How to define a random variable of an indicator function and find the smallest sigma algebra such that X is...












0












$begingroup$


Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$



Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$



That is :



$$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
1& omegageq2,\
0& text{otherwise}.
end{cases}$$



Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.



Here is my attempt:



I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:



$$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
end{cases}$$



Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$



Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$



Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.



I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.



Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$



    Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$



    That is :



    $$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
    1& omegageq2,\
    0& text{otherwise}.
    end{cases}$$



    Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.



    Here is my attempt:



    I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:



    $$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
    phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
    0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
    2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
    3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
    Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
    end{cases}$$



    Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$



    Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$



    Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.



    I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.



    Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$



      Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$



      That is :



      $$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
      1& omegageq2,\
      0& text{otherwise}.
      end{cases}$$



      Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.



      Here is my attempt:



      I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:



      $$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
      phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
      0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
      2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
      3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
      Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
      end{cases}$$



      Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$



      Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$



      Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.



      I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.



      Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$



      Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$



      That is :



      $$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
      1& omegageq2,\
      0& text{otherwise}.
      end{cases}$$



      Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.



      Here is my attempt:



      I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:



      $$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
      phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
      0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
      2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
      3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
      Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
      end{cases}$$



      Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$



      Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$



      Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.



      I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.



      Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.







      measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 29 at 16:25









      Andrés E. Caicedo

      65.8k8160251




      65.8k8160251










      asked Jan 28 at 23:08









      Victor NogueiraVictor Nogueira

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
            $endgroup$
            – Victor Nogueira
            Jan 28 at 23:20














          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091520%2fhow-to-define-a-random-variable-of-an-indicator-function-and-find-the-smallest-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
            $endgroup$
            – Victor Nogueira
            Jan 28 at 23:20


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
            $endgroup$
            – Victor Nogueira
            Jan 28 at 23:20
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 28 at 23:12









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          71.1k53170




          71.1k53170












          • $begingroup$
            So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
            $endgroup$
            – Victor Nogueira
            Jan 28 at 23:20




















          • $begingroup$
            So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
            $endgroup$
            – Victor Nogueira
            Jan 28 at 23:20


















          $begingroup$
          So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
          $endgroup$
          – Victor Nogueira
          Jan 28 at 23:20






          $begingroup$
          So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
          $endgroup$
          – Victor Nogueira
          Jan 28 at 23:20




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091520%2fhow-to-define-a-random-variable-of-an-indicator-function-and-find-the-smallest-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory