Finite Length Modules
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring. If $M, N$ and $L$ are $R$-modules, with, $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty,$ and $M times N cong M times L,$ it is true that $N cong L?$
The same occurs replacing $times$ by $oplus$ or $otimes?$
When the converse is true? That is, if $M times N cong M times L, $$N cong L$ and (additional hypothesis), then $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty$?
For example, we know that, if $ell(M), ell(N) < infty,$ then $ell(M otimes N) le ell(M) ell(N),$ but this is not useful in a general case.
ring-theory modules tensor-products direct-sum
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring. If $M, N$ and $L$ are $R$-modules, with, $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty,$ and $M times N cong M times L,$ it is true that $N cong L?$
The same occurs replacing $times$ by $oplus$ or $otimes?$
When the converse is true? That is, if $M times N cong M times L, $$N cong L$ and (additional hypothesis), then $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty$?
For example, we know that, if $ell(M), ell(N) < infty,$ then $ell(M otimes N) le ell(M) ell(N),$ but this is not useful in a general case.
ring-theory modules tensor-products direct-sum
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a ring. If $M, N$ and $L$ are $R$-modules, with, $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty,$ and $M times N cong M times L,$ it is true that $N cong L?$
The same occurs replacing $times$ by $oplus$ or $otimes?$
When the converse is true? That is, if $M times N cong M times L, $$N cong L$ and (additional hypothesis), then $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty$?
For example, we know that, if $ell(M), ell(N) < infty,$ then $ell(M otimes N) le ell(M) ell(N),$ but this is not useful in a general case.
ring-theory modules tensor-products direct-sum
Let $R$ be a ring. If $M, N$ and $L$ are $R$-modules, with, $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty,$ and $M times N cong M times L,$ it is true that $N cong L?$
The same occurs replacing $times$ by $oplus$ or $otimes?$
When the converse is true? That is, if $M times N cong M times L, $$N cong L$ and (additional hypothesis), then $ell(M), ell(N), ell(L) < infty$?
For example, we know that, if $ell(M), ell(N) < infty,$ then $ell(M otimes N) le ell(M) ell(N),$ but this is not useful in a general case.
ring-theory modules tensor-products direct-sum
ring-theory modules tensor-products direct-sum
asked 2 days ago
674123173797 - 4
1237
1237
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005470%2ffinite-length-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown