On the closure of the convex hull of a sequence in normed spaces











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $E$ be a infinite dimensional normed spaces and $(x_n)_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence in $E$ converging to zero. Is it true that the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0}$ in $E$ is equal to the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}$ in $E$, that is, is it true that $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}=overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$ ? (Here we assume that for all $nin mathbb{N}$, $x_nneq 0$.)



However, in may books, instead of writing $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$, I see that it is written $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}$. But, I think that this equality should be true, I mean, these two closures should be the same, which can be seen when we consider the well-known description of the convex hull of a subset $Asubset E$, namely, $co(A)={sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_nx_n: x_nin A, lambda_ngeq0, sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_n=1, Ninmathbb{N}}$.



Am I right?



Thanks for any comment/answer.






functional-analysis normed-spaces







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $E$ be a infinite dimensional normed spaces and $(x_n)_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence in $E$ converging to zero. Is it true that the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0}$ in $E$ is equal to the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}$ in $E$, that is, is it true that $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}=overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$ ? (Here we assume that for all $nin mathbb{N}$, $x_nneq 0$.)



    However, in may books, instead of writing $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$, I see that it is written $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}$. But, I think that this equality should be true, I mean, these two closures should be the same, which can be seen when we consider the well-known description of the convex hull of a subset $Asubset E$, namely, $co(A)={sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_nx_n: x_nin A, lambda_ngeq0, sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_n=1, Ninmathbb{N}}$.



    Am I right?



    Thanks for any comment/answer.






    functional-analysis normed-spaces







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $E$ be a infinite dimensional normed spaces and $(x_n)_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence in $E$ converging to zero. Is it true that the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0}$ in $E$ is equal to the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}$ in $E$, that is, is it true that $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}=overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$ ? (Here we assume that for all $nin mathbb{N}$, $x_nneq 0$.)



      However, in may books, instead of writing $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$, I see that it is written $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}$. But, I think that this equality should be true, I mean, these two closures should be the same, which can be seen when we consider the well-known description of the convex hull of a subset $Asubset E$, namely, $co(A)={sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_nx_n: x_nin A, lambda_ngeq0, sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_n=1, Ninmathbb{N}}$.



      Am I right?



      Thanks for any comment/answer.






      functional-analysis normed-spaces







      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $E$ be a infinite dimensional normed spaces and $(x_n)_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence in $E$ converging to zero. Is it true that the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0}$ in $E$ is equal to the closure of the convex hull of the set ${x_n: nin mathbb{N}}$ in $E$, that is, is it true that $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}=overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$ ? (Here we assume that for all $nin mathbb{N}$, $x_nneq 0$.)



      However, in may books, instead of writing $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}})}$, I see that it is written $overline{co({x_n: nin mathbb{N}}cup{0})}$. But, I think that this equality should be true, I mean, these two closures should be the same, which can be seen when we consider the well-known description of the convex hull of a subset $Asubset E$, namely, $co(A)={sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_nx_n: x_nin A, lambda_ngeq0, sum_{n=1}^Nlambda_n=1, Ninmathbb{N}}$.



      Am I right?



      Thanks for any comment/answer.






      functional-analysis normed-spaces




      functional-analysis normed-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      serenus

      1786




      1786






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Just verify that each side is contained in the other. Obviously, RHS is contained in LHS. For the other way it is enough to show that ${x_n:n in mathbb N} cup {0} $ is contained in RHS (because RHS is closed and convex). This is true because RHS contains the closure of ${x_n:n in mathbb N}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
            – serenus
            5 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004625%2fon-the-closure-of-the-convex-hull-of-a-sequence-in-normed-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Just verify that each side is contained in the other. Obviously, RHS is contained in LHS. For the other way it is enough to show that ${x_n:n in mathbb N} cup {0} $ is contained in RHS (because RHS is closed and convex). This is true because RHS contains the closure of ${x_n:n in mathbb N}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
            – serenus
            5 hours ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Just verify that each side is contained in the other. Obviously, RHS is contained in LHS. For the other way it is enough to show that ${x_n:n in mathbb N} cup {0} $ is contained in RHS (because RHS is closed and convex). This is true because RHS contains the closure of ${x_n:n in mathbb N}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
            – serenus
            5 hours ago















          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Just verify that each side is contained in the other. Obviously, RHS is contained in LHS. For the other way it is enough to show that ${x_n:n in mathbb N} cup {0} $ is contained in RHS (because RHS is closed and convex). This is true because RHS contains the closure of ${x_n:n in mathbb N}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Just verify that each side is contained in the other. Obviously, RHS is contained in LHS. For the other way it is enough to show that ${x_n:n in mathbb N} cup {0} $ is contained in RHS (because RHS is closed and convex). This is true because RHS contains the closure of ${x_n:n in mathbb N}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Kavi Rama Murthy

          39.9k31750




          39.9k31750












          • Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
            – serenus
            5 hours ago




















          • Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
            – serenus
            5 hours ago


















          Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
          – serenus
          5 hours ago






          Kavi Rama Murthy: I agree with you. But, since I saw the LHS in many books, I thought that "Am I missing something ?". So, the equality is indeed the case. Thanks for the explanation.
          – serenus
          5 hours ago




















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004625%2fon-the-closure-of-the-convex-hull-of-a-sequence-in-normed-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          Image
          0 My application was working fine until I decided to go with lazy loading: So, my shared component looks like this: import { Component, Renderer2 } from '@angular/core'; export interface FormModel { captcha?: string; } @Component({ selector: 'app-layout', templateUrl: './app-layout.component.html', styleUrls: ['./app-layout.css'] }) export class FullLayoutComponent { } app-layout.component.ts I am using this component in my Another component say school-home.component.html like this: <app-layout> </app-layout> and it was working fine until I created a Module school-home.module.ts like this: import { NgModule } from '@angular/core'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; import { SchoolhomeRoutingModule ...
          Read more

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 0 This is a simple project showing cubes on Unity, exported to android project and imported on Android studio. On maifest file it showed following warning: Expecting <uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="false" /> tag I have no information about it. And also on default emptyview android project does not use/mention this feature. I know it is required by TV's and such but why its not added by default? Why is this? And Should I concern about it? android unity3d ...
          Read more

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]

          Image
          up vote 0 down vote favorite This question already has an answer here: Image source URI requiring authorization 3 answers Add header to all* HTTP requests on a machine 1 answer first of all sorry for my english. Recently I added some security in the backend of my project, and now I need to send a validation code(apiKey) inside the headers to retrieve the images. I have a problem with ALL images in my project that I had attached in my UI. For example, before I had: <Image Height="90" Source="{Binding Video.Thumbnail}"/> Now I need to change my code to create a CUSTOM petition add the apiKey in the header:...
          Read more