Prove that if $E subset mathbb{R}^n $ has finite perimeter, then almost every vertical slice has finite...











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
end{equation*}

Moreover, if $$
supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
$$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
$$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
$$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
$$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



Any help would be really appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



    Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
    begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
    M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
    end{equation*}

    Moreover, if $$
    supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

    then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



    Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



    I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



    Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
    $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
    for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
    $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
    Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
    $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
    If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
    $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
    This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



    Any help would be really appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



      Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
      begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
      M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
      end{equation*}

      Moreover, if $$
      supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

      then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



      Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



      I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



      Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
      $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
      for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
      $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
      Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
      $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
      If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
      $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
      This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



      Any help would be really appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Before explaining my problem, I recall the definitions:



      Let $E subset mathbb{R}^n$ be a Lebesgue measurable set. We say that $E$ is a set of locally finite perimeter if for every compact set $K subset mathbb{R}^n$ it holds that
      begin{equation*} label{eq:deflocfiniteperimeter}
      M_K := sup left{ int_{E} div, T(x) ,dx : T in C^1_c( mathbb{R}^n; mathbb{R}^n), spt ,T subset K, | T | leq 1 right} < infty.
      end{equation*}

      Moreover, if $$
      supleft{M_K:K subset mathbb{R}^n, Ktext{compact}right}< infty,$$

      then we say that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter.



      Now suppose that $E$ is a set of finite perimeter. I have to prove that for $mathcal{L}^{n-1}$-a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice $E_z subset mathbb{R}$ is a set of finite perimeter; where, by definition, $E_z := { t in mathbb{R} : (z,t ) in E}$.



      I can only prove that for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ the vertical slice is a set of LOCALLY finite perimeter. Here I descrive my attempt:



      Let $rho$ is a regulatizing kernel and consider the sequence $ u_{h} : = chi_E * rho_{1/h}$: I already know (from a previous result) that
      $$ limsup_{h to infty} int_K |nabla u_h(x)| dx leq P(E;K)$$
      for all compact sets $K subset mathbb{R}^{n}$. Now fix a compact $J subset mathbb{R}$. I have proved that if $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ satisfies $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$, then for a.e. $z in mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ it holds
      $$ left| int_{E_z} T'(t) , dt right| leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{J} |nabla u_h (z,t)| , dt .$$
      Taking the sup among the functions $T in C^1_c(mathbb{R})$ with $|T| leq 1$ and $J supset spt T$ and integrating on a compact set $H subset mathbb{R}^{n-1}$, we get
      $$ int_H sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} leq liminf_{h to infty} int_{H times J} |nabla u_h| leq P(E; H times J ) leq P(E) < infty. $$
      If the integral of a function is finite then the function is a.e. finite. Hence for a.e. $z$ we have
      $$ M_{J} := sup left{ left| int_{E_z} T' right| : T in C^1_c(mathbb{R}), , |T| leq 1 , , J supset spt T right} < infty.$$
      This proves that the set has locally finite perimeter but I can't find a uniform bound for $M_{J}$.



      Any help would be really appreciated!







      real-analysis integration measure-theory geometric-measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago

























      asked 2 days ago









      Hermione

      235




      235



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005615%2fprove-that-if-e-subset-mathbbrn-has-finite-perimeter-then-almost-every%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          SQL update select statement

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules