I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.
If S subspace of X, I have the following result:
S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$
Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.
Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?
Is there something that I am missing?
vector-spaces lp-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.
If S subspace of X, I have the following result:
S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$
Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.
Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?
Is there something that I am missing?
vector-spaces lp-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.
If S subspace of X, I have the following result:
S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$
Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.
Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?
Is there something that I am missing?
vector-spaces lp-spaces
I want to show explicitly that $L^2[0,1]$ subspace of $L^1[0,1]$ has no internal points.
If S subspace of X, I have the following result:
S = X if and only if the interior of S $neq emptyset$
Then to prove that the interior is empty, I just need to prove S is different from X.
Can I just pick $f(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ and say that it belongs to $L^1$ but not to $L^2$ and be done?
Is there something that I am missing?
vector-spaces lp-spaces
vector-spaces lp-spaces
asked 2 days ago
qcc101
468111
468111
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.
No, you are not missing anything. If $X,Y$ are normed spaces, and $X$ is a proper subspace of $Y$, then $X$ has empty interior relative to $Y$. So if you show that $L^2[0,1]$ is a proper subspace of $L^1[0,1]$, you are done. The function $f(x)=frac{1}{sqrt{x}}$ is indeed an element of $L^1[0,1]$ that does not belong to $L^2[0,1]$.
answered 2 days ago
uniquesolution
8,631823
8,631823
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.
I think 'explicitly' here means you have to show that if $f in L^{2}$ then $B(f,epsilon)$ is not contained in $L^{1}$ for any $epsilon >0$. General theory is not supposed to be used here. For this just consider $f+frac 1 {nsqrt x}$ and show that this function lies in the ball $B(f,epsilon)$ for $n$ sufficiently large but it does not belong to $L^{2}$ for any $n$.
answered 2 days ago


Kavi Rama Murthy
40.8k31751
40.8k31751
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005576%2fi-want-to-show-explicitly-that-l20-1-subspace-of-l10-1-has-no-internal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown