tensor transformation












0












$begingroup$


I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:



If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $



Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':



$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



and this equation holds:



$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$



The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:



$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $



I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.



It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 27 at 17:22
















0












$begingroup$


I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:



If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $



Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':



$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



and this equation holds:



$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$



The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:



$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $



I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.



It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 27 at 17:22














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:



If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $



Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':



$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



and this equation holds:



$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$



The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:



$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $



I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.



It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:



If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $



Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':



$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$



and this equation holds:



$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$



The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:



$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $



I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.



It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1







linear-transformations tensors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 28 at 8:27







Giuliano Malatesta

















asked Jan 27 at 9:43









Giuliano MalatestaGiuliano Malatesta

295




295












  • $begingroup$
    That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 27 at 17:22


















  • $begingroup$
    That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 27 at 17:22
















$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22




$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089342%2ftensor-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089342%2ftensor-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$