Linear Operators and Eigenvalue












2












$begingroup$


Let $V$ be an n-dimensional vector space and define the operators $T, space G:Vrightarrow V$ over an arbitrary field $mathbb{F}$, with char($mathbb{F})=0$. Suppose that $T^n=0$, $text{null}(T) = 1$, and $GT- TG = T.$
Prove that the eigenvalues of $G$ are of the form $alpha,$ $alpha -1, alpha-2, ..., alpha-n$, for some $alpha in mathbb{F}$.



My attempt:



By assumption, $text{null}(T)=1$, so there exists a nonzero vector $v in text{ker}(T)$. Clearly,
$0= T(v)=(GT- TG)(v) Rightarrow T(G(v))=0 Rightarrow G(v) in text{ker}(T)$ which implies that $text{ker}(T)$ is $G$-invariant.



Let $u$ be an eigenvector of $G$, then $G(u) = lambda u$ for some $lambda in mathbb{F}$ and we have that $(GT - TG)(u) = T(u) Rightarrow G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)$.



Therefore, if $u$ is eigenvector of $G$, with an eigenvalue $lambda$, then $T(u)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $(lambda+1)$.



But I don't know what I will do with this..










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Feb 2 at 19:31


















2












$begingroup$


Let $V$ be an n-dimensional vector space and define the operators $T, space G:Vrightarrow V$ over an arbitrary field $mathbb{F}$, with char($mathbb{F})=0$. Suppose that $T^n=0$, $text{null}(T) = 1$, and $GT- TG = T.$
Prove that the eigenvalues of $G$ are of the form $alpha,$ $alpha -1, alpha-2, ..., alpha-n$, for some $alpha in mathbb{F}$.



My attempt:



By assumption, $text{null}(T)=1$, so there exists a nonzero vector $v in text{ker}(T)$. Clearly,
$0= T(v)=(GT- TG)(v) Rightarrow T(G(v))=0 Rightarrow G(v) in text{ker}(T)$ which implies that $text{ker}(T)$ is $G$-invariant.



Let $u$ be an eigenvector of $G$, then $G(u) = lambda u$ for some $lambda in mathbb{F}$ and we have that $(GT - TG)(u) = T(u) Rightarrow G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)$.



Therefore, if $u$ is eigenvector of $G$, with an eigenvalue $lambda$, then $T(u)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $(lambda+1)$.



But I don't know what I will do with this..










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Feb 2 at 19:31
















2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Let $V$ be an n-dimensional vector space and define the operators $T, space G:Vrightarrow V$ over an arbitrary field $mathbb{F}$, with char($mathbb{F})=0$. Suppose that $T^n=0$, $text{null}(T) = 1$, and $GT- TG = T.$
Prove that the eigenvalues of $G$ are of the form $alpha,$ $alpha -1, alpha-2, ..., alpha-n$, for some $alpha in mathbb{F}$.



My attempt:



By assumption, $text{null}(T)=1$, so there exists a nonzero vector $v in text{ker}(T)$. Clearly,
$0= T(v)=(GT- TG)(v) Rightarrow T(G(v))=0 Rightarrow G(v) in text{ker}(T)$ which implies that $text{ker}(T)$ is $G$-invariant.



Let $u$ be an eigenvector of $G$, then $G(u) = lambda u$ for some $lambda in mathbb{F}$ and we have that $(GT - TG)(u) = T(u) Rightarrow G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)$.



Therefore, if $u$ is eigenvector of $G$, with an eigenvalue $lambda$, then $T(u)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $(lambda+1)$.



But I don't know what I will do with this..










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $V$ be an n-dimensional vector space and define the operators $T, space G:Vrightarrow V$ over an arbitrary field $mathbb{F}$, with char($mathbb{F})=0$. Suppose that $T^n=0$, $text{null}(T) = 1$, and $GT- TG = T.$
Prove that the eigenvalues of $G$ are of the form $alpha,$ $alpha -1, alpha-2, ..., alpha-n$, for some $alpha in mathbb{F}$.



My attempt:



By assumption, $text{null}(T)=1$, so there exists a nonzero vector $v in text{ker}(T)$. Clearly,
$0= T(v)=(GT- TG)(v) Rightarrow T(G(v))=0 Rightarrow G(v) in text{ker}(T)$ which implies that $text{ker}(T)$ is $G$-invariant.



