How to solve these simultaneous differential equations











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



Here is my try using Laplace transform:



I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



    $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



    $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



    $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



    Here is my try using Laplace transform:



    I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



    $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



    $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
    Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



    Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



    Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



    $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
    frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



    Now, my question is:
    How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



      $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



      $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



      $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



      Here is my try using Laplace transform:



      I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



      $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



      $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
      Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



      Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



      Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



      $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
      frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



      Now, my question is:
      How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$



      $$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$



      $$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$



      $$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$



      Here is my try using Laplace transform:



      I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$



      $$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$



      $$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
      Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)



      Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)



      Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to



      $$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
      frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$



      Now, my question is:
      How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday





















      New contributor




      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      Pojj

      33




      33




      New contributor




      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            yesterday












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            yesterday










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            16 hours ago










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            9 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            yesterday












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            yesterday










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            16 hours ago










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            9 hours ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            yesterday












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            yesterday










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            16 hours ago










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            9 hours ago















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Hint.



          $$
          mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
          $$



          and



          $$
          int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
          $$



          so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered 2 days ago









          Cesareo

          7,2523416




          7,2523416












          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            yesterday












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            yesterday










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            16 hours ago










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            9 hours ago




















          • Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
            – Pojj
            yesterday












          • @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
            – Cesareo
            yesterday










          • any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
            – Pojj
            16 hours ago










          • @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
            – Cesareo
            9 hours ago


















          Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
          – Pojj
          yesterday






          Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
          – Pojj
          yesterday














          @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
          – Cesareo
          yesterday




          @Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
          – Cesareo
          yesterday












          any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
          – Pojj
          16 hours ago




          any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
          – Pojj
          16 hours ago












          @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
          – Cesareo
          9 hours ago






          @Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
          – Cesareo
          9 hours ago












          Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith