tensor transformation
$begingroup$
I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:
If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $
Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':
$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
and this equation holds:
$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$
The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:
$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $
I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.
It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1
linear-transformations tensors
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:
If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $
Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':
$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
and this equation holds:
$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$
The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:
$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $
I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.
It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1
linear-transformations tensors
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:
If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $
Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':
$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
and this equation holds:
$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$
The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:
$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $
I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.
It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1
linear-transformations tensors
$endgroup$
I don't understand a passage about tensor transformations in the book I'm reading. A tensor obeys the transformation law:
If $A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha } A_{munu} $
Where the $b_{munu}$ terms come out considering a coordinate transformation between two coordinates system S and S':
$x_nu' = alpha_nu + sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
$Delta x_nu' = sum_alpha b_{nu alpha } x_alpha$
and this equation holds:
$sum limits _{nu }b_{nu alpha }b_{nu beta }=delta _{alpha beta } quad(4)$
The books says that $delta _{alpha beta }$ is a tensor and that the following equation holds:
$A_{munu}' = b_{mu alpha }b_{tau alpha }=delta _{alpha beta } $
I don't understand how $A_{munu}$ has disappeared and how to derive it.
It is on paragraph 16: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Meaning_of_Relativity/Lecture_1
linear-transformations tensors
linear-transformations tensors
edited Jan 28 at 8:27
Giuliano Malatesta
asked Jan 27 at 9:43
Giuliano MalatestaGiuliano Malatesta
295
295
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089342%2ftensor-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089342%2ftensor-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
That is not the transformation law for tensors. With or without the Einstein summation convention, it makes no sense. (And given that you explicitly sum elsewhere, I assume you are not using the summation convention.) You have subscripts $alpha$ and $tau$ on the right that do not appear on the left (the summation convention would sum over $alpha$, explaining its disappearence, but it would also sum over $mu$, making it appear only on the left). I suggest you go study the actual tensor transformation law before attempting this book.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 27 at 17:22