How to solve these simultaneous differential equations
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I want to solve the following equations for $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$
$$ K_0, x_1(t) + K_1, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + M_0, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt} + x_3(t) =A_0,sin (alpha_0 t) tag{1} $$
$$ M_0, frac{dx_1(t)}{dt} + L_0,x_2(t) + K_1, frac{dx_2(t)}{dt}+L_1,int x_2(t), dt =0 tag{2} $$
$$ x_1(t) -alpha_1,B_1,cos(alpha_1,t + phi) , x_3(t)- big[B_0+B_1,sin(alpha_1,t + phi) big] frac{dx_3(t)}{dt} =0 tag{3} $$
Here is my try using Laplace transform:
I can assume $x_1(0)=0$, and define $x_2(0)=x_{20}$, and $x_3(0)=x_{30}$
$$(1) Rightarrow K_0, X_1(s) + K_1, sX_1(s)+ M_0, sX_2(s)+ X_3(s) + M_0, x_{20} = frac{A_0alpha_0}{s^2+alpha_0^2} tag{4} $$
$$(2) Rightarrow M_0, X_1(s) + L_0, X_2(s) +K_1, sX_2(s)+ L_1, frac{X_2(s)}{s}+ X_3(s)+ K_1, x_{20} =0 tag{5} $$
Next step brings me the trouble. I cannot simply take the Laplace transform of (3)
Update 1 (as suggested by @Cesareo)
Using the Euler's expansion of sine and cosine (3) can be transformed to
$$ X_1(s) - B_0 s X_3(s) -\
frac{B_1 (alpha_1 +1) s}{2} big(e^{i phi} X_3(s-i alpha_1) + e^{-i phi} X_3(s+i alpha_1)big)+x_{30} (B_0 - B_1 sin phi)=0 tag{6}$$
Now, my question is:
How can I move forward from here? How can I handle $X_3(s pm i alpha_1)$ ifI want to solve for $X_3(s)$?
differential-equations
differential-equations
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Pojj
33
33
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Pojj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
Hint.
$$
mathcal{L}(cos(alpha t)x(t)) = mathcal{L}(frac 12(e^{ialpha t}+e^{-ialpha t})x(t))
$$
and
$$
int_0^{infty}e^{ialpha t}x(t)e^{-s}dt = int_0^{infty}e^{-(s-ialpha)t}x(t) dt = X(s-ialpha)
$$
so after the Laplace transformation you should handle a system of difference equations ...
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Cesareo
7,2523416
7,2523416
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
Thanks for the tip. I will try it and update here. isn't $mathcal{L} big(e^{i alpha t} x(t) big) = X(s-i alpha) $?
– Pojj
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
@Pojj You are right. I had a little imagination left.
– Cesareo
yesterday
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
any suggestion how I can move forward from here? (Edited the question)
– Pojj
16 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
@Pojj In the same line, eliminating $X_1(s), X_2(s)$ we arrive to a quasi polynomial equation for $X_3(s)$ with the structure $$ f_1(s)X_3(s)+f_2(s)left(e^{iphi}X_3(s-ialpha_1)+e^{-iphi}X_3(s+ialpha_1)right)= C_0 $$ with $f_1(s),f_2(s)$ polynomial fractions ...
– Cesareo
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pojj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005508%2fhow-to-solve-these-simultaneous-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown