the number of surface flaws found on the paintwork of new cars following their inspection after primer paint...
$begingroup$
The table below summarizes the number of surface flaws found on the paintwork of new cars following their inspection after primer paint was applied by a new method:
Find the variance of the number of flaws per car.
I found the mean but I don't know how to find the variance. Also, what kind of distribution is this?
Many thanks!
probability statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The table below summarizes the number of surface flaws found on the paintwork of new cars following their inspection after primer paint was applied by a new method:
Find the variance of the number of flaws per car.
I found the mean but I don't know how to find the variance. Also, what kind of distribution is this?
Many thanks!
probability statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The table below summarizes the number of surface flaws found on the paintwork of new cars following their inspection after primer paint was applied by a new method:
Find the variance of the number of flaws per car.
I found the mean but I don't know how to find the variance. Also, what kind of distribution is this?
Many thanks!
probability statistics probability-distributions
$endgroup$
The table below summarizes the number of surface flaws found on the paintwork of new cars following their inspection after primer paint was applied by a new method:
Find the variance of the number of flaws per car.
I found the mean but I don't know how to find the variance. Also, what kind of distribution is this?
Many thanks!
probability statistics probability-distributions
probability statistics probability-distributions
edited Feb 21 '17 at 23:33
Henry
101k482169
101k482169
asked Feb 21 '17 at 22:02
Just a girlJust a girl
9219
9219
2
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34
2
2
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here are the formulas I would use. I will leave it up to you to match them
with the notation in your textbook or notes, and to do the computation.
You have $k = 7$ values $v_1 = 0,, v_2 = 1,, dots,, v_7 = 6,$ and you have
$k$ corresponding frequencies $f_1 = 3,, f_2 = 7,, dots,, f_7 = 2.$
The total number of observations is $sum_{i=1}^k f_i = 40.$ You say
you have found the sample mean $bar X = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^k f_iv_i = 2.45.$
(Your book might call the values $x_i$ instead of my $v_i.$)
Then the sample variance is
$$ S_X^2 = frac{1}{n-1} sum_{i-1}^k f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$$
You might want to make a table with columns headed
$i,, f_i,, v_i, v_i - bar X,, (v_i - bar X)^2,$ and $f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$
(The body of the table will have seven rows.)
Then find the total of the last column and divide that total by $n-1 = 39.$
Note: This is a sample from some unknown discrete probability distribution. My best guess
is that the population distribution from which the data were randomly sampled
might be a Poisson distribution with mean approximately 2.45. But that is
only speculation. Samples from Poisson populations often have sample
means and variances that are numerically not far apart. My (unchecked!!) value for
the sample variance is a little above 2, so that encouraged me to mention
the Poisson idea. Maybe later in your course you will do a formal test
to see if the data are truly consistent with a Poisson population.
The sketch below shows your frequencies (bars) along with frequencies that
would be 'expected' if data were sampled from a Poisson distribution (red dots).
The fit does not look fantastic, but it is actually not bad for a sample
as small as $n = 40.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2155330%2fthe-number-of-surface-flaws-found-on-the-paintwork-of-new-cars-following-their-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here are the formulas I would use. I will leave it up to you to match them
with the notation in your textbook or notes, and to do the computation.
You have $k = 7$ values $v_1 = 0,, v_2 = 1,, dots,, v_7 = 6,$ and you have
$k$ corresponding frequencies $f_1 = 3,, f_2 = 7,, dots,, f_7 = 2.$
The total number of observations is $sum_{i=1}^k f_i = 40.$ You say
you have found the sample mean $bar X = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^k f_iv_i = 2.45.$
(Your book might call the values $x_i$ instead of my $v_i.$)
Then the sample variance is
$$ S_X^2 = frac{1}{n-1} sum_{i-1}^k f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$$
You might want to make a table with columns headed
$i,, f_i,, v_i, v_i - bar X,, (v_i - bar X)^2,$ and $f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$
(The body of the table will have seven rows.)
Then find the total of the last column and divide that total by $n-1 = 39.$
Note: This is a sample from some unknown discrete probability distribution. My best guess
is that the population distribution from which the data were randomly sampled
might be a Poisson distribution with mean approximately 2.45. But that is
only speculation. Samples from Poisson populations often have sample
means and variances that are numerically not far apart. My (unchecked!!) value for
the sample variance is a little above 2, so that encouraged me to mention
the Poisson idea. Maybe later in your course you will do a formal test
to see if the data are truly consistent with a Poisson population.
The sketch below shows your frequencies (bars) along with frequencies that
would be 'expected' if data were sampled from a Poisson distribution (red dots).
The fit does not look fantastic, but it is actually not bad for a sample
as small as $n = 40.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are the formulas I would use. I will leave it up to you to match them
with the notation in your textbook or notes, and to do the computation.
You have $k = 7$ values $v_1 = 0,, v_2 = 1,, dots,, v_7 = 6,$ and you have
$k$ corresponding frequencies $f_1 = 3,, f_2 = 7,, dots,, f_7 = 2.$
The total number of observations is $sum_{i=1}^k f_i = 40.$ You say
you have found the sample mean $bar X = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^k f_iv_i = 2.45.$
(Your book might call the values $x_i$ instead of my $v_i.$)
Then the sample variance is
$$ S_X^2 = frac{1}{n-1} sum_{i-1}^k f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$$
You might want to make a table with columns headed
$i,, f_i,, v_i, v_i - bar X,, (v_i - bar X)^2,$ and $f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$
(The body of the table will have seven rows.)
Then find the total of the last column and divide that total by $n-1 = 39.$
Note: This is a sample from some unknown discrete probability distribution. My best guess
is that the population distribution from which the data were randomly sampled
might be a Poisson distribution with mean approximately 2.45. But that is
only speculation. Samples from Poisson populations often have sample
means and variances that are numerically not far apart. My (unchecked!!) value for
the sample variance is a little above 2, so that encouraged me to mention
the Poisson idea. Maybe later in your course you will do a formal test
to see if the data are truly consistent with a Poisson population.
The sketch below shows your frequencies (bars) along with frequencies that
would be 'expected' if data were sampled from a Poisson distribution (red dots).
The fit does not look fantastic, but it is actually not bad for a sample
as small as $n = 40.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are the formulas I would use. I will leave it up to you to match them
with the notation in your textbook or notes, and to do the computation.
You have $k = 7$ values $v_1 = 0,, v_2 = 1,, dots,, v_7 = 6,$ and you have
$k$ corresponding frequencies $f_1 = 3,, f_2 = 7,, dots,, f_7 = 2.$
The total number of observations is $sum_{i=1}^k f_i = 40.$ You say
you have found the sample mean $bar X = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^k f_iv_i = 2.45.$
(Your book might call the values $x_i$ instead of my $v_i.$)
Then the sample variance is
$$ S_X^2 = frac{1}{n-1} sum_{i-1}^k f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$$
You might want to make a table with columns headed
$i,, f_i,, v_i, v_i - bar X,, (v_i - bar X)^2,$ and $f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$
(The body of the table will have seven rows.)
Then find the total of the last column and divide that total by $n-1 = 39.$
Note: This is a sample from some unknown discrete probability distribution. My best guess
is that the population distribution from which the data were randomly sampled
might be a Poisson distribution with mean approximately 2.45. But that is
only speculation. Samples from Poisson populations often have sample
means and variances that are numerically not far apart. My (unchecked!!) value for
the sample variance is a little above 2, so that encouraged me to mention
the Poisson idea. Maybe later in your course you will do a formal test
to see if the data are truly consistent with a Poisson population.
The sketch below shows your frequencies (bars) along with frequencies that
would be 'expected' if data were sampled from a Poisson distribution (red dots).
The fit does not look fantastic, but it is actually not bad for a sample
as small as $n = 40.$
$endgroup$
Here are the formulas I would use. I will leave it up to you to match them
with the notation in your textbook or notes, and to do the computation.
You have $k = 7$ values $v_1 = 0,, v_2 = 1,, dots,, v_7 = 6,$ and you have
$k$ corresponding frequencies $f_1 = 3,, f_2 = 7,, dots,, f_7 = 2.$
The total number of observations is $sum_{i=1}^k f_i = 40.$ You say
you have found the sample mean $bar X = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^k f_iv_i = 2.45.$
(Your book might call the values $x_i$ instead of my $v_i.$)
Then the sample variance is
$$ S_X^2 = frac{1}{n-1} sum_{i-1}^k f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$$
You might want to make a table with columns headed
$i,, f_i,, v_i, v_i - bar X,, (v_i - bar X)^2,$ and $f_i(v_i - bar X)^2.$
(The body of the table will have seven rows.)
Then find the total of the last column and divide that total by $n-1 = 39.$
Note: This is a sample from some unknown discrete probability distribution. My best guess
is that the population distribution from which the data were randomly sampled
might be a Poisson distribution with mean approximately 2.45. But that is
only speculation. Samples from Poisson populations often have sample
means and variances that are numerically not far apart. My (unchecked!!) value for
the sample variance is a little above 2, so that encouraged me to mention
the Poisson idea. Maybe later in your course you will do a formal test
to see if the data are truly consistent with a Poisson population.
The sketch below shows your frequencies (bars) along with frequencies that
would be 'expected' if data were sampled from a Poisson distribution (red dots).
The fit does not look fantastic, but it is actually not bad for a sample
as small as $n = 40.$
edited Feb 22 '17 at 1:17
answered Feb 22 '17 at 0:35
BruceETBruceET
36k71540
36k71540
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2155330%2fthe-number-of-surface-flaws-found-on-the-paintwork-of-new-cars-following-their-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
It is a discrete distribution, but not a special one. Just use your definition of variance to calculate it
$endgroup$
– Henry
Feb 21 '17 at 23:34