How to define a random variable of an indicator function and find the smallest sigma algebra such that X is...
$begingroup$
Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$
Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$
That is :
$$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
1& omegageq2,\
0& text{otherwise}.
end{cases}$$
Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.
Here is my attempt:
I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:
$$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
end{cases}$$
Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$
Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$
Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.
I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.
Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.
measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$
Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$
That is :
$$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
1& omegageq2,\
0& text{otherwise}.
end{cases}$$
Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.
Here is my attempt:
I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:
$$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
end{cases}$$
Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$
Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$
Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.
I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.
Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.
measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$
Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$
That is :
$$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
1& omegageq2,\
0& text{otherwise}.
end{cases}$$
Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.
Here is my attempt:
I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:
$$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
end{cases}$$
Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$
Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$
Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.
I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.
Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.
measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
Let $Omega$ = ${1,2,3}$
Define the random variable $x(omega) = omegacdot1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}}$
That is :
$$1_{{omegainOmega:omegageq2)}} = begin{cases}
1& omegageq2,\
0& text{otherwise}.
end{cases}$$
Then I need to find the smallest sigma- algebra such that X is measurable, or induced by X.
Here is my attempt:
I used the inverse mapping of omega as follows:
$$x(omega)^{-1} = begin{cases}
phi& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
0& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 notin omega land 3 notin omega \
2& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 in omega land 3 notin omega \
3& text{if } 1 notin omega land 2 notin omega land 3 in omega \
Omega& text{if } 1 in omega land 2 in omega land 3 in omega \
end{cases}$$
Let the smallest sigma algebra be $lambda$
Then I get that $$lambda = { {1}, {2}, {3}, {2,3}, {1,3}, {1,2} ,phi ,lambda } $$
Which would inherently be the power set as I understand it.
I feel like I may be missing something here as I am seeing the smallest sigma algebra be the power set, however that may be the point of the exercise.
Can anyone shed some light on my intuition here? I appreciate it.
measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure
measure-theory elementary-set-theory lebesgue-measure
edited Jan 29 at 16:25
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.8k8160251
65.8k8160251
asked Jan 28 at 23:08
Victor NogueiraVictor Nogueira
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091520%2fhow-to-define-a-random-variable-of-an-indicator-function-and-find-the-smallest-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].
$endgroup$
The sigma algebra generated is ${emptyset, {1},{2,3},{1,2,3}}$. [ $sigma(x)={x^{-1} (A):A text {is a Borel set in} mathbb R}$].
answered Jan 28 at 23:12


Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
71.1k53170
71.1k53170
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
$begingroup$
So, essentially, the element ${1}$ needs to be in its own set and the compliment of that element is the elements ${2, 3}$ which are by definition included in the sigma algebra. Can these elements be listed as simply as that? My understanding in this space is somewhat limited, but I thought that ${2}$ and ${3}$ would need to be input as their own elements in the sigma algebra - hence my result.
$endgroup$
– Victor Nogueira
Jan 28 at 23:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091520%2fhow-to-define-a-random-variable-of-an-indicator-function-and-find-the-smallest-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown