What is the measure of $(infty,infty)$












0












$begingroup$


I'm dealing with a counter-example. Specifically, let $E = cap_{k=1}^{infty}E_k$ and $E_{k+1} subset E_k$. We have



$$m(E) = lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$$



only if $m(E) < infty$. My book says $E_n = (n, infty)$ is a counter-example when $m(E)$ is not less than $infty$. $E = cap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n$ is empty so it has measure zero. Then what is $lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$? The way that I think about it is that you need to cover $lim_{n to infty} E_n$ with $(infty, infty)$, and the measure of $(infty, infty)$ is $infty$? Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm dealing with a counter-example. Specifically, let $E = cap_{k=1}^{infty}E_k$ and $E_{k+1} subset E_k$. We have



    $$m(E) = lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$$



    only if $m(E) < infty$. My book says $E_n = (n, infty)$ is a counter-example when $m(E)$ is not less than $infty$. $E = cap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n$ is empty so it has measure zero. Then what is $lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$? The way that I think about it is that you need to cover $lim_{n to infty} E_n$ with $(infty, infty)$, and the measure of $(infty, infty)$ is $infty$? Is that correct?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm dealing with a counter-example. Specifically, let $E = cap_{k=1}^{infty}E_k$ and $E_{k+1} subset E_k$. We have



      $$m(E) = lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$$



      only if $m(E) < infty$. My book says $E_n = (n, infty)$ is a counter-example when $m(E)$ is not less than $infty$. $E = cap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n$ is empty so it has measure zero. Then what is $lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$? The way that I think about it is that you need to cover $lim_{n to infty} E_n$ with $(infty, infty)$, and the measure of $(infty, infty)$ is $infty$? Is that correct?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm dealing with a counter-example. Specifically, let $E = cap_{k=1}^{infty}E_k$ and $E_{k+1} subset E_k$. We have



      $$m(E) = lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$$



      only if $m(E) < infty$. My book says $E_n = (n, infty)$ is a counter-example when $m(E)$ is not less than $infty$. $E = cap_{n=1}^{infty}E_n$ is empty so it has measure zero. Then what is $lim_{n to infty} m(E_n)$? The way that I think about it is that you need to cover $lim_{n to infty} E_n$ with $(infty, infty)$, and the measure of $(infty, infty)$ is $infty$? Is that correct?







      measure-theory lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 29 at 3:39









      user1691278user1691278

      49939




      49939






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $M>0$ be arbitrary. Then $m(E_n) > m((n, n+M)) = M$. Since this is true for any $n$,



          $$lim_{ntoinfty} m(E_n) =infty$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
            $endgroup$
            – user1691278
            Jan 29 at 4:10






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Jan 29 at 5:52



















          1












          $begingroup$

          $m(E_n)=infty$ for each $n$ so $lim m(E_n)=infty$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            In this context, $infty$ is a well-defined mathematical object that comprises a single point at the "end" of the real number line - that is, for every other real number $x$, $x < infty$. The same total ordering properties apply as before, and thus there are no "numbers" strictly between $infty$ and itself. This means $(infty, infty)$ is an empty interval, thus its measure is $0$.



            On the other hand, the measure of every interval $(x, infty)$ for finite $x$ is $infty$. So the limit of measures as $x$ goes to $infty$ is $infty$, however the measure of the "final" interval $E = (infty, infty)$ is, as above, $0$, thus a counterexample for the case where the "approximating" intervals do have infinite measure.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091708%2fwhat-is-the-measure-of-infty-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              Let $M>0$ be arbitrary. Then $m(E_n) > m((n, n+M)) = M$. Since this is true for any $n$,



              $$lim_{ntoinfty} m(E_n) =infty$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
                $endgroup$
                – user1691278
                Jan 29 at 4:10






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
                $endgroup$
                – Kavi Rama Murthy
                Jan 29 at 5:52
















              2












              $begingroup$

              Let $M>0$ be arbitrary. Then $m(E_n) > m((n, n+M)) = M$. Since this is true for any $n$,



              $$lim_{ntoinfty} m(E_n) =infty$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
                $endgroup$
                – user1691278
                Jan 29 at 4:10






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
                $endgroup$
                – Kavi Rama Murthy
                Jan 29 at 5:52














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              Let $M>0$ be arbitrary. Then $m(E_n) > m((n, n+M)) = M$. Since this is true for any $n$,



              $$lim_{ntoinfty} m(E_n) =infty$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Let $M>0$ be arbitrary. Then $m(E_n) > m((n, n+M)) = M$. Since this is true for any $n$,



              $$lim_{ntoinfty} m(E_n) =infty$$







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Jan 29 at 3:48









              David PetersonDavid Peterson

              8,87821935




              8,87821935












              • $begingroup$
                You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
                $endgroup$
                – user1691278
                Jan 29 at 4:10






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
                $endgroup$
                – Kavi Rama Murthy
                Jan 29 at 5:52


















              • $begingroup$
                You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
                $endgroup$
                – user1691278
                Jan 29 at 4:10






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
                $endgroup$
                – Kavi Rama Murthy
                Jan 29 at 5:52
















              $begingroup$
              You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
              $endgroup$
              – user1691278
              Jan 29 at 4:10




              $begingroup$
              You get $infty$ as the limit because $M$ is arbitrary and $m(E_n)$ is greater than any number?
              $endgroup$
              – user1691278
              Jan 29 at 4:10




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Jan 29 at 5:52




              $begingroup$
              @user1691278 Unlike Calculus you shouldn't hesitate to use $infty$ in Lebesgue integration.
              $endgroup$
              – Kavi Rama Murthy
              Jan 29 at 5:52











              1












              $begingroup$

              $m(E_n)=infty$ for each $n$ so $lim m(E_n)=infty$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                $m(E_n)=infty$ for each $n$ so $lim m(E_n)=infty$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  $m(E_n)=infty$ for each $n$ so $lim m(E_n)=infty$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $m(E_n)=infty$ for each $n$ so $lim m(E_n)=infty$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 29 at 5:51









                  Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                  71.2k53170




                  71.2k53170























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      In this context, $infty$ is a well-defined mathematical object that comprises a single point at the "end" of the real number line - that is, for every other real number $x$, $x < infty$. The same total ordering properties apply as before, and thus there are no "numbers" strictly between $infty$ and itself. This means $(infty, infty)$ is an empty interval, thus its measure is $0$.



                      On the other hand, the measure of every interval $(x, infty)$ for finite $x$ is $infty$. So the limit of measures as $x$ goes to $infty$ is $infty$, however the measure of the "final" interval $E = (infty, infty)$ is, as above, $0$, thus a counterexample for the case where the "approximating" intervals do have infinite measure.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        In this context, $infty$ is a well-defined mathematical object that comprises a single point at the "end" of the real number line - that is, for every other real number $x$, $x < infty$. The same total ordering properties apply as before, and thus there are no "numbers" strictly between $infty$ and itself. This means $(infty, infty)$ is an empty interval, thus its measure is $0$.



                        On the other hand, the measure of every interval $(x, infty)$ for finite $x$ is $infty$. So the limit of measures as $x$ goes to $infty$ is $infty$, however the measure of the "final" interval $E = (infty, infty)$ is, as above, $0$, thus a counterexample for the case where the "approximating" intervals do have infinite measure.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          In this context, $infty$ is a well-defined mathematical object that comprises a single point at the "end" of the real number line - that is, for every other real number $x$, $x < infty$. The same total ordering properties apply as before, and thus there are no "numbers" strictly between $infty$ and itself. This means $(infty, infty)$ is an empty interval, thus its measure is $0$.



                          On the other hand, the measure of every interval $(x, infty)$ for finite $x$ is $infty$. So the limit of measures as $x$ goes to $infty$ is $infty$, however the measure of the "final" interval $E = (infty, infty)$ is, as above, $0$, thus a counterexample for the case where the "approximating" intervals do have infinite measure.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          In this context, $infty$ is a well-defined mathematical object that comprises a single point at the "end" of the real number line - that is, for every other real number $x$, $x < infty$. The same total ordering properties apply as before, and thus there are no "numbers" strictly between $infty$ and itself. This means $(infty, infty)$ is an empty interval, thus its measure is $0$.



                          On the other hand, the measure of every interval $(x, infty)$ for finite $x$ is $infty$. So the limit of measures as $x$ goes to $infty$ is $infty$, however the measure of the "final" interval $E = (infty, infty)$ is, as above, $0$, thus a counterexample for the case where the "approximating" intervals do have infinite measure.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 29 at 7:17









                          The_SympathizerThe_Sympathizer

                          7,8002246




                          7,8002246






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091708%2fwhat-is-the-measure-of-infty-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                              A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$