Prove that the dual space of $R^n$ is $R^n$












0












$begingroup$


I was going through the proof of this question in "Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications" by Kreyszig.



(Apologies for not being able to type the whole of it)



enter image description here



I got stuck after the line where we took the supremum over all x of norm 1.




How did we arrive at the step of equality in the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?




Any good explanation would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I was going through the proof of this question in "Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications" by Kreyszig.



    (Apologies for not being able to type the whole of it)



    enter image description here



    I got stuck after the line where we took the supremum over all x of norm 1.




    How did we arrive at the step of equality in the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?




    Any good explanation would be helpful.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      I was going through the proof of this question in "Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications" by Kreyszig.



      (Apologies for not being able to type the whole of it)



      enter image description here



      I got stuck after the line where we took the supremum over all x of norm 1.




      How did we arrive at the step of equality in the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?




      Any good explanation would be helpful.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was going through the proof of this question in "Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications" by Kreyszig.



      (Apologies for not being able to type the whole of it)



      enter image description here



      I got stuck after the line where we took the supremum over all x of norm 1.




      How did we arrive at the step of equality in the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?




      Any good explanation would be helpful.







      functional-analysis proof-explanation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 27 at 10:16







      Shatabdi Sinha

















      asked Jan 27 at 9:57









      Shatabdi SinhaShatabdi Sinha

      18612




      18612






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Just calculate it directly;
          $$f(x)=sum_k xi_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_k^2=left(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}=|x|cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$$
          since $|x|=left(sum_kxi_k^2right)^{frac12} = left(sum_kgamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$ when the $xi$ and $gamma$ are equal. It's not norm $1$, but we can just multiply by a constant for that.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089357%2fprove-that-the-dual-space-of-rn-is-rn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Just calculate it directly;
            $$f(x)=sum_k xi_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_k^2=left(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}=|x|cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$$
            since $|x|=left(sum_kxi_k^2right)^{frac12} = left(sum_kgamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$ when the $xi$ and $gamma$ are equal. It's not norm $1$, but we can just multiply by a constant for that.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Just calculate it directly;
              $$f(x)=sum_k xi_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_k^2=left(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}=|x|cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$$
              since $|x|=left(sum_kxi_k^2right)^{frac12} = left(sum_kgamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$ when the $xi$ and $gamma$ are equal. It's not norm $1$, but we can just multiply by a constant for that.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Just calculate it directly;
                $$f(x)=sum_k xi_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_k^2=left(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}=|x|cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$$
                since $|x|=left(sum_kxi_k^2right)^{frac12} = left(sum_kgamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$ when the $xi$ and $gamma$ are equal. It's not norm $1$, but we can just multiply by a constant for that.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Just calculate it directly;
                $$f(x)=sum_k xi_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_kgamma_k = sum_k gamma_k^2=left(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}=|x|cdotleft(sum_k gamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$$
                since $|x|=left(sum_kxi_k^2right)^{frac12} = left(sum_kgamma_k^2right)^{frac12}$ when the $xi$ and $gamma$ are equal. It's not norm $1$, but we can just multiply by a constant for that.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 27 at 10:30









                jmerryjmerry

                16.1k1633




                16.1k1633






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089357%2fprove-that-the-dual-space-of-rn-is-rn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]