Let $u$ be an eigenvector of $G$, then $G(u) = lambda u$ for some $lambda in mathbb{F}$ and we have that $(GT - TG)(u) = T(u) Rightarrow G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)$.



Therefore, if $u$ is eigenvector of $G$, with an eigenvalue $lambda$, then $T(u)$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $(lambda+1)$.



But I don't know what I will do with this..







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 2 at 19:12









Victoria M

42618




42618










asked Feb 2 at 18:57









user638057user638057

998




998








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Feb 2 at 19:31
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Feb 2 at 19:31










1




1




$begingroup$
Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Feb 2 at 19:31






$begingroup$
Almost an engaging problem--I say almost because something ain't quite right, to wit: $dim_F V = n$, but the alleged eigenvalues of $G$, $alpha$, $alpha - 1$, $alpha - 2$, $ldots$, $alpha - n$ are $n + 1$ in number; but an operator on an $n$ dimensional vector space has at most $n$ eigenvalues. Somethings gotta give, but what? Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Feb 2 at 19:31












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Hint: You're nearly there. Slight correction: suppose that $u$ is an eigenvector of $G$ with eigenvalue $lambda$. Then, as you calculated, we find that
$$
G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)
$$

That is, we have two possibilities: either $T(u)$ is an eigenvector of $G$ associated with $lambda+1$ or $T(u) = 0$, which is to say that $T(u) in ker G$. Because $operatorname{null}(T) = 1$, we can deduce that $T(u) = 0$ will happen for exactly one eigenvector of $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Feb 2 at 21:51












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097651%2flinear-operators-and-eigenvalue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Hint: You're nearly there. Slight correction: suppose that $u$ is an eigenvector of $G$ with eigenvalue $lambda$. Then, as you calculated, we find that
$$
G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)
$$

That is, we have two possibilities: either $T(u)$ is an eigenvector of $G$ associated with $lambda+1$ or $T(u) = 0$, which is to say that $T(u) in ker G$. Because $operatorname{null}(T) = 1$, we can deduce that $T(u) = 0$ will happen for exactly one eigenvector of $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Feb 2 at 21:51
















0












$begingroup$

Hint: You're nearly there. Slight correction: suppose that $u$ is an eigenvector of $G$ with eigenvalue $lambda$. Then, as you calculated, we find that
$$
G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)
$$

That is, we have two possibilities: either $T(u)$ is an eigenvector of $G$ associated with $lambda+1$ or $T(u) = 0$, which is to say that $T(u) in ker G$. Because $operatorname{null}(T) = 1$, we can deduce that $T(u) = 0$ will happen for exactly one eigenvector of $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Feb 2 at 21:51














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Hint: You're nearly there. Slight correction: suppose that $u$ is an eigenvector of $G$ with eigenvalue $lambda$. Then, as you calculated, we find that
$$
G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)
$$

That is, we have two possibilities: either $T(u)$ is an eigenvector of $G$ associated with $lambda+1$ or $T(u) = 0$, which is to say that $T(u) in ker G$. Because $operatorname{null}(T) = 1$, we can deduce that $T(u) = 0$ will happen for exactly one eigenvector of $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Hint: You're nearly there. Slight correction: suppose that $u$ is an eigenvector of $G$ with eigenvalue $lambda$. Then, as you calculated, we find that
$$
G(T(u)) = (lambda+1)T(u)
$$

That is, we have two possibilities: either $T(u)$ is an eigenvector of $G$ associated with $lambda+1$ or $T(u) = 0$, which is to say that $T(u) in ker G$. Because $operatorname{null}(T) = 1$, we can deduce that $T(u) = 0$ will happen for exactly one eigenvector of $G$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 2 at 21:50









OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

129k794188




129k794188












  • $begingroup$
    Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Feb 2 at 21:51


















  • $begingroup$
    Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Feb 2 at 21:51
















$begingroup$
Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 2 at 21:51




$begingroup$
Note: this result is important in the study of semisimple Lie algebras
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 2 at 21:51


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097651%2flinear-operators-and-eigenvalue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith