How to compute the Fourier transform of $e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to compute the Fourier transform of $f(x)=e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}$ where $x$ is the vector in $mathbb{R}^n$. I know that the Fourier transform of a radial function is radial but cannot see how to use the fact to calculate the following integrate
begin{equation}
hat{f}(y)=int_{mathbb{R}^n} {e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}} e^{-2pi x cdot y } dx
end{equation}
Could anyone please help me?
analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to compute the Fourier transform of $f(x)=e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}$ where $x$ is the vector in $mathbb{R}^n$. I know that the Fourier transform of a radial function is radial but cannot see how to use the fact to calculate the following integrate
begin{equation}
hat{f}(y)=int_{mathbb{R}^n} {e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}} e^{-2pi x cdot y } dx
end{equation}
Could anyone please help me?
analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to compute the Fourier transform of $f(x)=e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}$ where $x$ is the vector in $mathbb{R}^n$. I know that the Fourier transform of a radial function is radial but cannot see how to use the fact to calculate the following integrate
begin{equation}
hat{f}(y)=int_{mathbb{R}^n} {e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}} e^{-2pi x cdot y } dx
end{equation}
Could anyone please help me?
analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
I want to compute the Fourier transform of $f(x)=e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}$ where $x$ is the vector in $mathbb{R}^n$. I know that the Fourier transform of a radial function is radial but cannot see how to use the fact to calculate the following integrate
begin{equation}
hat{f}(y)=int_{mathbb{R}^n} {e^{-2pi {mid x mid}}} e^{-2pi x cdot y } dx
end{equation}
Could anyone please help me?
analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
analysis fourier-analysis fourier-transform
edited 2 days ago
Bernard
115k637108
115k637108
asked 2 days ago
Keith
1,395820
1,395820
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago
add a comment |
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
From Bracewell, the n-dimensional Fourier Transform
$$F(s_1, dots, s_n) = int_{-infty}^{infty} dots int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x_1,dots, x_n) e^{-2pi i (x_1 s_1 + dots + x_n s_n)} space dx_1 dots dx_n $$
when there is n-dimensional symmetry, can be manipulated into
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} f(r) J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
Where $r$ and $q$ are the radii from the origin in the original domain and transform domain respectively.
So that the cases of $n=1$ and $n=3$ don't seem so foreign, it is probably worth noting that
$$J_{-frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}cos(x)$$
$$J_{frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}sin(x)$$
I'm not quite sure I know what you meant by $|x|$ in your original problem statement, but if you just meant the magnitude of $x$, then the specific transform you wanted to compute looks like
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
For $n=1$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pisqrt{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}cos(2pi qr)space sqrt{r} space dr\
\
&= 2 int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} cos(2pi qr)space dr \
\
&=int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} left(e^{i2pi qr} + e^{-i2pi qr}right)space dr \
\
&= left[dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1-iq)} + dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{-i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1+iq)}right]Biggr|_0^infty\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi}left[dfrac{1}{1-iq}+dfrac{1}{1+iq}right]\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{2}{1+q^2}
end{align*}$$
which is exactly what one would expect for the 1 dimensional Fourier Transform.
For $n=2$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pi int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{0}(2pi qr)space r space dr\
\
&mbox{(Hankel Transform table lookup)}\
\
&= dfrac{2pi (2pi)}{left[(2pi q)^2 + (2pi)^2right]^{frac{3}{2}}}\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{1}{left(1+q^2right)^{frac{3}{2}}}
end{align*}$$
For $n =3$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= dfrac{2pi}{sqrt{q}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}sin(2pi qr)space r^{frac{3}{2}} space dr \
\
&= dfrac{2}{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sin(2pi qr)space r space dr \
\
&mbox{(Wolfram Alpha invocation in lieu of integration by parts)}
\
&= dfrac{1}{(2pi)^2}dfrac{4}{(1+q^2)^2}\
end{align*}$$
And I suppose I'll let you keep on going until you see a pattern in terms of $n$ emerge.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
From Bracewell, the n-dimensional Fourier Transform
$$F(s_1, dots, s_n) = int_{-infty}^{infty} dots int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x_1,dots, x_n) e^{-2pi i (x_1 s_1 + dots + x_n s_n)} space dx_1 dots dx_n $$
when there is n-dimensional symmetry, can be manipulated into
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} f(r) J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
Where $r$ and $q$ are the radii from the origin in the original domain and transform domain respectively.
So that the cases of $n=1$ and $n=3$ don't seem so foreign, it is probably worth noting that
$$J_{-frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}cos(x)$$
$$J_{frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}sin(x)$$
I'm not quite sure I know what you meant by $|x|$ in your original problem statement, but if you just meant the magnitude of $x$, then the specific transform you wanted to compute looks like
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
For $n=1$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pisqrt{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}cos(2pi qr)space sqrt{r} space dr\
\
&= 2 int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} cos(2pi qr)space dr \
\
&=int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} left(e^{i2pi qr} + e^{-i2pi qr}right)space dr \
\
&= left[dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1-iq)} + dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{-i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1+iq)}right]Biggr|_0^infty\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi}left[dfrac{1}{1-iq}+dfrac{1}{1+iq}right]\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{2}{1+q^2}
end{align*}$$
which is exactly what one would expect for the 1 dimensional Fourier Transform.
For $n=2$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pi int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{0}(2pi qr)space r space dr\
\
&mbox{(Hankel Transform table lookup)}\
\
&= dfrac{2pi (2pi)}{left[(2pi q)^2 + (2pi)^2right]^{frac{3}{2}}}\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{1}{left(1+q^2right)^{frac{3}{2}}}
end{align*}$$
For $n =3$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= dfrac{2pi}{sqrt{q}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}sin(2pi qr)space r^{frac{3}{2}} space dr \
\
&= dfrac{2}{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sin(2pi qr)space r space dr \
\
&mbox{(Wolfram Alpha invocation in lieu of integration by parts)}
\
&= dfrac{1}{(2pi)^2}dfrac{4}{(1+q^2)^2}\
end{align*}$$
And I suppose I'll let you keep on going until you see a pattern in terms of $n$ emerge.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
From Bracewell, the n-dimensional Fourier Transform
$$F(s_1, dots, s_n) = int_{-infty}^{infty} dots int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x_1,dots, x_n) e^{-2pi i (x_1 s_1 + dots + x_n s_n)} space dx_1 dots dx_n $$
when there is n-dimensional symmetry, can be manipulated into
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} f(r) J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
Where $r$ and $q$ are the radii from the origin in the original domain and transform domain respectively.
So that the cases of $n=1$ and $n=3$ don't seem so foreign, it is probably worth noting that
$$J_{-frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}cos(x)$$
$$J_{frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}sin(x)$$
I'm not quite sure I know what you meant by $|x|$ in your original problem statement, but if you just meant the magnitude of $x$, then the specific transform you wanted to compute looks like
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
For $n=1$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pisqrt{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}cos(2pi qr)space sqrt{r} space dr\
\
&= 2 int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} cos(2pi qr)space dr \
\
&=int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} left(e^{i2pi qr} + e^{-i2pi qr}right)space dr \
\
&= left[dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1-iq)} + dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{-i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1+iq)}right]Biggr|_0^infty\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi}left[dfrac{1}{1-iq}+dfrac{1}{1+iq}right]\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{2}{1+q^2}
end{align*}$$
which is exactly what one would expect for the 1 dimensional Fourier Transform.
For $n=2$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pi int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{0}(2pi qr)space r space dr\
\
&mbox{(Hankel Transform table lookup)}\
\
&= dfrac{2pi (2pi)}{left[(2pi q)^2 + (2pi)^2right]^{frac{3}{2}}}\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{1}{left(1+q^2right)^{frac{3}{2}}}
end{align*}$$
For $n =3$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= dfrac{2pi}{sqrt{q}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}sin(2pi qr)space r^{frac{3}{2}} space dr \
\
&= dfrac{2}{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sin(2pi qr)space r space dr \
\
&mbox{(Wolfram Alpha invocation in lieu of integration by parts)}
\
&= dfrac{1}{(2pi)^2}dfrac{4}{(1+q^2)^2}\
end{align*}$$
And I suppose I'll let you keep on going until you see a pattern in terms of $n$ emerge.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
From Bracewell, the n-dimensional Fourier Transform
$$F(s_1, dots, s_n) = int_{-infty}^{infty} dots int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x_1,dots, x_n) e^{-2pi i (x_1 s_1 + dots + x_n s_n)} space dx_1 dots dx_n $$
when there is n-dimensional symmetry, can be manipulated into
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} f(r) J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
Where $r$ and $q$ are the radii from the origin in the original domain and transform domain respectively.
So that the cases of $n=1$ and $n=3$ don't seem so foreign, it is probably worth noting that
$$J_{-frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}cos(x)$$
$$J_{frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}sin(x)$$
I'm not quite sure I know what you meant by $|x|$ in your original problem statement, but if you just meant the magnitude of $x$, then the specific transform you wanted to compute looks like
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
For $n=1$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pisqrt{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}cos(2pi qr)space sqrt{r} space dr\
\
&= 2 int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} cos(2pi qr)space dr \
\
&=int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} left(e^{i2pi qr} + e^{-i2pi qr}right)space dr \
\
&= left[dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1-iq)} + dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{-i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1+iq)}right]Biggr|_0^infty\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi}left[dfrac{1}{1-iq}+dfrac{1}{1+iq}right]\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{2}{1+q^2}
end{align*}$$
which is exactly what one would expect for the 1 dimensional Fourier Transform.
For $n=2$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pi int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{0}(2pi qr)space r space dr\
\
&mbox{(Hankel Transform table lookup)}\
\
&= dfrac{2pi (2pi)}{left[(2pi q)^2 + (2pi)^2right]^{frac{3}{2}}}\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{1}{left(1+q^2right)^{frac{3}{2}}}
end{align*}$$
For $n =3$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= dfrac{2pi}{sqrt{q}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}sin(2pi qr)space r^{frac{3}{2}} space dr \
\
&= dfrac{2}{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sin(2pi qr)space r space dr \
\
&mbox{(Wolfram Alpha invocation in lieu of integration by parts)}
\
&= dfrac{1}{(2pi)^2}dfrac{4}{(1+q^2)^2}\
end{align*}$$
And I suppose I'll let you keep on going until you see a pattern in terms of $n$ emerge.
From Bracewell, the n-dimensional Fourier Transform
$$F(s_1, dots, s_n) = int_{-infty}^{infty} dots int_{-infty}^{infty} f(x_1,dots, x_n) e^{-2pi i (x_1 s_1 + dots + x_n s_n)} space dx_1 dots dx_n $$
when there is n-dimensional symmetry, can be manipulated into
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} f(r) J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
Where $r$ and $q$ are the radii from the origin in the original domain and transform domain respectively.
So that the cases of $n=1$ and $n=3$ don't seem so foreign, it is probably worth noting that
$$J_{-frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}cos(x)$$
$$J_{frac{1}{2}}(x) = sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi x}}sin(x)$$
I'm not quite sure I know what you meant by $|x|$ in your original problem statement, but if you just meant the magnitude of $x$, then the specific transform you wanted to compute looks like
$$F(q) = dfrac{2pi}{q^{frac{1}{2}n-1}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{frac{1}{2}n-1}(2pi qr)space r^{frac{1}{2}n} space dr$$
For $n=1$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pisqrt{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}cos(2pi qr)space sqrt{r} space dr\
\
&= 2 int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} cos(2pi qr)space dr \
\
&=int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} left(e^{i2pi qr} + e^{-i2pi qr}right)space dr \
\
&= left[dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1-iq)} + dfrac{e^{-2pi r}e^{-i2pi qr}}{-2pi (1+iq)}right]Biggr|_0^infty\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi}left[dfrac{1}{1-iq}+dfrac{1}{1+iq}right]\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{2}{1+q^2}
end{align*}$$
which is exactly what one would expect for the 1 dimensional Fourier Transform.
For $n=2$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= 2pi int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} J_{0}(2pi qr)space r space dr\
\
&mbox{(Hankel Transform table lookup)}\
\
&= dfrac{2pi (2pi)}{left[(2pi q)^2 + (2pi)^2right]^{frac{3}{2}}}\
\
&= dfrac{1}{2pi} dfrac{1}{left(1+q^2right)^{frac{3}{2}}}
end{align*}$$
For $n =3$
$$begin{align*}F(q) &= dfrac{2pi}{sqrt{q}} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sqrt{dfrac{2}{pi(2pi qr)}}sin(2pi qr)space r^{frac{3}{2}} space dr \
\
&= dfrac{2}{q} int_{0}^{infty} e^{-2pi r} sin(2pi qr)space r space dr \
\
&mbox{(Wolfram Alpha invocation in lieu of integration by parts)}
\
&= dfrac{1}{(2pi)^2}dfrac{4}{(1+q^2)^2}\
end{align*}$$
And I suppose I'll let you keep on going until you see a pattern in terms of $n$ emerge.
answered yesterday
Andy Walls
1,314126
1,314126
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005633%2fhow-to-compute-the-fourier-transform-of-e-2-pi-mid-x-mid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Use polar coordinates.
– uniquesolution
2 days ago
It is general n-dimensional. I cannot see how to use the polar coordinates.
– Keith
2 days ago
You can try writing $x=rphi$ with $rinmathbb R_+$ and $phiin S^{n-1}$.
– Federico
2 days ago
Look up the Hankel Transform and its relation to the Fourier Transform for cases of circular and spherical symmetry.
– Andy Walls
2 days ago
I just had a quick glance at the excellent lecture notes {see.stanford.edu/materials/lsoftaee261/chap8.pdf} but I didn't find an answer to your question.
– Jean Marie
2 days ago