Why circle of curvature is defined to be in the inside part of the circle?
$begingroup$
We know that for a curve at a certain point,its circle of curvature is defined to be a circle whose curvature is same as the curve at that point and both the curve and the circle has same tangent at that point.But i couldn't understand why is the circle of curvature is defined to be always in the inside part of the curve? If the circle is on the outside part of the circle(convex part), it still holds the above two criteria? Can anyone clarify my doubt?
calculus multivariable-calculus curvature
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that for a curve at a certain point,its circle of curvature is defined to be a circle whose curvature is same as the curve at that point and both the curve and the circle has same tangent at that point.But i couldn't understand why is the circle of curvature is defined to be always in the inside part of the curve? If the circle is on the outside part of the circle(convex part), it still holds the above two criteria? Can anyone clarify my doubt?
calculus multivariable-calculus curvature
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that for a curve at a certain point,its circle of curvature is defined to be a circle whose curvature is same as the curve at that point and both the curve and the circle has same tangent at that point.But i couldn't understand why is the circle of curvature is defined to be always in the inside part of the curve? If the circle is on the outside part of the circle(convex part), it still holds the above two criteria? Can anyone clarify my doubt?
calculus multivariable-calculus curvature
$endgroup$
We know that for a curve at a certain point,its circle of curvature is defined to be a circle whose curvature is same as the curve at that point and both the curve and the circle has same tangent at that point.But i couldn't understand why is the circle of curvature is defined to be always in the inside part of the curve? If the circle is on the outside part of the circle(convex part), it still holds the above two criteria? Can anyone clarify my doubt?
calculus multivariable-calculus curvature
calculus multivariable-calculus curvature
asked Jan 26 at 6:51
Soumyajit DebSoumyajit Deb
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your definition is incomplete. The osculating circle has its center at the intersection of infinitesimally close normals drawn at points on both sides of the given point, and the normals intersect on the inside. Yet another way to define the osculating circle is by taking two more points on the curve on either side of the given point and consider the limit position of the (unique) circle through the three of them. In this way you obviously get a circle on the inside of the curve.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087969%2fwhy-circle-of-curvature-is-defined-to-be-in-the-inside-part-of-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your definition is incomplete. The osculating circle has its center at the intersection of infinitesimally close normals drawn at points on both sides of the given point, and the normals intersect on the inside. Yet another way to define the osculating circle is by taking two more points on the curve on either side of the given point and consider the limit position of the (unique) circle through the three of them. In this way you obviously get a circle on the inside of the curve.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition is incomplete. The osculating circle has its center at the intersection of infinitesimally close normals drawn at points on both sides of the given point, and the normals intersect on the inside. Yet another way to define the osculating circle is by taking two more points on the curve on either side of the given point and consider the limit position of the (unique) circle through the three of them. In this way you obviously get a circle on the inside of the curve.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your definition is incomplete. The osculating circle has its center at the intersection of infinitesimally close normals drawn at points on both sides of the given point, and the normals intersect on the inside. Yet another way to define the osculating circle is by taking two more points on the curve on either side of the given point and consider the limit position of the (unique) circle through the three of them. In this way you obviously get a circle on the inside of the curve.
$endgroup$
Your definition is incomplete. The osculating circle has its center at the intersection of infinitesimally close normals drawn at points on both sides of the given point, and the normals intersect on the inside. Yet another way to define the osculating circle is by taking two more points on the curve on either side of the given point and consider the limit position of the (unique) circle through the three of them. In this way you obviously get a circle on the inside of the curve.
answered Jan 26 at 7:15
GReyesGReyes
2,22315
2,22315
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
$begingroup$
what you said is true but can you clarify it more?
$endgroup$
– Soumyajit Deb
Jan 26 at 9:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087969%2fwhy-circle-of-curvature-is-defined-to-be-in-the-inside-part-of-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
