I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.



If S subspace of X, I have the following result:



S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$



Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.



Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?



Is there something that I am missing?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.



    If S subspace of X, I have the following result:



    S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$



    Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.



    Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?



    Is there something that I am missing?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.



      If S subspace of X, I have the following result:



      S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$



      Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.



      Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?



      Is there something that I am missing?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.



      If S subspace of X, I have the following result:



      S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$



      Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.



      Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?



      Is there something that I am missing?







      vector-spaces lp-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      qcc101

      468111




      468111






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005576%2fi-want-to-show-explicitly-that-l20-1-subspace-of-l10-1-has-no-internal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote



              accepted










              No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote



                accepted










                No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  uniquesolution

                  8,631823




                  8,631823






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          Kavi Rama Murthy

                          40.8k31751




                          40.8k31751






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005576%2fi-want-to-show-explicitly-that-l20-1-subspace-of-l10-1-has-no-internal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                              How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                              in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith