Is it possible to start with a partially colored graph for a graph $G$ and complete it into a coloring with...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I was trying this problem: A question about graph coloring and partition of graph



and had an idea which is:



We know that $chi(G[X])le k$ and $chi(G[Y])le k$.
and $E(X,Y)le k-1$. Color $X$ in $G[X]$ using k colors, say${1,2,...,k}$. Then connect the two partion with the $k-1$ edges between them. Because a vertex in $Y$ has at most $k-1$ neighbours in $|X|$, It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ different colored vertices. So pick a vertex $v_1$ in $Y$ whose number of neighbors in $X$ is the maximum among all vertices in $Y$. It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ colored vertices so we can color it using the one of ${1,2...,k}$. Now pick another vertex $v_2$ in $Y$ with neighbour in $|X|$ maximum among all vertices in $X-{v_1}$, It is adjacent to at most $k-2$ edges in $X$(because $v_1$ is adjacent to at least one in $X$). It could also be adjacent to $v_1$, but in any case, it has at most $k-1$ colored neighbors, so then you can color it using one of ${1,2,...,k}$. Keep this coloring process going until you colored all vertices in $Y$ with neighbours in $X$. Now it would be nice if we can complete this partial coloring into a coloring using $chi(G[Y])$ colors. Because then that solves the problem.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I was trying this problem: A question about graph coloring and partition of graph



and had an idea which is:



We know that $chi(G[X])le k$ and $chi(G[Y])le k$.
and $E(X,Y)le k-1$. Color $X$ in $G[X]$ using k colors, say${1,2,...,k}$. Then connect the two partion with the $k-1$ edges between them. Because a vertex in $Y$ has at most $k-1$ neighbours in $|X|$, It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ different colored vertices. So pick a vertex $v_1$ in $Y$ whose number of neighbors in $X$ is the maximum among all vertices in $Y$. It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ colored vertices so we can color it using the one of ${1,2...,k}$. Now pick another vertex $v_2$ in $Y$ with neighbour in $|X|$ maximum among all vertices in $X-{v_1}$, It is adjacent to at most $k-2$ edges in $X$(because $v_1$ is adjacent to at least one in $X$). It could also be adjacent to $v_1$, but in any case, it has at most $k-1$ colored neighbors, so then you can color it using one of ${1,2,...,k}$. Keep this coloring process going until you colored all vertices in $Y$ with neighbours in $X$. Now it would be nice if we can complete this partial coloring into a coloring using $chi(G[Y])$ colors. Because then that solves the problem.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I was trying this problem: A question about graph coloring and partition of graph



and had an idea which is:



We know that $chi(G[X])le k$ and $chi(G[Y])le k$.
and $E(X,Y)le k-1$. Color $X$ in $G[X]$ using k colors, say${1,2,...,k}$. Then connect the two partion with the $k-1$ edges between them. Because a vertex in $Y$ has at most $k-1$ neighbours in $|X|$, It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ different colored vertices. So pick a vertex $v_1$ in $Y$ whose number of neighbors in $X$ is the maximum among all vertices in $Y$. It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ colored vertices so we can color it using the one of ${1,2...,k}$. Now pick another vertex $v_2$ in $Y$ with neighbour in $|X|$ maximum among all vertices in $X-{v_1}$, It is adjacent to at most $k-2$ edges in $X$(because $v_1$ is adjacent to at least one in $X$). It could also be adjacent to $v_1$, but in any case, it has at most $k-1$ colored neighbors, so then you can color it using one of ${1,2,...,k}$. Keep this coloring process going until you colored all vertices in $Y$ with neighbours in $X$. Now it would be nice if we can complete this partial coloring into a coloring using $chi(G[Y])$ colors. Because then that solves the problem.










share|cite|improve this question













I was trying this problem: A question about graph coloring and partition of graph



and had an idea which is:



We know that $chi(G[X])le k$ and $chi(G[Y])le k$.
and $E(X,Y)le k-1$. Color $X$ in $G[X]$ using k colors, say${1,2,...,k}$. Then connect the two partion with the $k-1$ edges between them. Because a vertex in $Y$ has at most $k-1$ neighbours in $|X|$, It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ different colored vertices. So pick a vertex $v_1$ in $Y$ whose number of neighbors in $X$ is the maximum among all vertices in $Y$. It is adjacent to at most $k-1$ colored vertices so we can color it using the one of ${1,2...,k}$. Now pick another vertex $v_2$ in $Y$ with neighbour in $|X|$ maximum among all vertices in $X-{v_1}$, It is adjacent to at most $k-2$ edges in $X$(because $v_1$ is adjacent to at least one in $X$). It could also be adjacent to $v_1$, but in any case, it has at most $k-1$ colored neighbors, so then you can color it using one of ${1,2,...,k}$. Keep this coloring process going until you colored all vertices in $Y$ with neighbours in $X$. Now it would be nice if we can complete this partial coloring into a coloring using $chi(G[Y])$ colors. Because then that solves the problem.







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









mathnoob

65411




65411








  • 1




    If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago














  • 1




    If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago








1




1




If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
– Matt Samuel
2 days ago




If you look at the graph in the shape $N$, this is bipartite and hence $2$-colorable, but if you color the upper right corner and the lower left corner with the same color, you can't extend this to a $2$-coloring.
– Matt Samuel
2 days ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005657%2fis-it-possible-to-start-with-a-partially-colored-graph-for-a-graph-g-and-compl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005657%2fis-it-possible-to-start-with-a-partially-colored-graph-for-a-graph-g-and-compl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$