Signed and unsigned integers with logical operators












1















int x = /* some integer */; 
unsigned int ux = (unsigned) x;


we have



x >= 0 || x < ux


we know that in x < ux the first x is cast implicitly to unsigned but is the first x in x >= 0 (1) cast to unsigned implicitly?










share|improve this question

























  • Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

    – chux
    Jan 2 at 22:09
















1















int x = /* some integer */; 
unsigned int ux = (unsigned) x;


we have



x >= 0 || x < ux


we know that in x < ux the first x is cast implicitly to unsigned but is the first x in x >= 0 (1) cast to unsigned implicitly?










share|improve this question

























  • Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

    – chux
    Jan 2 at 22:09














1












1








1








int x = /* some integer */; 
unsigned int ux = (unsigned) x;


we have



x >= 0 || x < ux


we know that in x < ux the first x is cast implicitly to unsigned but is the first x in x >= 0 (1) cast to unsigned implicitly?










share|improve this question
















int x = /* some integer */; 
unsigned int ux = (unsigned) x;


we have



x >= 0 || x < ux


we know that in x < ux the first x is cast implicitly to unsigned but is the first x in x >= 0 (1) cast to unsigned implicitly?







c casting operators






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 2 at 18:33









bolov

33.3k877141




33.3k877141










asked Jan 2 at 18:29









durnovvdurnovv

546




546













  • Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

    – chux
    Jan 2 at 22:09



















  • Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

    – chux
    Jan 2 at 22:09

















Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

– chux
Jan 2 at 22:09





Detail: x is not cast - there is no cast in x < ux. x is converted to an unsigned.

– chux
Jan 2 at 22:09












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














No. It happens operator by operator.



x >= 0 || x < ux


is naturally



(x >= 0) || (x < ux)


Since x and 0 are both ints, there is no need for any (usual arithmetic) conversions...



And even though x is converted to unsigned in x < ux, the value of the expression x < ux is of type int - either 0 or 1 (just like on the the left-hand side).






share|improve this answer

































    1














    No it isn’t.



    This is because x >= 0 is an expression. (Formally 0 is an octal constant of type int.)



    Try 1 / 2 * 1.0 for a more pernicious example. This is grouped as (1 / 2) * 1.0 and is zero since the integers in the expression 1 / 2 are not promoted to floating point.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Thanks, makes sense

      – durnovv
      Jan 2 at 18:35











    • @durnovv It’s a good question though!

      – Bathsheba
      Jan 2 at 18:35



















    0














    No, 0 is an int, so there are no promotions in the x >= 0 part of your expression.






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011382%2fsigned-and-unsigned-integers-with-logical-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      No. It happens operator by operator.



      x >= 0 || x < ux


      is naturally



      (x >= 0) || (x < ux)


      Since x and 0 are both ints, there is no need for any (usual arithmetic) conversions...



      And even though x is converted to unsigned in x < ux, the value of the expression x < ux is of type int - either 0 or 1 (just like on the the left-hand side).






      share|improve this answer






























        4














        No. It happens operator by operator.



        x >= 0 || x < ux


        is naturally



        (x >= 0) || (x < ux)


        Since x and 0 are both ints, there is no need for any (usual arithmetic) conversions...



        And even though x is converted to unsigned in x < ux, the value of the expression x < ux is of type int - either 0 or 1 (just like on the the left-hand side).






        share|improve this answer




























          4












          4








          4







          No. It happens operator by operator.



          x >= 0 || x < ux


          is naturally



          (x >= 0) || (x < ux)


          Since x and 0 are both ints, there is no need for any (usual arithmetic) conversions...



          And even though x is converted to unsigned in x < ux, the value of the expression x < ux is of type int - either 0 or 1 (just like on the the left-hand side).






          share|improve this answer















          No. It happens operator by operator.



          x >= 0 || x < ux


          is naturally



          (x >= 0) || (x < ux)


          Since x and 0 are both ints, there is no need for any (usual arithmetic) conversions...



          And even though x is converted to unsigned in x < ux, the value of the expression x < ux is of type int - either 0 or 1 (just like on the the left-hand side).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 2 at 19:59

























          answered Jan 2 at 18:32









          Antti HaapalaAntti Haapala

          85.5k16162204




          85.5k16162204

























              1














              No it isn’t.



              This is because x >= 0 is an expression. (Formally 0 is an octal constant of type int.)



              Try 1 / 2 * 1.0 for a more pernicious example. This is grouped as (1 / 2) * 1.0 and is zero since the integers in the expression 1 / 2 are not promoted to floating point.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Thanks, makes sense

                – durnovv
                Jan 2 at 18:35











              • @durnovv It’s a good question though!

                – Bathsheba
                Jan 2 at 18:35
















              1














              No it isn’t.



              This is because x >= 0 is an expression. (Formally 0 is an octal constant of type int.)



              Try 1 / 2 * 1.0 for a more pernicious example. This is grouped as (1 / 2) * 1.0 and is zero since the integers in the expression 1 / 2 are not promoted to floating point.






              share|improve this answer


























              • Thanks, makes sense

                – durnovv
                Jan 2 at 18:35











              • @durnovv It’s a good question though!

                – Bathsheba
                Jan 2 at 18:35














              1












              1








              1







              No it isn’t.



              This is because x >= 0 is an expression. (Formally 0 is an octal constant of type int.)



              Try 1 / 2 * 1.0 for a more pernicious example. This is grouped as (1 / 2) * 1.0 and is zero since the integers in the expression 1 / 2 are not promoted to floating point.






              share|improve this answer















              No it isn’t.



              This is because x >= 0 is an expression. (Formally 0 is an octal constant of type int.)



              Try 1 / 2 * 1.0 for a more pernicious example. This is grouped as (1 / 2) * 1.0 and is zero since the integers in the expression 1 / 2 are not promoted to floating point.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jan 2 at 18:35

























              answered Jan 2 at 18:33









              BathshebaBathsheba

              181k27256384




              181k27256384













              • Thanks, makes sense

                – durnovv
                Jan 2 at 18:35











              • @durnovv It’s a good question though!

                – Bathsheba
                Jan 2 at 18:35



















              • Thanks, makes sense

                – durnovv
                Jan 2 at 18:35











              • @durnovv It’s a good question though!

                – Bathsheba
                Jan 2 at 18:35

















              Thanks, makes sense

              – durnovv
              Jan 2 at 18:35





              Thanks, makes sense

              – durnovv
              Jan 2 at 18:35













              @durnovv It’s a good question though!

              – Bathsheba
              Jan 2 at 18:35





              @durnovv It’s a good question though!

              – Bathsheba
              Jan 2 at 18:35











              0














              No, 0 is an int, so there are no promotions in the x >= 0 part of your expression.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                No, 0 is an int, so there are no promotions in the x >= 0 part of your expression.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  No, 0 is an int, so there are no promotions in the x >= 0 part of your expression.






                  share|improve this answer













                  No, 0 is an int, so there are no promotions in the x >= 0 part of your expression.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 2 at 18:32









                  Carl NorumCarl Norum

                  177k22347424




                  177k22347424






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54011382%2fsigned-and-unsigned-integers-with-logical-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith