341
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
add a comment |
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
My application runs on ubuntu 18 with no error. I have all javafx*.jar files in my classpath. If it runs on ubuntu with same configuration why not here? Do i have to do extra configuration for windows? I downloaded JavaFX sdk using the link you provided above. Could you please tell me how to configure this path?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 6:18
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53994490%2fgetting-java-lang-runtimeexception-no-toolkit-found-error-on-running-javafx-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Edit your question and post how you run your app, your command line options, and your JDK/JavaFX SDK versions, so we can help you.
– José Pereda
Jan 1 at 12:48
Okay. So i have a question. I'm now able to run JavaFX on windows. You know problem was with the JavaFX jar renaming!!. Actually I was building my project on linux and i see that there were 2 jars of each category. one is javafx-base-11.jar and another one javafx-base-11-linux.jar . When i copied these jars to my classpath in windows it was not taking these jars. So i tried to build my project in windows and there i found jars appended with -winn.jar. So my doubt is how it is like that/ These jars are completely different? If i rename -linux with -win it will not work.
– anupm
Jan 2 at 9:35
Each platform has different jars, with the proper native libraries (.so for linux, .dll for windows), so you can't use one jar on a different platform. You have to use a different JavaFX SDK and you have to distribute a different solution for each platform. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs
– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 9:41
So you are telling that javaFX jars are now platform dependent? Then how we will achieve platform independent?? If i build my application in windows then I cannot run it on linux and vice-versa. Isn't it bad? I compared 2 jars (javafx-graphics-11-win.jar and javafx-graphics-11-linux.jar) files and found that these 2 are different. Is there any other approach to use graphics jar from other 3rd party libraries?
– anupm
Jan 2 at 11:41
Exactly, JavaFX jars are platform dependent, because some of them bundle native libraries for the given platform, like
javafx-graphics-11-<platform>.jar. You can do distribution for each platform (viajlinkorjpackage), at the end you rely on a VM that is specific of that platform. However, you can still do a fat jar bundling all the jars and native libraries into one. See openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#modular (section non-modular project).– José Pereda
Jan 2 at 13:28